Appeals court says Houston County, sheriff discriminated against transgender employee [The Macon Telegraph]
May 16—A federal appeals court has ruled that
Federal courts in
The case was initially handled by civil trial after the employee sued over the issue. A jury ruled in favor of
Judge
Trans employee felt 'support' prior to health care issue
Lange filed the lawsuit against the county in
She began as a patrol officer in 2006 for the county where she wore men's work clothes, went by her male birth name and responded to male pronouns until early 2017, when she was diagnosed with gender dysphoria by a health care provider. She informed Talton of her transition plans to start wearing women's clothing, use her female name, go by female pronouns and be openly female at work and was met with his "unspoken support," according to the lawsuit.
The lawsuit explains that the health care coverage by
However, it excludes services, supplies and medication if it's for a sex change, the lawsuit said.
"Excluding 'sex change' treatments is, by definition, an exclusion of gender transition treatments," Lange argued.
Lange had gone through feminizing breast surgery and hormone replacement therapy and they reduced her gender dysphoria, according to the document. With the help of her endocrinologist, two psychologists and a surgeon, she later decided to move forward with bottom surgery.
Before scheduling an appointment, she called
However, the complaint says that when the surgeon applied to the health coverage plan to pre-authorize the surgery in 2018, they denied it, explaining that sex change services were excluded.
Lange appealed the decision but was denied. When she appealed again,
However, she was told the exclusions would stay and agreed to be held responsible for any penalties, the complaint said.
In turn, Lange sued
The county attempted to get the case dismissed, arguing they did not violate her legal rights and abided by federal and state law. They also argued "any damages that plaintiff suffered were the direct and proximate result of her own actions or inactions, including, but not limited to, assumption of relevant risks."
Talton claimed government immunity under the 11th Amendment. Chief Judge
The federal court trial lasted for two days. The jury awarded Lange
The defendants asked Lange to post a bond in the amount of her surgery expenses, including drugs if she intended to go through the surgery during the appeal process, but the courts denied their request.
While the court did rule in Lange's favor, the ruling wasn't unanimous. Judge
"The reason is that the employer-provided health insurance plan here does not deny coverage to anyone because he or she is transgender," said Brasher. "The alleged problem with this plan is that it excludes coverage for sex change surgeries, not that it denies coverage to transgender people.
"On the face of this policy, it doesn't treat anyone differently based on sex, gender nonconformity, or transgender status."
While the court ruled in Lange's claim of sex discrimination, her claim for the county violating the equal protection clause is still pending trial.
___
(c)2024 The Macon Telegraph (Macon, Ga.)
Visit The Macon Telegraph (Macon, Ga.) at www.macon.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Chubb Ltd. (NYSE: CB) is a Leading Gainer in Thursday Morning Trading
NIA Pledges Collaboration With NAICOM for Consolidated Insurance Bill
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News