Health Care Ruling Underscores McSally-GOP Threat to Pre-Existing Condition Coverage Protections
Issuing a decision that starkly underscores
In 2017, McSally voted to provide
Over the past year, McSally has repeatedly refused to stand up for Arizonans' health care access and oppose the lawsuit, instead saying that it's not her "role" to do so. She has a long record of voting to drive up premiums and gut coverage protections -- all to enrich her corporate health insurance industry and big pharma backers.
In October, McSally voted to protect a
"
The lawsuit, which
Eliminates pre-existing condition coverage protections: Insurance companies will again be able to jack up prices on or deny coverage to people with a pre-existing condition -- putting coverage at risk for 2.8 million Arizonans who have a pre-existing condition;
Allows insurance companies charge women more than men: Insurance companies will once again be able to discriminate against women and charge them more than men;
Makes it easier for insurance companies to send families into medical bankruptcy: Insurance companies will again be able to impose annual and lifetime coverage limits -- caps on how much the insurer will cover before individuals are required to pay out-of-pocket -- resulting in dramatically increased out-of-pocket costs for millions of Americans;
Threatens
Ends the provision that lets people under 26 stay on their parents' coverage: Younger Arizonans will have to seek out their own health insurance coverage, no longer able to stay on their parents' health insurance plan until the age of 26; and
Reopens the Medicare "donut hole" and increases costs for seniors: Medicare beneficiaries will "have to pay more for preventive care," while the Medicare Part D coverage gap would be reopened, meaning that seniors will "have to pay more toward their prescription drugs."



Metro Transit union approves new contract after months of negotiation
Democrats Vow To Act On Fires, Floods At LA Debate
Advisor News
- Advisors must lead the policy risk conversation
- Gen X more anxious than baby boomers about retirement
- Taxing trend: How the OBBBA is breaking the standard deduction reliance
- Why advisors can’t afford to delay succession planning
- 6 in 10 Americans struggle with financial decisions
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- CT commissioner: 70% of policyholders covered in PHL liquidation plan
- ‘I get confused:’ Regulators ponder increasing illustration complexities
- Three ways the Corebridge/Equitable merger could shake up the annuity market
- Corebridge, Equitable merge to create potential new annuity sales king
- LIMRA: Final retail annuity sales total $464.1 billion in 2025
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Blue Shield says Fresno’s Community Medical Centers turning away patients amid standoff
- El Rio taps experienced leader to oversee transition from North Country HealthCare to Elk Ridge
- Many drop Obamacare and more likely will, SCC hears
- Legislature advances bill limiting copays for Medicaid recipients
- Legislature advances bill limiting copays for Medicaid recipients
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- WHAT THEY ARE SAYING: KATHLEEN COULOMBE JOINS ACU AS CHIEF ADVOCACY OFFICER
- A-CAP Appoints Kirk Cullimore as President of Sentinel Security Life
- Nationwide enters centennial year stronger than ever
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company and Its Subsidiaries
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of CMB Wing Lung Insurance Company Limited
More Life Insurance News