Federal Acquisition Regulation; Defense Base Act
| Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. |
SUMMARY: DoD, GSA, and
DATES: Interested parties should submit written comments to the Regulatory Secretariat at one of the addressees shown below on or before
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in response to FAR Case 2012-016 by any of the following methods:
* Regulations.gov: http://www.regulations.gov. Submit comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by searching for "FAR Case 2012-016." Select the link "Submit a Comment" that corresponds with "FAR Case 2012-016." Follow the instructions provided at the "Submit a Comment" screen. Please include your name, company name (if any), and "FAR Case 2012-016" on your attached document.
* Fax: 202-501-4067.
* Mail:
Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite FAR Case 2012-016, in all correspondence related to this case. All comments received will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal and/or business confidential information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DoD, GSA, and
II. Discussion and Analysis
The Defense Base Act of 1941, codified at 42 U.S.C.
Therefore, this action proposes to revise FAR clause 52.228-3,
This rule reflects statutory and DOL requirements, and does not impose additional burdens beyond those requirements.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not subject to review under Section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD, GSA, and
However, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) has been prepared consistent with 5 U.S.C. 603, and is summarized as follows:
This rule amends the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to clarify contractor and subcontractor responsibilities to obtain workers' compensation insurance or to qualify as a self-insurer, and other requirements, under the terms of the
The objective of the rule is to amend FAR clause 52.228-3,
DoD,
The proposed rule imposes no reporting, recordkeeping, or other information collection requirements than what are already required to be reported to the
The Regulatory Secretariat has submitted a copy of the IRFA to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
DoD, GSA, and
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The proposed rule does not contain any new information collection requirements that require the approval of the
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 52
Government procurement.
Dated:
Director,
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and
PART 52--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 51 U.S.C. 20113.
2. Revise section 52.228-3 to read as follows:
52.228-3
As prescribed in 28.309(a), insert the following clause:
(a) The Contractor shall--
(1) Before commencing performance under this contract, establish provisions to provide for the payment of disability compensation and medical benefits to covered employees and death benefits to their eligible survivors, by purchasing workers' compensation insurance or qualifying as a self-insurer under the
--This is a summary of a
Proposed rule.
CFR Part: "48 CFR Part 52"
RIN Number: "RIN 9000-AM50"
Citation: "78 FR 17176"
Document Number: "FAR Case 2012-016; Docket 2012-0016; Sequence 1"
Federal Register Page Number: "17176"
"Proposed Rules"
| Copyright: | (c) 2013 Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. |
| Wordcount: | 1405 |


Federal Acquisition Regulation; Defense Base Act
Advisor News
- Nearly half of nonretirees doubt they will fully retire
- How much could failure to fund Social Security cost average Americans?
- How can more Americans achieve financial independence?
- Savers vs. spenders: How money management attitudes impact financial confidence
- Demonstrating the value of life insurance to Gen Z
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- DOL slams pension risk transfer lawsuit as ‘opportunistic’ litigation
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of New York Life Insurance Company and Its Subsidiaries
- Advisors don’t have an annuity problem; they have an integration problem.
- Agentic AI is transforming insurance sales both for consumers and agents
- Canvas steps into the direct-to-consumer market that has yet to take off
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Here’s what Rep. Goldman’s bipartisan bill for health insurance transparency does
- Cigna Healthcare expands AI-enabled personalized support
- Insurers hedge on Trump-backed pledge to improve denials process
- Tips for life, health insurance for military members, families
- Health insurers use a whole arsenal of tools to deny care, increase profit
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of New York Life Insurance Company and Its Subsidiaries
- Agentic AI is transforming insurance sales both for consumers and agents
- USAA introduces Secure Start whole life program for children
- Best’s Market Segment Report: AM Best Maintains Stable Outlook on South Korea’s Non-Life Insurance Market
- Horace Mann Strengthens Customer Relationships and Accelerates Long-Term Growth Through Transactions with Medical Mutual of Ohio
More Life Insurance News