Guest opinion: Actually, we can afford Medicaid expansion
Opponents of Utah’s Proposition 3 to expand Medicaid — which the majority of voters supported — often claim that expanding Medicaid for low-income Utahns will wreck our state budget. They use this claim to justify proposals to impose caps on enrollment, to delay expansion, to impose work requirements or to roll-back expansion completely.
Despite this worn-out “we can’t afford it” claim, we now have the experience from other states’ Medicaid expansions to more accurately predict what will happen in
Here is what the experience from other states tells us, and why our colleagues need to allow Medicaid expansion to proceed.
States that expand Medicaid see broad economic benefits associated with the expansion. Expansion states have experienced economic growth from increased employment and spending in health care and other economic sectors, such as construction and retail services. Since Louisiana’s 2016 expansion, it has seen a
Opponents to Medicaid expansion regularly overstate the negative impact on states’ budgets. In fact, expansion states have been able to reduce spending on mental health and correctional health services and reduce the burden on hospitals for uncompensated care.
Even as the federal share of expansion drops to 90 percent in coming years, some states estimate savings will offset much of their expansion costs, while others expect the expansion will continue producing net budget savings.
Opponents claim that Medicaid expansion will force states to cut funding from other budget priorities like education. But the
Imposing a work requirement for Medicaid, as some propose, sounds like a good idea on the surface. But this actually increases administrative red tape and will cost more than it will ever save. Most importantly, it would further delay implementation because it would require a federal waiver.
Most Medicaid enrollees who can work are already working. Only a small share of people, 6 percent, currently don’t work and would likely meet an exemption because many are full-time caregivers for ill or disabled family members. Multiple studies show that many poor people would lose coverage and would be hurt. Work requirements specifically harm women, children and people with disabilities.
Much of the fear some have about Medicaid expansion is that undeserving people may try to mooch off the system. These fears are unfounded. Nationally, most adults are on Medicaid less than three years. Medicaid is a resource to bridge gaps in coverage, not a lifetime health insurance plan. It functions to get people healthy, so they can work and ultimately secure a job with employer-sponsored health care.
Ultimately, Proposition 3 passed because most Utahns support raising their taxes to give 150,000 low-income Utahns the health care they need. Now with analyses from other expansion states to learn from, the best evidence tells us that Medicaid expansion will greatly improve access and quality to health care, and importantly — that we can afford it. We as legislators should listen to what most Utahns have told us and allow Medicaid expansion to proceed.
CREDIT:



County to Consider Increase to Cybersecurity Insurance
Advisor News
- Why you should discuss insurance with HNW clients
- Trump announces health care plan outline
- House passes bill restricting ESG investments in retirement accounts
- How pre-retirees are approaching AI and tech
- Todd Buchanan named president of AmeriLife Wealth
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company Trademark Application for “EMPOWER READY SELECT” Filed: Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company
- Retirees drive demand for pension-like income amid $4T savings gap
- Reframing lifetime income as an essential part of retirement planning
- Integrity adds further scale with blockbuster acquisition of AIMCOR
- MetLife Declares First Quarter 2026 Common Stock Dividend
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Trump wants Congress to take up health plan
- Iowa House Democrats roll out affordability plan
- Husted took thousands from company that paid Ohio $88 million to settle Medicaid fraud allegations
- ACA subsidy expiration slams Central Pa. with more than 240% premium increases
- Kaiser affiliates will pay $556M to settle a lawsuit alleging Medicare fraudKaiser affiliates will pay $556M to settle a lawsuit alleging Medicare fraudKaiser Permanente affiliates will pay $556 million to settle a lawsuit that alleged the health care giant committed Medicare fraud and pressured doctors to list incorrect diagnoses on medical records to receive higher reimbursements
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News