Governor vetoes bills including one limiting settlement funds
House Bill 4009 would have required the award or recovery of funds or assets as a result of a lawsuit or settlement to be deposited in the
"Although this bill was intended to disallow unfettered use of an officeholder's discretionary settlement funds, its application to the Executive Branch is ill-conceived and does not take into consideration the practical effect on an agency when actual monetary damages are incurred because of a breach of contract," Justice's veto message continued.
Justice used an example of a state agency bringing action against a contractor for damages if a roof being repaired was damaged in the process. In that instance, the agency would hire another contractor to repair the damages and complete the work, causing the agency to incur additional damages.
"The agency would be required to recover by court action, then the damages received for the roof are then deposited to the General Fund," Justice said in the veto message. "Under this bill, only in the event if the Legislature chose to re-appropriate, would the agency recover for its loss."
The governor said the bill did not allow for the return of any administrative costs on behalf of the state agency in a damage award to the state agency involved in the litigation or prosecution of the case. He said the lack of administrative costs contemplated in the bill could discourage state agencies from bringing lawsuits or assisting in the prosecution of cases in the future.
Justice also vetoed Senate Bill 442, which would have established universal forms and deadlines when submitting prior authorization electronically.
Under the bill, the
If the health care practitioner submitted the request for prior authorization electronically, the insurer or plan would respond to that request within 48 hours for urgent care services, or seven days for any prior approval request not for urgent care services. If the information is incomplete, the health care practitioner would have to provide additional information requested within 72 hours from the time the request is received by the practitioner or prior authorization is deemed denied and a new request must be submitted.
"
"Out patients and our practices cannot tolerate the prior authorization regulations as they stand. We worked for improvements, we obtained them, and then all our hard work was discarded."
Email: [email protected]; follow on Twitter @AndreaLannom
___
(c)2018 The Register-Herald (Beckley, W.Va.)
Visit The Register-Herald (Beckley, W.Va.) at www.register-herald.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
UnitedHealthcare Establishes New Endowed Professorship at University of Michigan School of Public Health
Researchers from University of Sydney Report Recent Findings in Health Policy (Do policy-makers find commissioned rapid reviews useful?)
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News