Health Care Ruling Underscores McSally-GOP Threat to Pre-Existing Condition Coverage Protections
Issuing a decision that starkly underscores
In 2017, McSally voted to provide
Over the past year, McSally has repeatedly refused to stand up for Arizonans' health care access and oppose the lawsuit, instead saying that it's not her "role" to do so. She has a long record of voting to drive up premiums and gut coverage protections -- all to enrich her corporate health insurance industry and big pharma backers.
In October, McSally voted to protect a
"
The lawsuit, which
Eliminates pre-existing condition coverage protections: Insurance companies will again be able to jack up prices on or deny coverage to people with a pre-existing condition -- putting coverage at risk for 2.8 million Arizonans who have a pre-existing condition;
Allows insurance companies charge women more than men: Insurance companies will once again be able to discriminate against women and charge them more than men;
Makes it easier for insurance companies to send families into medical bankruptcy: Insurance companies will again be able to impose annual and lifetime coverage limits -- caps on how much the insurer will cover before individuals are required to pay out-of-pocket -- resulting in dramatically increased out-of-pocket costs for millions of Americans;
Threatens
Ends the provision that lets people under 26 stay on their parents' coverage: Younger Arizonans will have to seek out their own health insurance coverage, no longer able to stay on their parents' health insurance plan until the age of 26; and
Reopens the Medicare "donut hole" and increases costs for seniors: Medicare beneficiaries will "have to pay more for preventive care," while the Medicare Part D coverage gap would be reopened, meaning that seniors will "have to pay more toward their prescription drugs."


Metro Transit union approves new contract after months of negotiation
Democrats Vow To Act On Fires, Floods At LA Debate
Advisor News
- CT governor’s candidates claims: What’s true, and what’s misleading
- Retaining clients by giving them a memorable experience
- Addressing the longevity paradox
- Employers shift focus from retirement access to financial outcomes
- Helping widowed clients navigate their new financial reality
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Farm Bureau P&C insurers post first underwriting gain since 2021
- Legacy Marketing, Malibu Life launch two fixed indexed annuities
- Changing client priorities are reshaping annuity conversations
- Solen Software acquires annuity software provider Cooperative Technologies
- MassMutual Expands Lending Options With New Secured Credit Line
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Centene sues feds over low ratings for senior health plans
- Terry Savage: Small business owners, now is the time to offer health insurance coverage
- Aldermen select employee medical insurance broker services provider
- Southwest Bridge Health focusing on insurance coverage gap in Berrien County
- HEALTHCARE SHOULDN'T REQUIRE A MAP
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News