Consumer Watchdog Calls on Insurance Commissioner Lara to Reject Mercury's Job-Based Insurance Rate Discrimination
Insurance Commissioner
Under Mercury's proposed overall 6.9% rate increase, over 1.6 million vehicles it insures face an average annual premium increase of
These grocery clerks, hotel workers, janitors, home healthcare aides and other drivers without white-collar jobs will be charged base rates that are more than
A 2019 investigation by the
Consumer Watchdog called on Commissioner Lara to reject Mercury's use of job and education to overcharge working-class Californians in this rate filing, and move a regulation forward to make all insurance companies rate Californians fairly regardless of their job or education level.
Mercury's request comes as soaring gas and food prices have low-wage workers struggling now more than ever to make ends meet. Most policyholders-from waiters to cashiers, construction workers to call center operators-will see their auto insurance rates increase up to about 20% more than drivers with professional occupations and advanced degrees such as engineers with a Bachelor's degree or higher education level. Mercury's request also includes rate hikes on educators, paramedics, firefighters, and police officers.
"The last thing Californians should have to worry about when we're facing sky-high prices at the gas pump and grocery store is whether they're being gouged by their insurance company," said Consumer Watchdog staff attorney
"Commissioner Lara needs to help working families and adopt regulations to stop occupation-based premium surcharges; surcharges that his own 2019 investigation found create 'wide socioeconomic disparities.' Instead of rubber-stamping these discriminatory discounts, the Commissioner should use his voter-enacted authority under Proposition 103 to protect middle- and low-income families from being charged higher prices based on their jobs," said Sternberg.
The Commissioner last approved Mercury's discriminatory occupation-based rating system and a 6.9% overall rate increase for Mercury policyholders in
Occupation has never been approved by regulation as a lawful rating factor under voter-enacted Proposition 103. Mercury's unfairly discriminatory occupation-based rating system means lower income and less-educated drivers continue to pay the highest premiums based solely on their job titles.
Consumer Watchdog's petition also alleges that Mercury overcharged policyholders during the COVID-19 lockdowns when accident claims were down and may owe hundreds of millions in additional refunds.
Read Consumer Watchdog's Petition for Hearing and Petition to Intervene: https://consumerwatchdog.org/sites/default/files/2022-07/2022-07-18%20Mercury%20Auto%202022%20PFH%20w%20Exhs%20A%20and%20B.pdf
Consumer Watchdog and 10 community and civil rights organizations challenged auto insurers' illegal and discriminatory use of job and education to set rates in
Read the community and civil rights groups' petition: https://consumerwatchdog.org/sites/default/files/2019-02/Job%26EducationPetition.pdf
The Department's analysis of industry data shows that drivers in the highest per capita income ZIP codes are more than twice as likely to receive occupational-based discounts than drivers in the lowest per capita income ZIP codes; and only 29% of drivers in predominately minority ZIP codes receive such discounts as compared with 47% of drivers living in ZIP codes with a predominately white population. In addition, 75% of drivers in
Voter-approved Proposition 103 requires auto insurance premiums be based primarily on three mandatory factors - driving safety record, annual mileage, and years driving experience - and prohibits unfairly discriminatory rates. Proposition 103 prohibits this kind of unfair rate discrimination based on income or race.
* * *
Original text here: https://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/consumer-watchdog-calls-insurance-commissioner-lara-reject-mercurys-job-based-insurance



New NSAC Report Projects Billions Saved Via Crop Insurance Subsidy Caps
Cancer Action Network: Survey – More Than 80% of Cancer Patients and Survivors Say Copay Assistance Programs Help Them Afford Their Prescription Drugs
Advisor News
- Pay or Die: The scare tactics behind LA County’s Measure ER tax increase
- How to listen to what your client isn’t saying
- Strong underwriting: what it means for insurers and advisors
- Retirement is increasingly defined by a secure income stream
- Addressing the ‘menopause tax:’ A guide for advisors with female clients
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- MassMutual turns 175, Marking Generations of Delivering on its Commitments
- ALIRT Insurance Research: U.S. Life Insurance Industry In Transition
- My Annuity Store Launches a Free AI Annuity Research Assistant Trained on 146 Carrier Brochures and Live Annuity Rates
- Ameritas settles with Navy vet in lawsuit over disputed annuity sale
- NAIC annuity guidance updates divide insurance and advisory groups
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Pay or Die: The scare tactics behind LA County’s Measure ER tax increase
- Column: N.C.’s Medicaid ‘compromise’ comes at a cruel cost
- Idaho farmers can band together to buy cheaper health insurance through Farm Bureau deal
- HHS NOTICE OF BENEFIT AND PAYMENT PARAMETERS FOR 2027 FINAL RULE
- Reports Outline Clinical Trial Research Study Results from Imperial College London (Multimorbidity, health service use, and health insurance by socioeconomic groups in 31 countries: A multi-cohort study): Clinical Trial Research
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Berkshire Hathaway Life Insurance Company of Nebraska and First Berkshire Hathaway Life Insurance Company
- Generational expectations: A challenge for the industry
- Greg Lindberg asks NC judge for no jail time in bribery, fraud cases
- National Life Group Names Brenda Betts to Its Board of Directors
- Ask Tim a Question? Business, Finances, Money, or Taxes
More Life Insurance News