Australian Securities and Investments Commission: Federal Court Finds Auto & General Insurance Company Did Not Include an Unfair Contract Term in Its Insurance Contracts
The Federal Court has today found that a term requiring policy holders to notify
ASIC alleged that the term was unfair as ASIC considered it:
* imposes an obligation on customers to notify Auto & General if 'anything' changes about their home or contents (with a non-exhaustive list of examples), which imposes an unclear obligation on the customer regarding what they need to disclose to Auto & General.
* suggests that Auto & General has a broader right to refuse claims or reduce the amount payable under claims if the customer does not meet the notification obligation than is available under the Insurance Contracts Act.
* could mislead or confuse the customer as to their true obligations and rights under the contract.
ASIC Deputy Chair
ASIC is considering the judgment.
Download
Judgment (PDF 864 KB)
Background
On
* Auto &
* Budget Direct Your Home & Contents Insurance Policy PDS
* Australia Post Your Home & Contents Insurance Policy PDS
* ING Home & Contents Insurance Policy PDS
* Catch Insurance Your Home & Contents Insurance Policy PDS
*
*
The Auto &
Auto & General no longer issues new home and contents policies for the
On
On
* * *
Original text here: https://asic.gov.au/about-asic/news-centre/find-a-media-release/2024-releases/24-057mr-federal-court-finds-auto-general-insurance-company-did-not-include-an-unfair-contract-term-in-its-insurance-contracts#!type=media%20releases
NAIC President Andrew N. Mais – 'Not Everyone Gets a Chance to Help. We Do.'
Regulation FD Disclosure – Form 8-K
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News