Hundreds of thousands of Illinois residents could lose Medicaid coverage under House Republican proposals
State health care leaders are warning that proposed cuts to federal Medicaid funding could have devastating consequences — potentially resulting in a loss of health care coverage for hundreds of thousands of people in
It’s unclear exactly how much federal money
The bill would reduce federal Medicaid spending by
“We’re going to root out fraud, waste and abuse and that’s where the savings are going to be found,” House Speaker
But health care advocates say the proposed cuts could leave many
“It’s breathtaking the scale of the cut,” said
The bill must still pass the full House, and Johnson has said he’d like to send it to the
Work requirements
One of the biggest current provisions of the bill would impose a requirement that able-bodied adults on Medicaid spend at least 80 hours a month working, in school or engaged in community service.
Trump administration leaders wrote in an opinion essay in The
“For able-bodied adults, welfare should be a short-term hand-up, not a lifetime handout,” they wrote. “But too many able-bodied adults on welfare are not working at all. And too often we don’t even ask them to. For many, welfare is no longer a lifeline to self-sufficiency but a lifelong trap of dependency.”
In
Under the proposed requirement, able-bodied adults who are not working, going to school or engaged in community service could potentially lose their coverage. The requirement, however, may also be problematic for those who are working, Chapman said. It creates more paperwork for Medicaid recipients — and the state — which can lead to people losing coverage even when they qualify.
“The purpose of work requirements is not to have people work, because they already are,” Chapman said. “The point is to create an administrative burden so people lose their eligibility for Medicaid even when they are eligible. It’s just a cynical effort to get people who are eligible off Medicaid.”
If the work requirement goes into effect, anywhere from 270,000 to 500,000 people on Medicaid in
Critics of work requirements point to the experiences of other states that have tried the tactic.
Helping undocumented immigrants
The proposed legislation could also lead to a loss of coverage for more than 770,000
The Affordable Care Act allowed states to expand Medicaid to more adults, namely those earning up to 138% of the federal poverty level. To help states do that, the federal government has been paying 90% of the costs for those adults.
The bill, however, takes aim at states that use their own state funds to pay for health insurance programs for undocumented immigrants — states like
In states that cover health care for undocumented immigrants, the bill would reduce the federal government’s contribution from 90% of the cost to 80% of the cost of coverage for people who gained Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act’s expansion of the program.
In
“The costs for those who remain uninsured would be absorbed by healthcare providers like hospitals who would have to shoulder the costs of uncompensated care,”
Provider taxes
In another move that could mean less Medicaid funding for
States use provider taxes to help raise money for their Medicaid programs. The federal government matches state spending on Medicaid, meaning the revenue from provider taxes also helps increase the federal matching dollars.
Critics of provider taxes have called them a “scam.” They say states essentially tax providers, and then use the federal match to hand that money, plus some, back to the providers, while keeping any extra matching dollars.
“Any future restrictions would significantly limit the state’s ability to provide comprehensive healthcare coverage to
Wilhelmi, with the
“This legislation would severely restrict our ability to use these provider taxes in the future and shrink the resources available to implement the program,” he said. “These proposals will lead to a significant increase in uncompensated care for providers at a time when many hospitals are already facing serious financial pressures.”
In
Medicaid services ‘at risk’
Gov. JB Pritzker has said in recent months that no state in the country, including
“Cuts in federal funding will lead to reduced services and enrollment, as the state will be unable to make up the funding gap,” said Kula. “The full range of Medicaid services will potentially be at risk.”
A significant loss in Medicaid funding could lead to difficult decisions for the state, health care providers and patients.
For some people, a loss of coverage could be life-threatening, health care advocates say.
For example, more than half of
The illness can be managed as long as patients have access to certain medications. But if they lose Medicaid coverage, they may no longer be able to afford those medications, Israel said.
“It’s a domino effect. If folks living with HIV lose their coverage through Medicaid, they lose access to the lifesaving treatment they need,” Israel said. “It will result in new diagnoses, more diagnoses and preventable deaths.”
But the cuts will affect more than just those who are on Medicaid in
If people lose their Medicaid coverage they may see their doctors less and wind up in emergency rooms more often, increasing ER wait times for everyone, she said. If clinics or hospitals have to close because of a loss of Medicaid revenue, that’s one less care option for all patients in a community.
“It doesn’t matter if you have
©2025 Chicago Tribune. Visit chicagotribune.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.


TechMediaBreaks – FingerMotion Inc. (NASDAQ: FNGR) Expands to Indonesia with AI Insurance Platform Through Mach Wireless Deal
Investors send UnitedHealth stock down on report of DOJ criminal investigation into Medicare Advantage
Advisor News
- Estate planning during the great wealth transfer
- Main Street families need trusted financial guidance to navigate the new Trump Accounts
- Are the holidays a good time to have a long-term care conversation?
- Gen X unsure whether they can catch up with retirement saving
- Bill that could expand access to annuities headed to the House
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Insurance Compact warns NAIC some annuity designs ‘quite complicated’
- MONTGOMERY COUNTY MAN SENTENCED TO FEDERAL PRISON FOR DEFRAUDING ELDERLY VICTIMS OF HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS
- New York Life continues to close in on Athene; annuity sales up 50%
- Hildene Capital Management Announces Purchase Agreement to Acquire Annuity Provider SILAC
- Removing barriers to annuity adoption in 2026
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News
- Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company Trademark Application for “RELIANCEMATRIX” Filed: Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
- Jackson Awards $730,000 in Grants to Nonprofits Across Lansing, Nashville and Chicago
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Lonpac Insurance Bhd
- Reinsurance Group of America Names Ryan Krueger Senior Vice President, Investor Relations
- iA Financial Group Partners with Empathy to Deliver Comprehensive Bereavement Support to Canadians
More Life Insurance News