“Flooding is the most common and costly natural disaster facing the country,” U.S. Senate panel pushes for major changes to federal flood insurance program
Instead, it has used a series of stopgap bills to extend the life of the program that has issued nearly 5 million policies.
The lackadaisical approach to brokering a five-year reauthorization of the program was one of several topics the
"Flooding is the most common and costly natural disaster facing the country," said Ohio Democratic Sen.
The National Flood Insurance Program, he said, is not only responsible for writing policies for homeowners and businesses but for trying to mitigate the impacts of future flooding.
Scott criticizes outdated maps, lack of data
"The program is financially insolvent with over
The NFIP pays out about 30% of its "resources" to roughly 1% of "properties that consistently and repeatedly are flood victims again and again and again," Scott said.
"That's an opportunity for us to look to the local communities to create strategies to perhaps not rebuild there," Scott said, adding that
Scott also noted that at some point lawmakers need to talk about a "comprehensive" approach to catastrophic events, noting that different regions of the country experience different natural disasters like wildfires, tornadoes and hurricanes.
"If you live in America, the fact is simple — we, the taxpayers, have paid out hundreds of billions of dollars over the last 10 years because of catastrophic occurrences," he said.
Lawmakers need to address how the size and scope of all natural disasters impacting homeowners and the economy, especially when the cost of repairing or rebuilding reaches a level that private insurance companies cannot handle, he said.
"Without that comprehensive approach, we really are missing the target by a mile," Scott said.
"NFIP's new risk assessment policy called Risk Rating 2.0 has made flood insurance simply impossible to afford; in some cases policies rising over 1,000%," he said.
"At this point, we know that we're in an actuarial death spiral, where people will be dropping insurance because they can no longer afford (it); therefore a smaller number of people for whom to put on the risk. Therefore, more expensive premiums and therefore more people drop," Cassidy added.
Hecht told the committee that 50% of
"If our workers cannot live there, this is going to have impacts on our ability to supply America and the world with food," Hecht said.
The
The cap on insurance premium increases should be lowered from 18% to 9%, he said.
"Not only does it protect existing homeowners against their existing risk, it helps protect homeowners in the future and … anyone else who purchases that home in the future against future risks," Kaniewski said. "It also gets at the affordability issue, because if you've reduced your risk, you should also be able to reduce your rates."
Flood insurance out of reach for some families
"In
"It is a challenge to have that added burden, especially those who are living within the floodplains within the city and throughout the county," Patterson added. "It's going to be an exceptional burden on them to echo the already existing cost of living increases that we're all experiencing."
New Jersey Democratic Sen.
"Insurance is about spreading risk, right?" he said. "The wider the pool, the less the costs. The smaller the pool, the higher the cost. And that drives people out at the end of the day."
This story appeared on the website of the Florida Phoenix, a nonprofit news organization dedicated to coverage of state government and politics from
CAP Releases New Reports With Solutions To Lower the Costs of Employer-Sponsored Insurance
Oakbridge Insurance Establishes Presence in Atlanta With New Partner a2|benefits
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News