California Insurers Dispute Retroactive Part Of COVID-19 Testing Bill
An association of insurance companies filed a legal action asking a judge to invalidate a provision in Senate Bill 510 that requires health plans and health insurers to pay for workplace COVID-19 testing performed retroactively to March 4, 2020, when a state of emergency was declared due to the coronavirus.
The petition was brought Thursday in Los Angeles Superior Court by the Association of California Life and Health Insurance Companies against Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara and Attorney General Rob Bonta. The ACLHIC is a trade association representing six full-service insurers that provide health care coverage to approximately 2 million Californians through individual and group markets.
A state Department of Insurance representative issued a statement Friday morning in response to the petition.
“While the Department of Insurance is still reviewing the lawsuit and can’t comment specifically on it, testing without patient cost-sharing is critical to public health during this pandemic,” the statement read.
According to the petition, there is no public health justification for the bill’s retroactive mandates.
“ACLHIC members will likely suffer significant damages if ACLHIC’s claims alleged herein are not promptly addressed,” the petition states.
SB 510, signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom on Oct. 8, becomes effective Jan. 1 and requires health plans and health insurers to reimburse both in-network and out-of-network providers for COVID-19 testing and related services without any cost- sharing, prior authorization or other utilization management requirements.
SB 510 requires insurers to pay for COVID-19 testing of workers in a workplace setting even if they are asymptomatic and have no known exposure. The ACLHIC petition challenges SB 510’s retroactivity requirement as unconstitutional, but the association does not dispute the requirement to pay for COVID-19 testing of workers in a workplace setting when those tests are performed after Jan. 1.



ACLI: Pennsylvania Passes Annuity Sales Rules
Flight Delays and Cancellations Disrupt Holiday Travel
Advisor News
- The hidden flaw in insurance AI adoption for advisors and carriers
- Rising healthcare costs impact 401(k) accounts
- What advisors think about pooled employer plans, alternative investments
- AI, stablecoins and private market expansion may reshape financial services by 2030
- Cheers to summer, and planning for what comes next
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- MetLife Inc. (NYSE: MET) Climbs to New 52-Week High
- The Standard and Pacific Guardian Life Announce Entry into Agreement to Transition Individual Annuities Business
- AuguStar Retirement launches StarStream Variable Annuity
- Prismic Life Announces Completion of Oversubscribed Capital Raise
- Guaranteed income streams help preserve assets later in retirement
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Reduced health insurance payments for hospital births had a bigger impact on sterilization rates than correcting an injustice
- Here’s how one Bay Area healthcare CEO is navigating “challenging” times
- Hospitals sue CVS Health over 304B drug pricing program
- Brokers face a new reality in voluntary benefits
- GUZMAN EFFORT TO EXPAND MAMMOGRAM ACCESS TO ALL AGES PASSES SENATE
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Shocking death of Kyle Busch renews debate over IUL plan
- WoodmenLife launches final expense life insurance offering
- The Standard and Pacific Guardian Life Announce Entry into Agreement to Transition Individual Annuities Business
- Symetra Wins 2026 Shorty Award for ‘Plan Well, Play Well’ Social Media Campaign with Sue Bird
- Rehabilitator: PHL Variable liquidation payouts could exceed guaranty caps
More Life Insurance News