EDITORIAL: St. Joseph County health contract a step forward (sort of)
Approved by the county
R&R Benefits was hired by the county in 2013 and worked under a "letter of engagement" up until now. R&R never had a contract outlining its responsibilities and how much it would be paid to carry out those responsibilities.
While the new contract lists the firm's duties, it doesn't say how much it will be paid. "I would have liked to see that clearly articulated," said
It's worth noting that Kostielney voted against the proposal, saying he would have preferred the firm be paid a flat annual fee rather than allowing it to be paid indirectly with health insurance premiums and commissions.
As recently as two years ago Kostielney said he supported R&R and the job it was doing for the county, adding he believed it would be difficult to find a consulting firm that would do a better job than the county's current one. He still believes R&R is doing excellent work.
But some have questioned sticking with the firm, especially when a study ranked three firms higher than R&R, with the potential to save substantial costs when it came to health insurance.
County Auditor
We agree with the auditor. Having a contract that spells out exactly how much the county will pay its health insurance broker and what services will be provided for that cost is better than being paid indirectly with health insurance premiums and commissions, which is the case now.
Still, having a contract is one step that will better serve the county and its employees and retirees who depend on an efficiently run health insurance program. It's just not a large enough step.
___
(c)2018 the South Bend Tribune (South Bend, Ind.)
Visit the South Bend Tribune (South Bend, Ind.) at www.southbendtribune.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Coming back to life
Wife of Malaysia’s ex-leader slams ‘public trial’ of family
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News