5 Outcomes Of Changing Health Care Regulation
By Sally Poblete
The Trump administration continues to take steps to weaken the Affordable Care Act (ACA), but it’s still not clear what the future of health care looks for Americans.
In December 2017, President Donald Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that repeals the individual mandate penalty. After the repeal, new propositions are coming from the Trump administration, such as loosening the regulation on association health plans (AHPs) and short-term insurance. As debate continues to unfold, here are the five high-level trends we may expect in the months ahead, and how stakeholders could be affected.
1. Healthy people may start leaving the individual market.
Recent changes eliminate the penalty for not having health insurance. Under the ACA, consumers were charged a penalty for the year they lacked coverage. But now, when consumers file their taxes, they won’t be charged a penalty. Without the penalty, younger and healthier consumers may choose to not have individual coverage.
The premiums received from healthy people are generally a great hedge for the unhealthier, or higher-risk, populations for carriers. In the short term, with the changes occurring in the individual market, carriers can expect a worsening loss ratio: the ratios paid by the premiums to the insurance company to cover settled claims begin to decrease. In the long term, with the risk pool looking worse, carriers may concentrate on boosting their sales in relatively more stable segments.
2. Concerns about pre-existing conditions.
The Trump administration formally proposed to allow insurers to sell short-term plans that would last for up to one year. Such plans can deny coverage for pre-existing conditions and don’t have to cover all of the essential benefits that previously included preventive and wellness services, mental health, maternity and prescription drugs. Even though these plans aren’t exactly new, the regulation limited these plans to 90 days under the Obama administration. Furthermore, they would not count towards the individual mandate.
3. Employer-sponsored coverage will be critical for employee retention.
If the ACA’s employer mandate is repealed, small businesses may no longer be required to provide affordable, minimum-value coverage to their full-time employees to avoid penalties. That being said, with many people losing their individual health coverage, employees may increasingly expect health coverage from their employers.
Employer-sponsored benefits have always played a critical role in attracting and retaining talent, but, with the current instability in the market, many employees will appreciate the security of an employer-sponsored coverage plan more than ever.
4. Increased availability of association health plans.
To increase the availability of AHPs, the administration proposes to adopt a new definition of “employer” for purposes of determining when employers can join together to offer or enroll in an AHP . By doing so, the government is aiming for small businesses, professional associations and others to unite together to buy insurance coverage as if they were a large business.
Even though looser regulation on AHPs can increase options for getting coverage, we can expect such plans to cover much less than the ACA sought to make national standard. AHP can be a good alternative for younger and healthier segments of the population, but having such demographics opt out of theACA markets might once again be alarming for people who actually need coverage.
5. States may have increasing regulatory power.
States may gain further flexibility to develop new health care models, including changes to affordability and choices offered. A number of states are pushing for their own legislation that could potentially give additional protection to residents beyond the federal level. Keep an eye on states like New York and California, which seek to create programs to increase benefits and requirements set by the ACA.
Sally Poblete is CEO of Wellthie, a provider of technology to help brokers and insurance carriers.


Mark Klein: ‘I find myself in many cases being a life coach’ in his taxing job
Advisor News
- Embracing a family-centric approach to financial planning
- Family communication: Financial planning’s growing blind spot
- Americans aren’t turning retirement plans into action, LIMRA finds
- Ashley Hinson ‘death tax’ story collides with truth
- How advisors can prepare clients for an uncertain retirement landscape
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Investigation finds deceptive sales, churning of annuities targeting postal workers
- Corebridge annuity sales slip ahead of Equitable marriage
- California teachers settle class-action lawsuit over in-plan annuity fees
- Jackson Financial CEO caps 40-year career with blockbuster Q2
- Lumos Insurance introduces the Immediate Care Plan to help families fund long-term care
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Medicare Reset Series 2027, Part 2: Difference between Supplements and Advantage Plans explained.
- California sets aside $250 million for public hospitals. Bay Area officials say it falls far short
- Louisiana hospitals see sharp uptick in uninsured patients after Obamacare subsidies expired
- Louisiana hospitals see sharp uptick in uninsured patients after Obamacare subsidies expired
- CareScout Redefines Worksite Long-Term Care Insurance With a Solution That Goes Further for Employers and Employees
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Built to Last: Winston-Salem—a quiet industrial powerhouse
- The silver economy ushers in a new era of life insurance growth
- Family communication: Financial planning’s growing blind spot
- Indiana eyes more oversight of insurance companies' exposure to private credit
- HEALEY-DRISCOLL ADMINISTRATION RETURNS $14.5 MILLION TO HEALTH AND DENTAL INSURANCE CONSUMERS AND BUSINESSES
More Life Insurance News