Sweeping changes affecting financial advice for retirement accounts will force thousands of agents and financial advisors to consider errors and omissions coverage or leave the business, a former Department of Labor investigator said.
To Continue reading the rest of this article, Please click here to go to AdvisorNews.com.
AdBlocker Detected
We have detected that you are using an adblocker. The revenue we earn by advertisements allows us to publish quality content on InsuranceNewsNet.com.
If you wish to enjoy our content, please disable your adblocker and click the button below.
We hope you choose to whitelist our website and enjoy the content our team works hard to publish.
Cyril, most insurance professionals have been required to carry E&O by the carriers they represent for at least a decade or longer. It is a pre-requisite for licensing with most life and annuity carriers, and has been for some time. Further, I ran a Broker/Dealer and a RIA firm for almost 2 decades and know that the vast majority of firms (like ours) mandated E&O coverage as a pre-requisite for doing business. In the litigious society we live in today, going without E&O is not a smart business decision.
The concern is not that E&O will be required, as in most cases it already is. The REAL concern is the cost of E&O going forward for the financial professional – can they afford the premiums. Insurance only professionals can purchase E&O coverage for about $600 a year. For a B/D or RIA Rep, its between $1500 and $2000 a year. Given the increased exposure producers will have under the DOL Rule, the exposure to an E&O carrier will also increase – resulting in a significant rise in premiums.
A secondary concern will be the caveats the E&O carriers place in their policies. For example, if securities fraud is alleged in a lawsuit, many E&O carriers will not cover the claim (as they frequently exclude certain acts like this). So a financial professional may have E&O, but the limitations and restrictions are such that the E&O carrier collects premiums but is able to escape the obligation to pay a claim and defend the financial professional who has been named as a defendant in a lawsuit.
Given the onerous obligations of the BIC Exemption, and the potential for class-action status in litigation, the liability exposure of the financial professional significantly increases, as does the exposure for the E&O carrier As insurance is subject to risk-based pricing, the cost of coverage will naturally increase as does the potential risk being covered. The unintended consequence could be the pricing of E&O policies in a post DOL world could price many insurance professiionals out of the business.