Connecticut Judge Rules Against Nurses In Aetna Claims Case
The Second Circuit appeals court recently sided with Aetna insurance company in a case brought by a nurse who handled claims for the company and argued she was eligible for overtime pay.
The case -- Isett et al. v. Aetna Life Insurance Company -- was brought by Sharon Isett, a registered nurse charged with reviewing Aetna's claim denials. Since she performed non-clinical functions outside her professional job duties, Isett argued that she is entitled to overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
The FLSA exempts professional employees from overtime pay. There were more than 20 other Nurse Consultants who had opted into the suit and their claims were dismissed as well. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals decision affirmed a lower court ruling for Aetna.
The appellate court concluded that the professional exemption, which requires “specialized intellectual instruction” in a field of “science or learning” applied because the named plaintiff used that specialized knowledge as a RN in conducting these reviews.
Isett's primary duty “as a nurse consultant requires the discretion and judgment characteristic of registered nursing — the ability to act independently, or under limited supervision, on the basis of collected clinical data," the court concluded. "Accordingly, we conclude that Isett’s job required the use of advanced knowledge, thereby satisfying the first prong of the primary duty test.”
The Isett case is "a strong indicator" that courts expect FLSA’s exemptions "to be construed narrowly," wrote Gregory V. Mersol of the law firm Baker Hostetler. "Whether in collective action litigation or otherwise, employers will now have a less uneven playing field in establishing statutory exemptions."
InsuranceNewsNet Senior Editor John Hilton has covered business and other beats in more than 20 years of daily journalism. John may be reached at [email protected]. Follow him on Twitter @INNJohnH.
© Entire contents copyright 2020 by InsuranceNewsNet.com Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this article may be reprinted without the expressed written consent from InsuranceNewsNet.com.
InsuranceNewsNet Senior Editor John Hilton has covered business and other beats in more than 20 years of daily journalism. John may be reached at [email protected]. Follow him on Twitter @INNJohnH.




Marriage Taking A Backseat To Financial Security
Rolling Stones Tour Again Under Alliance For Lifetime Income Banner
Advisor News
- Industry groups applaud House passage of Financial Exploitation Prevention Act
- Younger workers more likely to be eligible for a retirement plan after changing jobs
- Bank of America community event unpacks sales tax hike, small business struggles
- CONGRESSMAN VALADAO DEMANDS ANSWERS FROM CALIFORNIA OVER HEALTHCARE TAX HIKE
- How executive benefits impact an estate plan
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- State Farm’s agency overhaul: What distribution can learn
- IRI, ACLI express support for CLEAR Forms Act
- A new era at the Federal Reserve
- Globe Life Inc. (NYSE: GL) Making Surprising Moves in Tuesday Session
- Why annuities are gaining traction with younger investors
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Maryland health insurers want to raise premiums an average 13.7% for individual plans in 2027
- Maryland health insurance rates could rise 13.7% in 2027 under proposal
- Millions drop Obamacare health coverage after subsidies expire and costs rise
- Improving how we deliver healthcare in Idaho
- Healthcare system needs a public option
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Misr Insurance Company
- State Farm’s agency overhaul: What distribution can learn
- They Allegedly Enrolled People In Life Insurance Without Consent. Then Death Claims Paid Out
- How much do state residents need to retire comfortably?
- How executive benefits impact an estate plan
More Life Insurance News