Insurance system different, but effective
There's been a lot of talk lately about
Instead, lawmakers opted to set up the
The rate bureau's filings are then subject to the commissioner's review.
Some have advocated for change in the rate bureau system, suggesting that making such a change could result in lower insurance premiums for North Carolinians. For example, a majority of states permit homeowners and automobile insurers to file new rates with the insurance regulators - and then begin charging those new rates immediately, without the regulators' prior approval.
I'm always looking for ways to make things better, to help
I just want to make sure any modi-fications to the way insurance rates are set accomplishes at least these two things: n Provides a fair premium for
I believe that our current ratebureau system achieves these goals and provides better protection for consumers than those states where insurers can simply file and use their new rates without prior approval. As set out in our state law, once the department of insurance receives the filing from the rate bureau, the process of reviewing the request and making an eventual decision on the filing begins.
The department sends out a news release statewide announcing the rate bureau's filing and informing residents of how they can comment on the proposal. This allows consumers to email comments or send them through the postal service.
In the case of homeowners' rate requests, there is also an in-person public hearing which - in recent years - has included a Webex option for consumers to participate virtually.
Within 50 days of the filing, the commissioner must decide to either allow rate bureau's proposed increases to take effect, or to reject them and set a hearing date on proposed rates. Thus far, I have rejected the rate bureau's homeowners' insurance rate increase filing every time. In the meantime, my team of actuaries, lawyers, accountants and other insurance experts pore over thousands of pages of data provided by the rate bureau to see what increases may be justified and what increases are not justified.
Once we get a clear understanding of the data, we can then enter negotiations with the rate bureau and work to settle on a rate that is significantly lower than the proposed increase. However, if no negotiation is possible, I will proceed with the scheduled hearing, where the department's experts and attorneys argue before a hearing officer for rates lower than those the rate bureau has requested.
While I like to avoid protracted legal proceedings if I can, I won't hesitate to hold a hearing if that's necessary to make sure consumers get a fair price.


Legal Notices
Court ruling favors Blue Cross NC, letting fight for state contract continue
Advisor News
- Inflation, competing priorities and uncertainty erode retirement security
- As health premiums rise, 1 in 8 workers cut retirement savings
- CT governor’s candidates claims: What’s true, and what’s misleading
- Retaining clients by giving them a memorable experience
- Addressing the longevity paradox
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- National Life Group expands annuity portfolio
- AM Best to Join Life/Annuity Insurance-Focused Panel Discussion at Capitol Forum Event
- USAA Earns No. 1 Ranking in JD Power Individual Annuity Study for the Third Consecutive Year
- How flexible annuities fit today’s retirement portfolios
- Foresters Financial appoints Tom Ross as chief distribution officer for U.S. annuity sales
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- public notice
- Review '27 Medicare coverage before plans renew
- Univera’s coverage of Roswell Park highlights Medicare Advantage changes this year
- MATSUI INTRODUCES BIPARTISAN LEGISLATION TO PROTECT PATIENT ACCESS TO AFFORDABLE MEDICATIONS
- As feds cut key fee, Indiana Medicaid chief warns changes needed to avoid 'catastrophic situation'
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News