Whiplash Claims and the Rising Cost of Motor Insurance
| NewsRx |
It is often reported that the huge increase seen in the cost of car insurance can be blamed firmly on the cost to insurance companies of having to pay out on thousands of whiplash claims. For example, in 2010 to 2011 there were approximately 554,000 whiplash claims which accounted for almost 70 percent of all motor insurance injury claims. It is no wonder that people become increasingly concerned with the effect this having on their rising premiums.
In response to these concerns the Transport Select Committee has published a follow up report on the cost whiplash claims are having on the insurance industry, the difficulty in defining a whiplash injury and recommendations for how such claims should be dealt with in the future. The report highlights the complicated nature of a whiplash injury and whilst no-one is denying that such injuries are real and can severely affect those who are involved in an accident; it does recommend that compensation should only be awarded where clear objective evidence of a real injury is provided. The Committee believes that the bar for proving whiplash should be raised and claimants put to strict proof as to their injury. However, the law as it stands requires claimants to prove their claim and therefore prove that they have suffered injury. This is achieved through the provision of medical reports prepared by qualified doctors. The committee goes on to state that should legal reforms not reduce the number of claims then the government should introduce primary legislation to curb the increasing number of claims.
From this it is clear that the government is intent on driving down the number of people who claim for whiplash injuries. This is reinforced by the media who seem to vilify those who make a claim. However, the blame for increasing insurance policies does not lie solely with those who make whiplash injury claims. The Transport Select Committee has also reported on referral fees and accused the insurance industry of encouraging claims through the payment and acceptance of referral fees in which, insurers sell information about customers who have been involved in accidents to solicitors who then encourage them to make claims. There is also the cost of the accident repairs and hire cars which insurance companies help to spiral out of control.
Following the attention created by both the media and the Transport Select Committee to the rising cost of car insurance the
By looking at the matter as a whole we can see that those making a claim for whiplash as a result of an accident that is not their fault, cannot be held solely responsible for the rising cost of insurance. Even the Transport Select Committee have concluded that there are numerous factors affecting the cost of motor insurance and tackling some in isolation would not be guaranteed to bring premiums down. It should not be the case that those who have been in an accident that is not their fault and suffered injury should have their access to justice restricted when there are so many other issues to consider. The select committee itself commented that 'Where someone can demonstrate that they have suffered an injury, including whiplash, as a result of a road traffic accident for which they were not fully liable they should be able to claim and receive compensation'.
Whilst the cost of our insurance premiums is clearly an issue that affects us all, claimants should not be vilified for exercising their legal right and insurance companies should take their share of the responsibility by helping to bring the cost of insurance premiums down.
If you have been in a motor accident that is not your fault, suffered an injury and want to discuss making a claim then please call First Personal Injury and speak to one of our highly experienced team.
| Copyright: | (c) 2012 Investment Weekly News via VerticalNews.com |
| Wordcount: | 776 |



Uninsured and Underinsured Motorists Coverage and Technology Solutions Discussed in New ACE Progress Report
Advisor News
- Advisors must lead the policy risk conversation
- Gen X more anxious than baby boomers about retirement
- Taxing trend: How the OBBBA is breaking the standard deduction reliance
- Why advisors can’t afford to delay succession planning
- 6 in 10 Americans struggle with financial decisions
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- CT commissioner: 70% of policyholders covered in PHL liquidation plan
- ‘I get confused:’ Regulators ponder increasing illustration complexities
- Three ways the Corebridge/Equitable merger could shake up the annuity market
- Corebridge, Equitable merge to create potential new annuity sales king
- LIMRA: Final retail annuity sales total $464.1 billion in 2025
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- An uninsurance bomb is about to go off, and it will touch Orange County
- Many Virginians drop ACA coverage
- Legislature advances bill limiting copays for Medicaid
- Beshear critical of Medicaid provisions in state budget bill
- Advocates call for hearing about Geisinger-Risant insurance condition change request
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- WHAT THEY ARE SAYING: KATHLEEN COULOMBE JOINS ACU AS CHIEF ADVOCACY OFFICER
- A-CAP Appoints Kirk Cullimore as President of Sentinel Security Life
- Nationwide enters centennial year stronger than ever
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company and Its Subsidiaries
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of CMB Wing Lung Insurance Company Limited
More Life Insurance News