U.S. Attorney's Office reiterates defendants' cooperation in Hertel & Brown fraud case
Of the 21 defendants indicted in the case, some are cooperating with the government, with more cooperation anticipated.
"It is highly unlikely that all 21 defendants will proceed to trial," Assistant
Trabold, the lead federal prosecutor in Erie, filed the document eight days after he said at a court hearing that a "number" of defendants in the case were cooperating, signaling that possible plea deals are on the way.
He filed Friday's document to supplement the points he made at the hearing, at which three of the 21 defendants argued that they should stand trial separately rather than with all the other defendants.
As he did at the hearing, on
In court: Erie federal prosecutor: 'Number' of defendants cooperating in Hertel & Brown fraud case
"The defense will have an opportunity to cross-examine any cooperating codefendants who testify, thereby giving each defendant proceeding to trial a full and fair opportunity to confront them," Trabold said in the written supplement.
Though cooperating defendants are likely to be part of the government's case, Trabold in the supplement said he also will rely on billing records and other documents, such as emails.
"The medical documentation, and other records such as incriminating emails, will bear the names of specific defendants and thus be easily sorted by defendant," Trabold said in the supplement. "This is not a case involving recorded conversations ... but rather a document intensive investigation easily traceable to specific defendants."
Judge to rule on severance requests
U.S. District Judge
The three are also asking that their trials occur more quickly than any joint trial, which is at least six months to a year away from starting, according to statements said in court. No trial dates have been set in the case, one of the largest prosecutions of white-collar crime in Erie, based on the number of defendants and what the government alleges is the monetary amount of the fraud.
Indictment: Update: Feds allege Erie-based Hertel & Brown physical therapy committed
All 21 defendants in the case have pleaded not guilty. They are Hertel & Brown as a corporation; the business' founders and co-owners,
A federal grand jury on
Trabold is arguing that the conspiracy count ties together all the defendants for a joint trial. Baxter at the
Defense requests: 'Stigma' of fraud charges cited as some therapists in Hertel & Brown case seek relief from judge
Government's response: Prosecution pushes back on defense requests for separate trials in Hertel & Brown fraud case
Hertel & Brown, as the business, and Hertel and Brown and the other individual defendants are accused of billing for services performed by unlicensed technicians and aides as if that work had been performed by licensed physical therapists or physical therapy assistants. The defendants are also accused of overbilling in other areas.
Of the other 18 individual defendants, 17 are either licensed physical therapists or licensed physical therapy assistants, according to the indictment. A billing specialist at Hertel & Brown was also indicted.
Hertel & Brown remains in business at what had been its main location, in the
Business ramifications: Court filing: Hertel & Brown to close another physical therapy office as fraud case proceeds
It closed three of its satellite offices — in
'Unemployable in his profession'
Of the three defendants who are seeking separate trials, only Dudenhoefer filed a written supplement in support of his lawyer's arguments in court on
Records unsealed: What launched federal probe of Hertel & Brown physical therapy? Unsealed records offer details
More records unsealed:
Dudenhoefer had worked at Hertel & Brown's
"
Lengthy case: How long would a trial last in Hertel & Brown case? Timeline outlined as defendants arraigned
In response, Trabold in his supplement said Dudenhoefer's concerns about employment are not enough to warrant a separate trial. He addressed similar concerns from Johnson and Rainey, the other defendants who want separate trials.
"Any impact on Dudenhoefer's or the other two defendants' current employment prospects is irrelevant," Trabold said. "Dudenhofer's argument would result in every defendant being entitled to a severance because negative impact on employment is nearly universal for indicted defendants."
Contact
Understand Policyholders’ Claim Experiences with Medallia’s New Guidewire Marketplace App
Environmental Working Group Analysis: EWG – In the Mississippi River Region, Retiring Frequently Flooded Fields Could Save Billions in Crop Insurance Payouts
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News