Supreme Court will hear challenge to ACA preventive care mandate
The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to hear a broad challenge to the Affordable Care Act’s coverage of preventive services in its upcoming term.
If the court rules in favor of the conservative Texas employers who filed the case, tens of millions of people who get their health insurance from their employer or through the ACA marketplace would be impacted by the removal of a preventative services requirement. Removing this requirement would erode the coverage of tens of millions of people whose insurers currently cover the full cost of everything from vaccines to birth control.
In June, the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a Christian-owned business can’t be compelled to cover preventive medications as is required under the ACA. However, the court also determined a Texas judge carried out an “abuse of discretion” in his prior ruling by blocking federal agencies from enforcing the rule universally.
The decision in Braidwood Management v. Becerra affirmed a lower court’s ruling that the secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services could not force Braidwood Management to abide by a preventive care mandate in the ACA. The court rejected another ruling, however, and remanded another one back to the lower courts. The mandate remained in place while the case continued to work its way to the Supreme Court.
At issue is a provision in the ACA that requires private health insurers and companies to cover preventive services and drugs like HIV preventive drugs, known as PrEP. The provision also requires coverage of cancer screenings, vaccines, STD screenings, gestational health screenings and birth control.
Braidwood contended that this requirement violated the company’s religious freedom and beliefs.
Judge Reed O’Connor of U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, struck down the provision in September 2022. The appeals court said in the last week’s ruling that it believed blocking the federal government from enforcing this mandate across the board was an “error” and “an abuse of discretion.”
However, the appeals court also determined other arguments had yet to be fully decided and should be subject to further review in the lower courts.
One issue left to be decided is whether the U.S. Preventive Task Force that decides which services must be covered under the ACA is constitutionally sound.
The ACA specifies four main categories of preventive care for all adults as well as for women and children in particular:
- Services with an A or B rating in the current recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
- Immunizations recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.
- Preventive care and screenings for infants, children, and adolescents in comprehensive guidelines supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration.
- Preventive care and screenings for women’s health specified in the HRSA guidelines.
© Entire contents copyright 2025 by InsuranceNewsNet.com Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this article may be reprinted without the expressed written consent from InsuranceNewsNet.com.



Private equity firms put profits over patients, Senate panel says
House GOP considers $5T in possible spending cuts
Advisor News
- Different generations are hopeful about their future, despite varied goals
- Geopolitical instability and risk raise fears of Black Swan scenarios
- Structured Note Investors Recover $1.28M FINRA Award Against Fidelity
- Market reports turn economic trends into a strategic edge for advisors
- SEC in ‘active and detailed’ settlement talks with accused scammer Tai Lopez
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Life Insurance and Annuity Providers Score High Marks from Financial Pros, but Lag on User Friendliness, JD Power Finds
- An Application for the Trademark “TACTICAL WEIGHTING” Has Been Filed by Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company: Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company
- Annexus and Americo Announce Strategic Partnership with Launch of Americo Benchmark Flex Fixed Indexed Annuity Suite
- Rethinking whether annuities are too late for older retirees
- Advising clients wanting to retire early: how annuities can bridge the gap
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- What Idaho Senate just did about mini-hospital firm accused of ‘excessive’ rates
- Inmates exiting Green Hill, Echo Glen now eligible for expanded health care coverage
- AM Best to Host Briefing on Negative Pressures on U.S Health Insurance Segment and Whether an Inflection Point has Arrived
- Long-Term Care Insurance: A lifeline or a financial nightmare for seniors?
- New CEO at major health insurer with 3K CT employees. ‘Excited to build on our strong foundation’
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- ASK THE LAWYER: Your beneficiary designations are probably wrong
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Cincinnati Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
- NAIFA and Brokers Ireland launch global partnership
- Life Insurance and Annuity Providers Score High Marks from Financial Pros, but Lag on User Friendliness, JD Power Finds
- Reimagining life insurance to close the coverage gap
More Life Insurance News