What launched probe of Hertel & Brown?
The
A former employee and a current employee were among the four people whose information prompted the
The four people, unnamed in the warrants but identified as cooperating witnesses, or CWs, provided information that supported allegations that Hertel & Brown routinely overbilled Medicare, Medicaid and private insurers over 14 years, according to the warrants. One of the core claims, according to the search warrants and the indictment, is that Hertel & Brown billed the insurers for services as if they were performed by licensed physical therapists when they were actually performed by unlicensed technicians or aides. The
A driving force for the scheme, according to allegations in the warrants, was for Hertel & Brown and its founders and co-owners,
"A physical therapist's salary is significantly higher than an aide's or technician's salary," according to the affidavits of probable cause attached to the search warrants. "Thus, there is a significant profit motive for a physical therapy practice to utilize physical therapy aides or technicians to perform the work legally reserved for only physical therapists and then bill that work as if a physical therapist performed it. In doing so, a physical therapy practice illegally reaps the higher bills of a physical therapist while saving money paying an aide or technician."
The search warrants and their affidavits were unsealed in
The
The five offices searched are in the
With the seized records as part of the probe, a grand jury issued the indictment on
None of the defendants was taken into custody, and all have been ordered by summons to appear for their arraignments in federal court in Erie starting on
With 21 defendants and what the
The four cooperating witnesses
An investigation of Hertel & Brown's billing practices first started in
The
CW1 is a person who had worked for Hertel & Brown as a non-licensed employee or an aide. The
CW2 was contacted by the
CW3 was working as a licensed physical therapist at Hertel & Brown when the
CW4 was a patient at Hertel & Brown. Thoreson interviewed that person on
The undercover
Information from inside and out
Each of the four confidential informants provided information and insights that Thoreson used to support that the
CW2 acted as a kind of guide for Thoreson, as that person explained how physical therapy is supposed to be billed.
CW1, the unlicensed aide and former Hertel & Brown employee, explained to Thoreson how that person also worked at another physical therapy practice, and how that practice had a rule against unlicensed employees providing physical therapy.
CW1 told Thoreson, according to the affidavits, "that this was the opposite of the training and guidance provided by HB. While at HB, CW1 was authorized by HB to, and in fact did, provide physical therapy to patients. Despite working at HB as an unlicensed aide, CW1's physical therapy treatment of patients was billed by HB as if CW1 was a licensed physical therapist."
CW4 gave Thoreson a patient's perspective. That person explained the type of treatment the person had received at Hertel & Brown's Harborcreek office. Thoreson wrote that an examination of the bills that Hertel & Brown submitted for the patient's treatment pointed to overbilling, based on the amount of treatment CW4 said employees had performed.
"CW4," according to the affidavits, "described the Harborcreek location as very busy, pushing through patients, with an emphasis on making money through volume."
The other cooperating witness, CW3, provided the information as a person who still worked at Hertel & Brown as a licensed therapist when the
According to the affidavit: "CW3 indicated that not every HB person is treated by an unlicensed aide. However, according to CW3, it is common for unlicensed aides to be providing treatment at HB. CW3 was trained that it is acceptable for aides to engage in treatment activity. CW3 also indicated that
Minutes and money
Running throughout the affidavits is the allegation that Hertel & Brown engaged in fraud to make more money.
The affidavits state that, in 2019,
While the
The affidavits offer examples of what the
The fraud the
"When patients and health insurance providers pay for services rendered by a physical therapist, they expect a highly trained licensed professional who has undergone four years of college, plus another three years of specialized training," Thoreson wrote. "Licensed professionals are regulated in every facet of society, and for good measure."
Contact
Elgin News Digest
TN GOP can't halt Medicaid expansion
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News