Vaccinations should be both individual and societal choice
Many Americans are confused by the 44 percent of their fellow countrymen who have yet to be vaccinated. After all, COVID-19 vaccination is free and the only cost to the individual is the time it takes to obtain the shot. For most people the opportunity cost of that time is minimal, and the cost of catching COVID-19 is potentially quite high, so why would anyone pass on a shot?
There are those who maintain that the vaccine was developed too quickly and that the research on the long-term effects of the vaccine is incomplete. They believe that it is better to contract COVID-19 and gain immunity that way rather than by a vaccination. However, those that refuse the shot neglect the costs they impose on society by their actions.
Those societal costs vary with the severity of the infection but can be significant. Early in the pandemic
Even at these rates the cost of care for a COVID-19 patients are not fully covered by the patient or their insurance carrier. Much of the fixed costs of operating a hospital must be covered by income derived from a variety of services they provide. High among those services are "elective surgeries," which are "crowded out" when a hospital must increase the space and the personnel needed to treat COVID-19 patients. To make up for the loss of income hospitals increase their charges for other procedures. Insurance companies also must cover increased costs, so insurance premiums are raised to cover their increase payouts.
There are many "social costs" incurred when individuals choose to forgo vaccination and as a result become infected. Their decision increases by many times the probability that they will also infect others thereby heightening the personal and governmental cost spiral of COVID-19. And there are the also institutional social costs incurred by businesses and organizations which lose efficiency because sick employees are unable to work for long periods of time.
Finally, there are the future costs associated with the fact that so many students of all ages have missed valuable classroom time during the pandemic.
The decision not to get vaccinated carries many costs, some of which are born by the individual making the decision, but many are incurred by all of us. The argument that individual rights are tread upon by government mandates for vaccinations has some basis in truth. If there were a way for those who decide against vaccinations to suffer the full costs of their decision than it might make sense for society to excuse people to refuse the shot. Some have tried to do just so.
Americans have traditionally revered the rights of individuals to make their own decisions. However, when society suffers physically and financially from the decisions of a few at the expense of many then there is a role for institutions and government to make decisions that benefit all. Such seems to be the case with the requirement that individuals get vaccinated.
MacDowell is president emeritus of


AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Hiscox Ltd and Its Subsidiaries
Bettencourt & Nicolopoulos: New Hampshire's individual market strong as open enrollment approaches
Advisor News
- How life insurance can provide liquidity for wealthy families
- Retirement providers turn to digital engagement to retain assets
- Looking out for clients with diminished mental capacity
- House panel advances CLEAR Forms Act backed by IRI
- Modifying life insurance based on evolving needs
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- AM Best to Deliver Presentation at 2026 ACLI Annual Conference
- Global Atlantic Announces Launch of ForeLifetime Income, a New Fixed Index Annuity
- A-Cap strikes back with lawsuit accusing SC regulators of sloppy process, leaking secrets
- AM Best to Discuss Its Views on Private Credit Surge and Risks at 2026 NAIC/NIPR Insurance Summit
- OID recovers $260M in life insurance benefits
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News