TABS Group Study Identifies Strong Opposition to Health Care Reform Law
"We found the strong opposition to the law, in general, to be surprising," commented
When total Favorables vs. Unfavorables are compared, there is still opposition to the law, but the differences are not as extreme: 26% Favorable (Very or Somewhat Favorable, often called Top 2 Box score) vs. 48% Unfavorable (Very or Somewhat Unfavorable, often called Bottom 2 Box Score).
"Every segment of the population we reviewed is against the law, except one: Vitamin Buyers purchasing the category at Health Food stores. This group had a Top 2 Box score of 45% vs. Bottom 2 Box score of 32%, but even their commitment gap was negative: 19% Very Favorable vs. 25% Very Unfavorable," stated Jetta.
Other notable findings of the research:
- There was a strong correlation between negativity to the law and usage of Supplements. Only 24% of Non-Buyers were Unfavorable, whereas 50% of the Very Heavy Buyers (9% of US Population; 13% of Category Users, and 40% of Category Sales) were Very Unfavorable.
- Age was also a strong predictor of strong negativity, but not as much as heavy supplement usage. 45% of those Age 60+ were Very Unfavorable to the Health Care law.
- The highest level of Very Favorable respondents was only at 14%, Americans aged 50-59 years.
- Men are more likely to be Very Unfavorable than women (36% to 28%), but the level of Very Favorable between the two is roughly the same (9% vs. 8%).
- The level of ambivalence to the law is highest in the Northeast, where only 28% have a strong opinion one way or the other. By contrast, the West is 37%, Central is 38% and South is 49% of respondents saying Very Favorable or Unfavorable.
"My hypothesis on the correlation between supplement usage and negativity to the Health Care law is that supplement usage is a proxy measurement of the extent to which people are reliant on their own health vs. those looking for external support for health care issues," commented Dr. Jetta.
"From a political standpoint, I believe it is extremely problematic for lawmakers to have an issue where the demographic group with the highest level of voting participation (Age 60+) is the one with the strongest level of opposition to this high visibility law."
About
The Vitamin Usage study was conducted among 1,000 representative respondents aged 18-75 in the TNS panel. The study was fielded from
Available Topic Expert(s): For information on the listed expert(s), click appropriate link.
Dr.
SOURCE


A.M. Best Affirms Ratings of Selective Insurance Group, Inc. and Its Subsidiaries; Maintains Negative Outlook
Advisor News
- CT governor’s candidates claims: What’s true, and what’s misleading
- Retaining clients by giving them a memorable experience
- Addressing the longevity paradox
- Employers shift focus from retirement access to financial outcomes
- Helping widowed clients navigate their new financial reality
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- National Life Group expands annuity portfolio
- AM Best to Join Life/Annuity Insurance-Focused Panel Discussion at Capitol Forum Event
- USAA Earns No. 1 Ranking in JD Power Individual Annuity Study for the Third Consecutive Year
- How flexible annuities fit today’s retirement portfolios
- Foresters Financial appoints Tom Ross as chief distribution officer for U.S. annuity sales
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Conn. remembers Wyman as trailblazer, mentor
- Wyman remembered as barrier-breaking political pioneer
- Wyman remembered as trailblazer, mentor
- Reports Outline OBGYN and Reproduction Study Findings from Health Care Cost Institute (Hospital Bypass Among Rural Obstetric Patients With Commercial Health Insurance): OBGYN and Reproduction
- Madison Faces Higher Library and Health Insurance Costs as Officials Look Ahead to 2027 Budget
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News