Agency Information Collection Activities: Announcement of Board Approval Under Delegated Authority and Submission to OMB
| Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. |
Citation: "77 FR 76484"
"Notices"
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the final approval of a proposed information collection by the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Federal Reserve Board Clearance Officer--Cynthia Ayouch--Division of Research and Statistics,
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (TDD) users may contact (202) 263-4869,
OMB Desk Officer--
Final approval under OMB delegated authority the implementation of the following report:
Report title: The Banking Organization Systemic Risk Report.
Agency form number: FR
OMB Control number: 7100-0352.
Effective Date: The FR
FOOTNOTE 1 See Update of group of global systemically important banks (G-SIBs), available at http://www.financialstabilityboard.org/publications/r_121031ac.pdf. END FOOTNOTE
Frequency: Annual.
Reporters: BHCs with over
Estimated annual reporting hours: 55,400 hours.
Estimated average hours per response: Implementation: U.S. G-SIBs, 1,000 hours; all other BHCs, 1,500 hours; Ongoing: 300 hours for U.S. G-SIBs and all other BHCs.
Number of respondents: 33.
General description of report: This information collection is mandatory pursuant to section 5 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1844(c)). Individual respondent data are not considered confidential and will be made available publicly via the
Abstract: The FR
Current Actions: On
Summary of Comments
The Federal Reserve received four comment letters on the proposed implementation of the FR
Detailed Discussion of Public Comments and Federal Reserve Responses
A.
The Federal Reserve proposed that the new FR
BHCs
Commenters representing U.S. BHCs stated that the proposed reporting requirements would be unduly burdensome for certain BHCs and asserted that they should only apply to U.S. BHCs that have already participated in the G-SIB data collection process sponsored by the BCBS. Moreover, these commenters stated that information used to identify D-SIBs or assess the systemic risk implications of mergers and acquisitions should be gathered through separate data collections tailored to those purposes instead of being combined with the data collection process used for G-SIB identification and surcharge determination. The commenters also stated that the FR
In addition to (i) identifying institutions which may be designated as D-SIBs under a future framework and (ii) analyzing the systemic risk implications of proposed mergers and acquisitions, the Federal Reserve plans to use the FR
Consistent with the concerns raised by commenters, the Federal Reserve recognizes that smaller BHCs subject to DFA section 165 which have not previously participated in international data collections such as the Quantitative Impact Study (QIS) may require additional time to collect and audit the FR
FOOTNOTE 2 See, Update of group of global systemically important banks (G-SIBs), available at http://www.financialstabilityboard.org/publications/r_121031ac.pdf. END FOOTNOTE
SLHCs
Commenters expressed concerns about subjecting SLHCs to the proposed FR
FOOTNOTE 3 See 76 FR 22662. END FOOTNOTE
Several commenters questioned whether the Federal Reserve has the authority to collect the data in the proposed FR
The Federal Reserve has authority under HOLA to collect information from SLHCs. HOLA provides that, to the extent possible, the Federal Reserve is required to use reports and other supervisory information that the SLHC or its subsidiaries have provided to other federal or state regulators, externally audited financial statements, and information that is available publically. /4/
FOOTNOTE 4 12 U.S.C. 1467a(b)(2). END FOOTNOTE
The Federal Reserve has recently proposed applying consolidated capital requirements to all SLHCs pursuant to DFA section 171 and the safety and soundness provisions of HOLA. /5/ The proposed capital requirements have received significant comment from SLHCs--especially with respect to insurance operations--and the comments and proposals are currently under review by the Federal Reserve. Considering the reporting burden and the fact that the proposed capital requirements may be revised, the Federal Reserve will exempt SLHCs from filing the FR
FOOTNOTE 5 See 77 FR 52792 (
FBOs
One commenter cited the difficulties in calculating the combined U.S. operations of FBOs due to differences in accounting standards and the proposed atypical segmentation of their business operations. The commenter questioned the need for collecting FBO data because most, if not all, of the reporting FBOs already participate in the annual G-SIB assessment via their home jurisdiction. Another commenter further suggested that FBOs be exempted from reporting the FR
After considering these comments, the Federal Reserve will exempt FBOs from filing the FR
B. Submission Deadlines
The proposal included a submission date of 45 days after the
Another commenter stated that the proposed FR
C. Attestation Requirement
The Federal Reserve proposed that the reporting entity's Chief Financial Officer (CFO) sign and attest the FR
Considering these comments, the Federal Reserve will allow institutions to provide reasonable estimates for their initial FR
FOOTNOTE 6 It is noted that, in any case, it is a federal violation to enter false information in a BHC's reports with the intent to defraud or deceive the Federal Reserve. See 15 U.S.C. 1005. END FOOTNOTE
Furthermore, having considered the comments, the Federal Reserve will revise the FR
D. Confidentiality
Several commenters expressed concern about the proposal's requirement that all FR
The proposal to make FR
FOOTNOTE 7 See Global systemically important banks: Assessment methodology and the additional loss absorbency requirement, paragraph 72, available at http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs207.pdf. END FOOTNOTE
Accordingly, FR
E. Use of U.S. GAAP
Several commenters stated that the Federal Reserve should not require certain respondents to report based on U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). One commenter suggested that the report accommodate for differences between International Financial Reporting Standards and GAAP since FBOs do not maintain or report standalone GAAP data for their U.S. operations. Two commenters noted that SLHCs predominantly engaged in insurance activities do not prepare financial statements in accordance with GAAP. They suggested that systemic risk is better measured for these institutions using the more conservative and industry-specific Statutory Accounting Principles (SAP). Several commenters also indicated that converting values from SAP to GAAP would involve a considerable amount of time and resources. As mentioned above, the Federal Reserve is removing SLHCs and FBOs from the reporting panel at this time. As the reporting panel has been narrowed to only BHCs, the Federal Reserve will retain the GAAP reporting requirement.
F. Duplicative Data Collection Efforts
Several commenters stated that the FR
FOOTNOTE 8 See 77 FR 21637. END FOOTNOTE
G. Data Items
One commenter noted that several data items differ from the information collected in the last G-SIB exercise. The Federal Reserve notes that the FR
The Federal Reserve also notes that an additional data item has been added to the payments section that captures payments made in all other currencies not specifically listed. This additional data item provides insight into the true payments activity of the respondent by capturing payments made outside of the major global currencies. Furthermore, the list of currencies collected as part of the G-SIB methodology is subject to change in the future, so it is recommended that institutions build their systems such that they can capture more than just the twelve currencies indicated. The Federal Reserve will retain this additional payments data item.
Several commenters stated that some data items on the FR
The Federal Reserve acknowledges that the LCR has not yet been implemented in
Two commenters raised concerns about the difficulty of reporting gross payments activity, as payments are cleared using numerous internal systems and some are only recorded on a net basis. Considering the difficulty associated with aggregating the payments data, the Federal Reserve will allow reporting of reasonable estimates for the payments panel by requiring attestation of only a specified number of significant figures. Furthermore, should the precise data be unavailable, the Federal Reserve will allow known overestimates to be reported. Finally, due to the calculation burden associated with providing the subset of payments made on behalf of other institutions, the Federal Reserve will remove these data items from the FR
Commenters asked for a number of clarifications regarding specific data items on the proposed FR
H. Burden Estimate
Several commenters believed that the 180 hour burden estimate vastly underestimated the actual burden on firms, especially those firms that are currently subject to Basel I and have never participated in an international data collection. The Federal Reserve concurs and, as noted above, proposes phasing in smaller BHCs so as to allow additional time for collection and auditing of their initial FR
Robert deV. Frierson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2012-31179 Filed 12-27-12;
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
| Copyright: | (c) 2012 Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. |
| Wordcount: | 3902 |


Private Equity Firm Completes $2.3 Billion USI Acquisition
Advisor News
- The missing piece in most retirement plans
- Clients are bringing TikTok insurance advice into advisor meetings
- Embracing a family-centric approach to financial planning
- Family communication: Financial planning’s growing blind spot
- Americans aren’t turning retirement plans into action, LIMRA finds
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Cayman Islands premier to meet with U.S. reinsurance regulators
- Investigation finds deceptive sales, churning of annuities targeting postal workers
- Corebridge annuity sales slip ahead of Equitable marriage
- California teachers settle class-action lawsuit over in-plan annuity fees
- Jackson Financial CEO caps 40-year career with blockbuster Q2
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- ‘You’ll never get that information’: Inside the brutal PBM exam process
- Cuts to healthcare access harm us all
- Arizona, others sue feds over rule many say cuts health care costs
- Healey announces campaign to help residents hold onto their healthcare coverage
- State agency seeks
waiver to reinstate
HIP cost-sharing
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Symetra Named to PEOPLE® Companies That Care™ List for Second Consecutive Year
- LIMRA: Individual life sales continue growth trend in Q2, led by whole life and VUL
- New York Life Awards 20 Golden Futures Scholarships, Expanding Student Support Through Financial Education and Career Development
- Built to Last: Winston-Salem—a quiet industrial powerhouse
- The silver economy ushers in a new era of life insurance growth
More Life Insurance News