FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD FINALIZES HYPOTHETICAL SCENARIOS FOR ITS ANNUAL STRESS TEST AND VOTES TO MAINTAIN THE CURRENT STRESS TEST-RELATED CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS UNTIL PUBLIC FEEDBACK CAN BE CONSIDERED
The following information was released by the
The
"Waiting to calculate new stress capital buffer requirements until we receive public feedback will give us the opportunity to correct any deficiencies in our supervisory models based on that feedback," said Vice Chair for Supervision
The Board's annual stress test evaluates the resilience of large banks by estimating losses, net revenue, and capital levels under hypothetical recession scenarios that extend two years into the future. This year, 32 banks will be tested against a severe global recession with heightened stress in both commercial and residential real estate markets, as well as in corporate debt markets. The scenarios are not forecasts and should not be interpreted as predictions of future economic conditions.
In the 2026 stress test scenario, the
Large banks with substantial trading or custodial operations are also required to incorporate a counterparty default scenario component to estimate potential losses from the unexpected default of the firm's largest counterparty amid an acute market shock. In addition, banks with large trading operations will be tested against a global market shock component that primarily stresses their trading and related positions. The final scenarios include two revisions to the global market shock component to improve consistency across shocks applied to similar exposures and enhance plausibility.
The table below shows the components of the annual stress test that apply to each bank, based on data as of the third quarter of 2025. The brief methodology document describes the Board's intention to generally use the same models as the 2025 stress test with limited model adjustments.



Health insurance CEOs say they lose money in Obamacare marketplace despite subsidies
Health care inflation continues to eat away at retirement budgets
Advisor News
- Pay or Die: The scare tactics behind LA County’s Measure ER tax increase
- How to listen to what your client isn’t saying
- Strong underwriting: what it means for insurers and advisors
- Retirement is increasingly defined by a secure income stream
- Addressing the ‘menopause tax:’ A guide for advisors with female clients
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- MassMutual turns 175, Marking Generations of Delivering on its Commitments
- ALIRT Insurance Research: U.S. Life Insurance Industry In Transition
- My Annuity Store Launches a Free AI Annuity Research Assistant Trained on 146 Carrier Brochures and Live Annuity Rates
- Ameritas settles with Navy vet in lawsuit over disputed annuity sale
- NAIC annuity guidance updates divide insurance and advisory groups
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- GLP-1 Drug Costs Cited as Heights Schools Hike Taxes and Cut Staff
- Pay or Die: The scare tactics behind LA County’s Measure ER tax increase
- Column: N.C.’s Medicaid ‘compromise’ comes at a cruel cost
- Idaho farmers can band together to buy cheaper health insurance through Farm Bureau deal
- HHS NOTICE OF BENEFIT AND PAYMENT PARAMETERS FOR 2027 FINAL RULE
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- 2025 Insurance Abstracts
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Berkshire Hathaway Life Insurance Company of Nebraska and First Berkshire Hathaway Life Insurance Company
- Generational expectations: A challenge for the industry
- Greg Lindberg asks NC judge for no jail time in bribery, fraud cases
- National Life Group Names Brenda Betts to Its Board of Directors
More Life Insurance News