Homeowners hardest hit in latest proposed tax overhaul

Nov. 12--The message sent by Repub­licans in the tax overhaul bill they launched last week is unmistakable and blunt: We think homeowners and buyers have gotten much too sweet a deal from the federal tax code for far too long -- and now we're going to whack them down. No other major sector of the economy gets hit so hard in the proposal in so many places as home ownership.

You've probably heard about the splashiest cut proposed in the bill: a reduction in the maximum deductible mortgage amount from $1 million to $500,000. And you might have figured, "Eh, no big deal, my mortgage is nowhere near that size." But you might have missed some of the other less publicized, but punitive, changes tucked away in the legislative text that just might bite you, now or in the future.

For example, Section 1402 of the proposal would significantly alter the ground rules governing a benefit that millions of homeowners have factored into their financial planning for ­decades. Under current law, you can exclude from taxation the first $250,000 of capital gains on a sale as a single filer ($500,000 filing jointly) provided you have used the house as your principal residence for an aggregate two years out of the five years preceding the sale. Plus you can use the exclusion as frequently as once every two years.

Under the Republican proposal, the two-out-of-five standard would vanish. Instead you'd need to live in and use the property as your main residence for five of the preceding eight years -- a requirement designed to lower the number of people eligible to claim the exclusion. This would inevitably hurt middle-income families and others who were forced to sell their houses because of job transfers or medical reasons, as well as first-time buyers moving up to a new home a few years after purchase as their families expand.

Another noteworthy change that's easy to miss: Section 1302 of the bill, which would slice the mortgage-interest deduction in half, includes a single sentence that could be important to many Americans who own second homes. It says simply that taxpayers can have only one "qualified residence." With that brief redefinition, the bill would eliminate thousands of homeowners' ability to write off mortgage interest on second homes and weekend getaway houses.

Then there's the whole issue of when the housing changes proposed in the bill would take effect. Traditionally, major tax bills contain "transition" periods to give affected taxpayers time to adjust. That could happen with this bill as well, but at the moment, the starting dates included for housing provisions are shocking. Check out these effective dates as they currently stand in the bill:

* The reduction in the mortgage-interest deduction ceiling, plus deductions for second homes, would take effect on loans taken out after Nov. 2. Not only is there no transition time, the changes are essentially retroactive. This could negatively impact home shopping, sales -- and even prices.

* The capital gains exclusion changes would cover home sales after Dec. 31. No grandfathering, no wiggle room.

* The capping of deductions for state and local taxes to $10,000 -- currently there is no limit for taxpayers who itemize -- would start for everybody after Dec. 31. Note that only property taxes could qualify for even this limit -- sales and income taxes would no longer be deductible.

* Expenses related to moving from one home to another no longer would be deductible after Dec. 31.

You might be wondering: Could all this nasty targeting of home ownership actually make it through Congress and get signed into law? Certainly the ­major real estate lobbies -- the National Association of Home Builders and the ­National Association of Real­tors -- plan campaigns to block the housing changes as the bill moves through the House and the Senate unveils its version.

But keep this in mind: Repub­licans are desperate to pass a "tax cut" bill by year's end.

There are plenty of ­obstacles in their way -- even from within their own ranks. But it could happen.

___

(c)2017 the Boston Herald

Visit the Boston Herald at www.bostonherald.com

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.