Health Care Ruling Underscores McSally-GOP Threat to Pre-Existing Condition Coverage Protections
Issuing a decision that starkly underscores
In 2017, McSally voted to provide
Over the past year, McSally has repeatedly refused to stand up for Arizonans' health care access and oppose the lawsuit, instead saying that it's not her "role" to do so. She has a long record of voting to drive up premiums and gut coverage protections -- all to enrich her corporate health insurance industry and big pharma backers.
In October, McSally voted to protect a
"
The lawsuit, which
Eliminates pre-existing condition coverage protections: Insurance companies will again be able to jack up prices on or deny coverage to people with a pre-existing condition -- putting coverage at risk for 2.8 million Arizonans who have a pre-existing condition;
Allows insurance companies charge women more than men: Insurance companies will once again be able to discriminate against women and charge them more than men;
Makes it easier for insurance companies to send families into medical bankruptcy: Insurance companies will again be able to impose annual and lifetime coverage limits -- caps on how much the insurer will cover before individuals are required to pay out-of-pocket -- resulting in dramatically increased out-of-pocket costs for millions of Americans;
Threatens
Ends the provision that lets people under 26 stay on their parents' coverage: Younger Arizonans will have to seek out their own health insurance coverage, no longer able to stay on their parents' health insurance plan until the age of 26; and
Reopens the Medicare "donut hole" and increases costs for seniors: Medicare beneficiaries will "have to pay more for preventive care," while the Medicare Part D coverage gap would be reopened, meaning that seniors will "have to pay more toward their prescription drugs."



Metro Transit union approves new contract after months of negotiation
Democrats Vow To Act On Fires, Floods At LA Debate
Advisor News
- Addressing the ‘menopause tax:’ A guide for advisors with female clients
- Alternative investments in 401(k)s: What advisors must know
- The modern advisor: Merging income, insurance, and investments
- Financial shocks, caregiving gaps and inflation pressures persist
- Americans unprepared for increased longevity
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Globe Life Inc. (NYSE: GL) Making Surprising Moves in Monday Session
- Aspida Life and WealthVest Offer a Powerful New Guaranteed Income Product with the WealthLock® Income Builder
- Lack of digital tools drives wedge between insurers, advisors
- LIMRA: Annuity sales notch 10th consecutive $100B+ quarter
- AIG to sell remaining shares in Corebridge Financial
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Novus Capitalizes on Cannabis Rescheduling, Releases Q1 2026 Growth
- We can't afford to let Democrats lead health care 'reform' | Opinion
- Expanding Medicaid coverage lowered death rates for young adults with kidney failure
- GLP-1s: Rewriting the relationship between pharmacy benefits and stop-loss
- Studies from Denise Wolff et al Have Provided New Data on Atopic Dermatitis (AMCP Market Insights: Beyond skin deep on the role of managed care in moderate to severe atopic dermatitis): Skin Diseases and Conditions – Atopic Dermatitis
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- 3 ways AI can help close the gap for women’s insurance coverage
- Best’s Market Segment Report: AM Best Revises Outlook on Italy’s Life Insurance Segment to Stable From Negative
- Globe Life Inc. (NYSE: GL) Making Surprising Moves in Monday Session
- Dan Scholz to receive NAIFA’s Terry Headley Lifetime Defender Award
- Best’s Special Report: US Property/Casualty and Health Insurers Exceed Cost of Capital; Life Insurers Narrowly Miss
More Life Insurance News