Commentary: Eliminate tobacco surcharge
The joint commission found one way to reduce the cost of health insurance was to eliminate the tobacco surcharge, which some insurers add to the cost of plans. To discourage people from smoking, insurers often charge tobacco users up to 50% more in premiums than nonsmokers.
Numerous studies have found the tobacco surcharge does not work as intended. Instead, it is a barrier to people purchasing health insurance coverage — especially younger, healthier tobacco users. Many have low incomes, and for them, the surcharge is a significant cost.
Studies show removing the tobacco surcharge would encourage more people to enter the market and lower the price of health insurance. Increasing the number of healthy individuals in the market spreads costs across a larger pool of people, thereby reducing premiums and allowing smokers to take advantage of cessation programs offered by insurers.
The joint commission found eliminating the tobacco surcharge likely would reduce premiums by 3% to 4.5%. The number of people in the individual market could increase by as much as 13,000 and the number of uninsured could be reduced by 14,000.
As a result of this study, the joint commission unanimously voted to recommend legislation that would reduce the costs of health insurance in the individual market. We sponsored the legislation with Senate Bill 422 and House Bill 675, and both chambers passed the bills by wide margins.
A tobacco surcharge is prohibited in six states, and several others restrict the amount of the surcharge. The legislation was supported by a number of organizations, including the
Eliminating the tobacco surcharge would mean having more insured people in the market, which makes monthly health insurance premiums more affordable. This would help many
Localities with some of the highest numbers of uninsured people also have some of the highest totals of tobacco users. Thus, eliminating the surcharge would encourage the uninsured to purchase much-needed health insurance. Also, many young people who do not purchase health insurance would be encouraged to do so if costs were lower.
Unfortunately, Gov.
By eliminating the tobacco surcharge, this legislation would encourage more people to purchase insurance, make it more affordable and enable the costs per person to drop.



Sun Life to host virtual-only format for 2022 Annual Meetings of shareholders and voting policyholders
SE2 Appoints Michele Trogni as CEO
Advisor News
- CONGRESSMAN VALADAO DEMANDS ANSWERS FROM CALIFORNIA OVER HEALTHCARE TAX HIKE
- How executive benefits impact an estate plan
- 73% of US business leaders say economic uncertainty keeps them from focusing on transition
- A new era at the Federal Reserve
- What advisors need to know about the life settlement boom
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- IRI, ACLU express support for CLEAR Forms Act
- A new era at the Federal Reserve
- Globe Life Inc. (NYSE: GL) Making Surprising Moves in Tuesday Session
- Why annuities are gaining traction with younger investors
- Best’s Special Report: U.S. Life/Annuity Industry Sees Bottom-Line Growth Despite 18% Decline in Total Income in First-Quarter 2026
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- CONGRESSMAN VALADAO DEMANDS ANSWERS FROM CALIFORNIA OVER HEALTHCARE TAX HIKE
- How much do state residents need to retire comfortably?
- HAYES INTRODUCES BILL TO LOWER COSTS FOR TELEHEALTH PATIENTS
- NEW URGENCY TO ADDRESS ROOT CAUSES OF AFFORDABILITY CRISIS AS HEALTHCARE SPENDING HITS RECORD $5.7T
- Workplace pilot will support employees with celiac disease
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- How much do state residents need to retire comfortably?
- How executive benefits impact an estate plan
- Connecticut retirees face high savings hurdles
- AI-created images in insurance fraud and the impacts on clients, advisors
- Roberts Disability Law Sues Unum Life Insurance Company of America on Behalf of Disabled Valero Refinery Operator for Allegedly Underpaying Long-Term Disability Benefits
More Life Insurance News