Appeals court: MML should pay Kalkaska claim in employee insurance case [The Record-Eagle, Traverse City, Mich.]
Sep. 10—KALKASKA —
Judges
That reverses a decision by
The nine-year saga stems from the village's decision in 2014 to end lifetime health benefits for retired village employees and their spouses. A trust fund covering those benefits ran out of money in 2011, and in 2014 village leaders opted to stop paying into it out of
Village employees and spouses Penny and
Attorneys for MML argued that the insurance policy doesn't cover an intentional breach of contract, while
Appeals court judges agreed, ruling that the policy insured
The judges were unmoved by MML's argument that
The village did agree to pay those benefits in a 1996 contract, the appeals court agreed. While MML argued that pre-existing obligation didn't become the insurer's after
"To conclude that plaintiff's obligation to pay its employees arose from its contractual obligation and not from its breach of its contractual obligation hints at sophistry," the judges wrote. "The obligation to pay damages under a contract only ever arises from breach of the contract; without a breach of the contract there are no damages and therefore no obligation to pay the damages. Moreover, that reasoning likely would preclude any claim anticipated under the policy."
Gadola, Maldonado and Murray sent the case back to
"We're very disappointed and we don't believe that it's a correct decision," he said. "This is the first time in the country that a court has made such a ruling regarding an employee benefits liability coverage."
"I know that the folks in
___
(c)2023 The Record-Eagle (Traverse City, Mich.)
Visit The Record-Eagle (Traverse City, Mich.) at record-eagle.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Insurance issues loom as California Legislature nears end of session
Kokua Line: Is cash aid for fire survivors taxable income? [The Honolulu Star-Advertiser]
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News