Half the Coverage: What the TLC's Rideshare Insurance Cut Means for Queens Riders
Contributed by
On
For most people hurt in a minor fender-bender, the difference will never show up. For the people hurt worst, the ones with surgeries, long hospital stays and months off work, it can decide how much of the bill they end up paying themselves. This is what changed, who it reaches, and what Queens residents can do about it.
What the
App-based cars that carry passengers in the five boroughs are licensed for-hire vehicles, and their insurance minimums are set by the
The rule requires personal injury protection, the no-fault benefit that pays medical bills and part of lost earnings no matter who caused the crash. For years the
Two things did not change. The liability coverage on a
Who relies on that coverage
More people than the name "passenger coverage" would suggest.
Riders. Under 11 NYCRR 65-3.12(a)(1), part of
People on foot. A pedestrian struck by a car makes the no-fault claim against the insurer of the car that hit them. If the car was a rideshare vehicle, that is the
Cyclists and delivery riders. No-fault treats a person on a bicycle the same way it treats a pedestrian, so a cyclist hit by a for-hire car on
The drivers themselves. A rideshare driver hurt in a crash is an occupant of the vehicle too, so the same
In a borough where tens of thousands of trips a day run on app-dispatched cars, from the airports to the subway stations at the end of the lines, that is a lot of people whose medical safety net shrank in a single rule change.
What
For the large majority of injuries,
The difference appears in the serious cases. Trauma surgery, a stay in intensive care, a spinal fusion or a long stretch of inpatient rehabilitation can each run into six figures on their own. Those are the cases where the old
When the bills run past the limit
Once no-fault is used up, the remaining medical costs do not simply disappear. Insurance Law § 5104(a) bars a lawsuit to recover the basic economic loss that no-fault covers, but it does not bar recovering economic loss above that amount. Bills that go beyond the no-fault coverage become part of the injury claim against the driver who caused the crash.
That sounds like a complete answer, and it is not, because of where that money comes from. If the rideshare driver was at fault, the injury claim runs against the same
Health insurance may also step in once no-fault is exhausted. A health plan that pays those bills can often seek repayment from a later settlement, so it changes who is owed money, not how much is available in total.
An example from
A restaurant worker in
Had the crash happened in
Because it happened in May, the no-fault coverage stops at
Where else might he look? His own household auto policy, if anyone he lives with owns a car and bought supplementary uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage, known as SUM. Any other driver who shared the blame. And the lost wages, which no-fault pays only in part, need careful documentation, because the balance also belongs in the claim.
Which date controls
The amount available depends on the policy that was in force on the car on the day of the crash. A collision in 2025 or the first two months of 2026, on a car that was then carrying the
Where the ride began also matters. The
Where these claims go wrong
Treating no-fault as unlimited
People who are told "no-fault covers your medical bills" reasonably assume it covers all of them. In a serious case it may not. Someone should be tracking the running total of bills against the
Not telling the hospital it was a rideshare car
Emergency room staff often bill the patient's own insurance by default. If the hospital does not know the injured person was in, or struck by, a
Missing the 30-day notice
The no-fault application must reach the
Settling the injury claim before the bills are known
Because excess medical costs now come out of the same liability limit, accepting an early offer before treatment is finished can lock in a number that is too low. The total of the bills is part of what the settlement has to account for.
Assuming the app company will sort it out
A message through the app's help center is not a no-fault claim. The coverage sits with the insurer of the for-hire vehicle, and the claim has to be made there.
Frequently asked questions
Does the change affect yellow taxis too?
This article is about app-based for-hire vehicles under rule 59A-12. Yellow and green cabs operate under their own
I was hit by an Uber while walking. Do I use my own car insurance?
No. A pedestrian's no-fault claim goes to the insurer of the car that struck them, so the claim is against the rideshare car's policy whether or not you own a car.
Can I still sue if no-fault paid my bills?
Yes, for the injury itself, if it meets
My crash was in
It depends on the policy in force on the car that day. If the policy carried the
Is
No. It is the minimum. Some vehicles carry more, and the actual limits on the policy are worth confirming in writing from the insurer.
Where to start
If you or someone in your family was badly hurt in, or by, an Uber or Lyft in
This piece offers a general overview of
Speak to a Queens injury attorney
The Ribowsky Law office sits on
Ribowsky Law Queens Personal Injury & Accident Lawyer
Phone: 718-659-5333{ "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Article", "headline": "Half the Coverage: What the
The post Half the Coverage: What the
Distributed by Newsbank, inc.


3,054 Shares in Cincinnati Financial Corporation $CINF Acquired by Burns Matteson Capital Management LLC
Hawthorne School Budget Faces New Pressure As Health Insurance Costs Jump Nearly 34%
Advisor News
- Navigating client communication in a digital age
- Can your advisory firm survive without you?
- I started using AI, but what now?
- How to support an entrepreneur client with multiple businesses
- Could a narrower focus help grow your practice?
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Solen Software Group Acquires Cooperative Technologies, Provider of 1035 Exchange and Annuity Replacement Software
- MassMutual Expands Lending Options With New Secured Credit Line
- Corebridge Financial Introduces Progressive Trigger, a First-of-Its-Kind Index Annuity Strategy Designed to Turn Missed Years into Future Opportunity
- Insurer proposes $1.1M deal to resolve CA teachers’ annuity fee lawsuit
- IMOs get frustrated with slow carrier adoption of faster technology
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Health plans task force fight Medicaid fraud
- Recent Findings from Brown University Provides New Insights into Managed Care (Use of Brokers In Medicare Advantage and Standalone Part D Plans): Managed Care
- More than 1,700 Pottawattamie County residents face Medicare plan cancellations
- KENTUCKY CAN CUT HEALTH PREMIUMS WITHOUT SPENDING A DIME
- SpecialtyCare sues Anthem over $2.5 million in unpaid awards
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News