Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: Market Saturation and Utilization Data Tool
Market Saturation and Utilization Data Tool
Market Saturation and Utilization Data Tool was developed to allow the
The tool includes interactive maps and datasets that show national-, state-, county-, and Core-Based Statistical Area (CBSA)-level provider services and utilization data for selected health service areas. Provider services and utilization data by these geographic regions are easily compared using the interactive maps above. The tool is available through the CMS website at: https://data.cms.gov/market-saturation. Future releases may include comparable information on additional health service areas.
Release 9 introduces two additional service areas and contains eleven, twelve-month reference periods and nineteen health service areas:
Release 9 also introduces an additional geographic division of Core-Based Statistical Area (CBSA). CBSAs are geographical delineations that encompass both metropolitan statistical areas and micropolitan statistical areas. A micropolitan statistical area is an urban cluster of at least 10,000 people but less than 50,000 people, while a metropolitan statistical area is an urban cluster of at least 50,000 people. CBSAs are
Methodology
The analysis is based on paid Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) claims data from the CMS Integrated Data Repository (IDR). The IDR contains Medicare FFS claims, beneficiary data, provider data, and plan data. FFS claims data are analyzed for a 12-month reference period, and state- and county-level results are updated quarterly to reflect a more recent 12-month reference period. CBSA data are also analyzed for a 12-month reference period and results will be updated annually to reflect a more recent calendar year.
The Market Saturation and Utilization methodology is different from other public use data with respect to determining the geographic location of a provider. In this analysis, claims are used to define the geographic area(s) served by a provider rather than the provider's practice address. Further, a provider is defined as "serving a county" if, during the 12-month reference period, the provider had paid claims for more than ten beneficiaries located in a county. A provider is defined as "serving a state" if that provider serves any county in the state. Similar to the county-level definition, a provider is defined as "serving a CBSA" if, during the one-year reference period, the provider had paid claims for more than ten beneficiaries located in that CBSA. The CBSA location is an aggregation of county level data.
The Market Saturation and Utilization methodology is also different from other public use data with respect to determining the number of Medicare beneficiaries who are enrolled in a fee-for-service (FFS) program. In this analysis, a FFS beneficiary is defined as being enrolled in Part A and/or Part B with a coverage type code equal to "9" (FFS coverage) for at least one month of the 12-month reference period. There must not be a death date for that month or a missing zip code for the beneficiary so that the beneficiary can be assigned to a county. Other public use data may define a FFS beneficiary using different criteria, such as requiring the beneficiary to be enrolled in the FFS program every month during the reference period.
Starting with Release 7 (
The Market Saturation and Utilization Tool does not include information on market saturation and utilization for Medicaid or private insurance. Dual eligible metrics are produced from Medicare claims data only and therefore do not incorporate Medicaid claims data.
The Market Saturation and Utilization Data Tool includes an interactive map that is color-coded based on an analysis that separates the distribution into the following categories of states/counties/CBSAs for the selected metric: lowest 25 percent, second lowest 25 percent, third lowest 25 percent, top 25 percent excluding extreme values, and extreme values. An extreme value is one that greatly differs from other values in its field (e.g., Number of Providers). Counties and CBSAs that are excluded from the analysis are colored gray in the interactive maps. The CBSA map is generated using the 2017 shapefile, which contains the same CBSAs as the 2018 file.
For those interested in states and counties affected by CMS' temporary provider enrollment moratoria during the reference periods for which data are available, the interactive map permits a visualization that identifies those states and counties. On
The State/County-level examples below utilize the
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
The CBSA example below utilizes the Ophthalmology service area data (selected for illustration purposes only). Similar maps can be created through the Data tool for all of the health service areas included in this release. CBSA data is refreshed annually and currently includes one reference period (
Map 1 displays the distribution of providers by state for the
Click here (https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/market-saturation-and-utilization-data-tool-5)
Similar maps can be created at the national- and state-level for the other metrics included in the Data Tool: Number of FFS Beneficiaries, Average Number of Users per Provider, Percentage of Users out of FFS Beneficiaries, Number of Users, Average Number of Providers per County, Number of Dual Eligible Users, Percentage of Dual Eligible Users out of Total Users, Percentage of Dual Eligible Users out of Dual Eligible FFS Beneficiaries, and Total Payment.
Map 3 shows the distribution of Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries by CBSA for the



Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: 2019 Federally-Facilitated Exchange Navigator Cooperative Agreement Awards
National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition Issues Statement on Whole Farm Revenue Protection Policy
Advisor News
- Advisors must lead the policy risk conversation
- Gen X more anxious than baby boomers about retirement
- Taxing trend: How the OBBBA is breaking the standard deduction reliance
- Why advisors can’t afford to delay succession planning
- 6 in 10 Americans struggle with financial decisions
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- CT commissioner: 70% of policyholders covered in PHL liquidation plan
- ‘I get confused:’ Regulators ponder increasing illustration complexities
- Three ways the Corebridge/Equitable merger could shake up the annuity market
- Corebridge, Equitable merge to create potential new annuity sales king
- LIMRA: Final retail annuity sales total $464.1 billion in 2025
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- BREAKING: MIKE ROGERS' HEALTH CARE PLAN INCLUDES NEW OUT-OF-POCKET COSTS AND HIGH-RISKS POOLS THAT INCREASE PREMIUMS
- Iowa Senate drops insurer, managed care limits from subacute mental health bill
- Lamont, Democrats divided on Connecticut Option health plan
- Lamont, Dems divided on Conn. Option health plan
- Many Virginians drop ACA coverage, SCC hears
Many Virginians drop ACA coverage and more likely will, SCC hears
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- WHAT THEY ARE SAYING: KATHLEEN COULOMBE JOINS ACU AS CHIEF ADVOCACY OFFICER
- A-CAP Appoints Kirk Cullimore as President of Sentinel Security Life
- Nationwide enters centennial year stronger than ever
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company and Its Subsidiaries
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of CMB Wing Lung Insurance Company Limited
More Life Insurance News