ACOG Statement on the Supreme Court Decision on Hobby Lobby v Burwell
| Targeted News Service |
"
"This decision inappropriately allows employers to interfere in women's health care decisions. All health care decisions - including decisions about contraception - should be made by a woman and her doctor, based on the patient's needs and her current health. Her employer's religious beliefs should not overrule her doctor's advice.
"Moreover, contraceptives are essential health care for women and should not be treated differently than other, equally important parts of comprehensive care for women, including well-woman visits, preconception care visits, cervical and breast cancer screenings, and other needed health care services.
"The value of family planning - including contraception - has been clearly demonstrated. The ability of a woman to time and space her children reduces infant, child, and maternal morbidity and mortality, and can lead to more optimal health outcomes for mother and for baby. Of course, contraception also prevents unintended pregnancy. This is absolutely essential in America, where nearly one half of all pregnancies are unintended.
"Because access to contraception is essential women's health care, the College supported the government's position in these cases by submitting amicus briefs to the
"Moving past this decision, we will remain vigilant about state legislators who may feel emboldened by the Court's actions. State lawmakers must not see this decision as a green light to roll back essential insurance coverage gains made across the states over the past two decades. Women's physicians will continue to stand in strong support of state laws guaranteeing equitable coverage for our patients' health care needs.
"America's obstetricians and gynecologists are committed to promoting the health of women. However, barriers to access, like the one confirmed by the
[Category: Medical]
CC AutoTriage10PkS-140701-30TacordaCheng-4783483 30TacordaCheng
| Copyright: | (c) 2014 Targeted News Service |
| Wordcount: | 413 |



Advisor News
- Pay or Die: The scare tactics behind LA County’s Measure ER tax increase
- How to listen to what your client isn’t saying
- Strong underwriting: what it means for insurers and advisors
- Retirement is increasingly defined by a secure income stream
- Addressing the ‘menopause tax:’ A guide for advisors with female clients
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- MassMutual turns 175, Marking Generations of Delivering on its Commitments
- ALIRT Insurance Research: U.S. Life Insurance Industry In Transition
- My Annuity Store Launches a Free AI Annuity Research Assistant Trained on 146 Carrier Brochures and Live Annuity Rates
- Ameritas settles with Navy vet in lawsuit over disputed annuity sale
- NAIC annuity guidance updates divide insurance and advisory groups
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- GLP-1 Drug Costs Cited as Heights Schools Hike Taxes and Cut Staff
- Pay or Die: The scare tactics behind LA County’s Measure ER tax increase
- Column: N.C.’s Medicaid ‘compromise’ comes at a cruel cost
- Idaho farmers can band together to buy cheaper health insurance through Farm Bureau deal
- HHS NOTICE OF BENEFIT AND PAYMENT PARAMETERS FOR 2027 FINAL RULE
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- 2025 Insurance Abstracts
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Berkshire Hathaway Life Insurance Company of Nebraska and First Berkshire Hathaway Life Insurance Company
- Generational expectations: A challenge for the industry
- Greg Lindberg asks NC judge for no jail time in bribery, fraud cases
- National Life Group Names Brenda Betts to Its Board of Directors
More Life Insurance News