Federal Acquisition Regulation; Defense Base Act
| Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. |
SUMMARY: DoD, GSA, and
DATES: Interested parties should submit written comments to the Regulatory Secretariat at one of the addressees shown below on or before
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in response to FAR Case 2012-016 by any of the following methods:
* Regulations.gov: http://www.regulations.gov. Submit comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by searching for "FAR Case 2012-016." Select the link "Submit a Comment" that corresponds with "FAR Case 2012-016." Follow the instructions provided at the "Submit a Comment" screen. Please include your name, company name (if any), and "FAR Case 2012-016" on your attached document.
* Fax: 202-501-4067.
* Mail:
Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite FAR Case 2012-016, in all correspondence related to this case. All comments received will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal and/or business confidential information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DoD, GSA, and
II. Discussion and Analysis
The Defense Base Act of 1941, codified at 42 U.S.C.
Therefore, this action proposes to revise FAR clause 52.228-3,
This rule reflects statutory and DOL requirements, and does not impose additional burdens beyond those requirements.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not subject to review under Section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD, GSA, and
However, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) has been prepared consistent with 5 U.S.C. 603, and is summarized as follows:
This rule amends the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to clarify contractor and subcontractor responsibilities to obtain workers' compensation insurance or to qualify as a self-insurer, and other requirements, under the terms of the
The objective of the rule is to amend FAR clause 52.228-3,
DoD,
The proposed rule imposes no reporting, recordkeeping, or other information collection requirements than what are already required to be reported to the
The Regulatory Secretariat has submitted a copy of the IRFA to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
DoD, GSA, and
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The proposed rule does not contain any new information collection requirements that require the approval of the
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 52
Government procurement.
Dated:
Director,
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and
PART 52--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 51 U.S.C. 20113.
2. Revise section 52.228-3 to read as follows:
52.228-3
As prescribed in 28.309(a), insert the following clause:
(a) The Contractor shall--
(1) Before commencing performance under this contract, establish provisions to provide for the payment of disability compensation and medical benefits to covered employees and death benefits to their eligible survivors, by purchasing workers' compensation insurance or qualifying as a self-insurer under the
--This is a summary of a
Proposed rule.
CFR Part: "48 CFR Part 52"
RIN Number: "RIN 9000-AM50"
Citation: "78 FR 17176"
Document Number: "FAR Case 2012-016; Docket 2012-0016; Sequence 1"
Federal Register Page Number: "17176"
"Proposed Rules"
| Copyright: | (c) 2013 Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. |
| Wordcount: | 1405 |



Federal Acquisition Regulation; Defense Base Act
Advisor News
- Women say their advisors respect them, but talk down to them
- How PEPs compare with traditional 401(k)s
- Allianz studies why 42% of Americans retire sooner than expected
- Why advisors should be talking about life settlements
- Millennials are ready to bring their advisor to the family table
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- NAIC regulators continue pushing for annuity illustration updates
- Wink: Flat first-quarter annuity sales fall just short of $100B
- 26North Re Agrees to Acquire 100% of Independent Insurance Group
- Matthew Michelini named Athene president, with an eye on annuity growth
- Lincoln Financial Announces Executive Leadership Transitions
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- After Iowa Medicaid goes private, abuse rises, wait for services soars
- PA House Finance Committee addresses healthcare access, affordability for working Pennsylvanians
- Report: 60,000 fewer Hoosiers signed up for ACA coverage
- More Hoosiers go uninsured, resulting in higher emergency department usage
- Youth mental health system in NJ hurts kids, frustrates parents, study says
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of CVS Health Corporation’s Aetna Inc. Subsidiaries
- AM Best Assigns Issue Credit Ratings to The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company’s New Surplus Notes
- Prudential announces more layoffs as insurer continues to restructure
- Pradip Patiath Joins Securian Financial Board of Directors
- Over $107 million in life insurance benefits located for Tennesseans in 2025
More Life Insurance News