Hazardous Materials: FAST Act Insurance and Liability Study; Request for Comments
SUMMARY: On
Section 7310 of the FAST Act requires the Secretary of Transportation to initiate a study of the levels and structure of insurance for railroad carriers transporting hazardous materials, which must be initiated within four months of the enactment of the FAST Act. Within a year of initiation, the Secretary must submit a report with the results of the study and recommendations for addressing liability issues with rail transportation of hazmat to
DATES: Comments on this notice will be accepted until
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by the docket number (PHMSA-2016-0074) by any of the following methods:
* Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
* Fax: (202) 493-2251.
* Mail: Docket Operations, M-30, Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
* Hand Delivery: To Docket Operations, Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the
Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and docket number for this notice.
* Organization Name,
* Type of Organization (e.g. rail carrier, shipper, insurer, trade organization, government, etc.), and
* An explanation of your interest in this study.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Request for Comments: As part of this study, PHMSA is conducting a review of existing data and literature with regard to current insurance liability levels and structure for rail carriers transporting hazardous materials. This review examines publically available insurance and liability data, including information released by the rail carriers, information released by industry trade associations, data and reports regarding the insurance industry, previous academic, government, or industry studies, and other public sources.
Given the large scope of this study, PHMSA is seeking public comment. Specifically, in an effort to provide an opportunity for stakeholder input on the study and potential sources of data and literature, PHMSA is issuing this notice requesting comment on insurance and liability coverage for rail carriers transporting hazardous materials. PHMSA is requesting input that would inform the study, as well as any available insurance and liability literature and data that may be relevant to this topic.
In addition, PHMSA is seeking input and data related to the following specific questions.
Level and Structure of Insurance and Liability Coverage
1. Please comment on, or provide data relating to, the current level, structure, and type of liability insurance coverage (including self-insurance and retentions) available for hazardous materials transportation by rail. Specifically, please address the following:
* Cost and scope of coverage
* State and Federal Requirements
* Changes in the cost or availability of liability insurance
* Issues unique to your industry, commodity, and/or entity size
2. Are the current levels of liability insurance coverage for hazardous materials transportation by rail appropriate?
* If not, what would be considered an appropriate level?
* Are there policy or market changes that could alter your perspective on what is adequate?
* How do you anticipate this changing in the future?
3. What are the drivers of the current coverage limits for hazardous materials transportation liability insurance?
* Are there policy or market changes that could enable the availability of higher coverage limits?
* How do you anticipate this changing in the future?
4. As hazardous materials transportation by rail is a cross-border enterprise, how, if at all, do foreign requirements related to insurance and liability coverage impact the level, structure and type of insurance and liability coverage held domestically?
Insurance and Liability Alternatives
5. Please comment on, or provide data relating to, any previous or current initiatives for sharing the cost of insurance and/or legal liability for hazardous material by rail incidents between shipper and carrier.
6. Please comment on, or provide data relating to, any other legislative, policy, or voluntary approaches from other industries that may be applicable to liability and insurance related to hazardous materials transportation by rail. To the extent possible, please comment on any potential economic, safety, and environmental considerations related to these alternative approaches.
7. Other industries and foreign governments have implemented programs that impose fees to fund secondary liability coverage and/or create liability caps. Is this a feasible alternative for hazardous materials transportation by rail?
Other Information
8. Please provide any potential studies and data sources that may inform this study.
9. Commenters are invited to address any other considerations related to liability and the rail transport of hazardous materials not addressed above.
Signed in
Acting Associate Administrator for Hazardous Materials Safety,
Notice and request for comments.
Citation: "81 FR 48885"
Document Number: "Docket No. PHMSA-2016-0074 (Notice No. 2016-13)"
Federal Register Page Number: "48885"
"Notices"


Summer Storm Damage? Call Citiwide Adjusters for a High Settlement
Advisor News
- What happens to insurance planning when a client retires early?
- Ask the right questions to turn clients into raving fans
- The first 5 years of your career could determine the next 50
- Your client’s $3 million portfolio doesn’t tell you their insurance needs
- How life insurance can provide liquidity for wealthy families
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- What lower interest rates mean to annuity payouts
- AM Best downgrades A-Cap insurers amid financial and regulatory troubles
- Lawsuit claims Delaware Life hid billions in insurer-linked investments
- AM Best to Deliver Presentation at 2026 ACLI Annual Conference
- Global Atlantic Announces Launch of ForeLifetime Income, a New Fixed Index Annuity
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News