Insurance Department turns a blind eye to cheating
Here is the latest auto insurance scam I encountered.
Traditionally, after a vehicle is damaged in a crash, insurance companies inspect the vehicle at the tow yard or auto body repair shop. If the vehicle is declared a total loss, the insurance company would traditionally make an offer to pay a certain sum in exchange for title and possession of the vehicle.
That is what should happen, and what has traditionally happened. Post-COVID, however, the price of used vehicles has soared, inspiring a more contentious debate between insurers and consumers over what constitutes a fair value on a total loss. Presumably in reaction to this unique climate of increased used car prices, and hence greater payouts on total loss claims, insurers have sought to exact more leverage to underpay claims.
This has inspired a new insurance scam to refuse to make any offer on a total loss claim until after the victim/owner gives over possession of their vehicle. This change in the sequence of the deal makes all the difference.
First, giving the insurance company one's vehicle without a deal in place surrenders nearly all negotiation leverage in favor of the insurance company, which is bent on paying the least possible sum on the claim. Second, some victim/consumers may choose to keep their vehicle to, for example, fix and retitle it. Once they give the insurance company possession, however, they effectively lose that right. Third, forcing victims/owners to give up their vehicle without a deal in place also hands the insurance company, on a silver platter, the ability to delay payment on the claim.
In short: This new process ensures that victims will have to wait longer to get less money. This is wrong, and manifestly illegal.
The state attorney general needs to investigate this practice and sanction those doing it. The state
In response to a complaint, one insurance company argued that it needed to take possession of the vehicle to do a more accurate damage appraisal. Nonsense. Body shops in
When the issue was brought to the state
How long will consumers allow our state
As body shop owners throughout the state will attest, our
I presume the cost-benefit analysis is one premised on giving insurance companies greater regulatory latitude in order to keep insurance jobs here in
Whether it makes sense to let insurers break our laws to hopefully keep more jobs here is a political calculation above my pay grade. But seeing it over and over from this side of the table is certainly frustrating. And not without its costs, including monies cheated from consumers and our citizenry's loss in the faith of an oversight institution that chooses to look away so often.
Researchers Submit Patent Application, “Evidence Oracles”, for Approval (USPTO 20230260047): Patent Application
SCOR launches its new strategic plan: “Forward 2026”
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News