Day 19 live updates: Maggie’s calf had tire impression on it, expert tells Murdaugh jury

Alex Murdaugh, a once prominent Hampton-based attorney from a well-known politically connected family, is on trial in the deaths of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul.

Murdaugh has pleaded not guilty. He faces life in prison without parole if found guilty. The trial started Jan. 23 with jury selection, opening arguments and the initial round of witness testimony. For now, the trial is expected to stretch at least through Friday, Feb. 17.

How to watch the Murdaugh double murder trial, who to follow from The State, Island Packet

11:35 a.m. — Maggie’s calf had tire tread impression

An unidentified impression on the back of Maggie Murdaugh’s calf that defense attorneys have raised questions about repeatedly is a tire tread impression, crime scene expert Kenneth Kinsey said.

Kinsey, also the chief deputy of the Orangeburg County Sheriff’s Office, said the impression is most likely from the tire of an ATV found “in close proximity” to Maggie’s body.

Kinsey clarified he saw no evidence Maggie Murdaugh was run over, though.

“At some point in time, Ms. Maggie Murdaugh’s calf made contact with that front driver’s side tire or one like it,” Kinsey said.

11:30 a.m. — Expert: Paul moved toward shooter before fatal shot

Before Paul Murdaugh was shot a second, fatal time, blood spatter expert Kenneth Kinsey said he likely moved toward the shooter.

When Paul was first shot, Kinsey said the shotgun was “somewhere inside the doorway” of the feed room. Paul then moved “real slow” toward the door he was shot from, Kinsey said. Kinsey determined Paul’s path based on blood droplets on the feed room floor. The shooter was somewhere outside the doorway and slightly to the right when they fired the second, immediately fatal blast to Paul’s left shoulder and head, Kinsey said.

10:45 a.m. — State expert breaks down Murdaugh crime scene

Kenneth Kinsey, Orangeburg County Sheriff’s Department chief deputy and a crime scene investigation expert, is testifying on blood patterns found at the kennels on the Murdaugh’s Colleton County estate, known as Moselle.

Lead prosecutor Creighton Waters opened his questioning discussing details of Paul Murdaugh’s death.

Kinsey said Paul was roughly 5 feet from the feed room door when he was first shot, and the shotgun was at “a bare minimum” somewhere inside the doorway, since the shells were ejected inside the room.

Paul was stationary for a time after the first wound to his chest, Kinsey said. Kinsey explained the circular blood drops around the crime scene prove this, since droplets that fall straight down splatter into a circle.

“These 90-degree (blood) drops here tell me that Paul was standing there for a moment. I can’t tell you how long,” Kinsey said.

Other blood droplets show Paul apparently moved toward the door, Kinsey said, though “not very fast.”

10:20 a.m. — State calls crime scene expert

Kenneth Lee Kinsey, chief deputy with the Orangeburg County Sheriff’s Department, has taken the stand.

Kinsey said he specializes in crime scene investigation, particularly violent crime. He’s the “No. 2 man” in his department, he said.

9:55 a.m. — Defense reaffirms objection to Labor Day shooting evidence

Without the jury present, defense attorney Jim Griffin reiterated the defense’s objection to the jury hearing testimony related to Alex Murdaugh’s attempted suicide in September 2021.

Murdaugh was shot on the side of a Hampton County road on Sept. 3, 2021, allegedly by Curtis “Eddie” Smith, Murdaugh’s distant cousin and alleged accomplice who’s been accused of being the shooter Labor Day weekend. Murdaugh was airlifted to the Savannah hospital after the shooting, and was interviewed by SLED agents.

Griffin objected to the state’s introduction of a “panoply” of evidence, including a video of Murdaugh’s hospital interview, he said was irrelevant to the crimes Murdaugh is on trial for, the June 7, 2021, murders of his wife and son. The murders of Paul and Maggie took place months earlier in June 2021, therefore evidence of the September 2021 incident shouldn’t be considered, he said.

Newman originally ruled Wednesday that the roadside shooting evidence was inadmissible, but reversed course at the end of court Wednesday after he said the defense “opened the door” to the evidence.

In cross-examination of lead SLED investigator David Owen, Griffin asked who else was considered a suspect.

He brought special attention to whether Smith was considered a suspect, or if Owen was aware Smith was deeply indebted to a drug gang. Griffin suggested that debt, and Murdaugh spending $50,000 a week on drugs Smith supplied, might have made Murdaugh’s family a target for a retaliatory “drug hit.”

Newman decided Smith’s involvement in the roadside shooting, and the defense choosing to bring Smith into focus, was what paved the way for admitting evidence related to the Labor Day weekend incident.

“The court ruled that (the roadside shooting) was a bridge too far, then the defense decided to build a road over that bridge,” Newman said.

Lead prosecutor Creighton Waters hinted the evidence is primarily intended to show Murdaugh lied to SLED agents about who was involved in the shooting, displaying the ability to lie to law enforcement. Murdaugh didn’t first disclose Smith’s involvement.

Court has entered recess as legal teams decide how much evidence related to the incident should be admitted.

9:30 a.m. — Court resumes as state nears end of case

Court is back in session Thursday after another eyebrow-raising trial day 24 hours before.

Meanwhile, the state’s case, initially expected to wrap up Wednesday, is now expected to be finished by Friday.

Judge Clifton Newman on Wednesday reversed his previous decision to disallow the Labor Day weekend 2021 shooting incident to be introduced to the jury after he said defense attorneys opened the door when attorney Jim Griffin asked a witness about Curtis “Eddie” Smith, a distant cousin of Murdaugh’s and alleged accomplice in drug crimes and the shooting of Murdaugh.

Will Smith take the stand? That’s the question reporters and the public asked Wednesday, or will prosecutors only use testimony from the law enforcement officers who responded to the Labor Day weekend shooting?

Murdaugh was charged with insurance fraud in the shooting, after charges say he intended to leave his surviving son, Buster, a hefty life insurance policy. Smith was used in order to elude the insurance’s suicide exemption, authorities have said.

For most of Wednesday, the jury heard from David Owen, a senior special agent with the S.C. Law Enforcement Division.

Owen, the lead case agent on the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh, explained the third and final interview they gave to Murdaugh, asking him whether he killed his wife and son.

“Did you kill Maggie?” Owen asked Murdaugh directly in a recording played for the jury. “Did you kill Paul, do you know who did?”

At that time, Owen testified, Murdaugh was the “only known suspect” in the murders.

Murdaugh denied both the killings, and asked whether the questions meant he was still considered a suspect.

“I have to look at all of the evidence and the facts presented,” Owen responded in the interview.

In cross-examination, Owen acknowledged it was an opportunity missed to search Murdaugh’s mother’s home. Murdaugh has contended he visited his mother, Libby, the night of the murders before coming back to his home and discovering his wife and son’s bodies.

Even more interesting, Owen, being pushed on the stand by Griffin about testimony he gave to the Colleton County Grand Jury, acknowledged part of his 2021 testimony that led to Murdaugh’s indictment was incorrect.

Days earlier, another SLED agent testified that the white T-shirt agents seized from Murdaugh on June 7, 2021, had no blood on it, though it did have DNA consistent with Maggie and Paul. The shirt had a positive preliminary test result for blood, the agent said, but returned a negative result when SLED used a “confirmatory” test.

Owen said he presented evidence to the grand jury stating an out-of-state expert identified several areas of blood spatter on the white T-shirt. He said he’d never seen SLED’s test results showing no blood until November 2022.

“You didn’t know then, but you know now that what you told the Colleton County Grand Jury was not correct?” Griffin asked.

“In reference to the shirt, yes,” Owen testified.

©2023 The Charlotte Observer. Visit charlotteobserver.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.