Transamerica Survey Reveals Higher Education Institutions Are Evolving Toward Corporate Models for Retirement Plan Benefits
Again, this year's survey of 249 plan sponsors shows a decline of 403(b) plans offered by Higher Education institutions, and a dramatic swing in the popularity of 401(k) plans. The trend reflects the pressure on Higher Education institutions to offer the same competitive benefits as corporate businesses if they hope to compete for talent, allowing for a wider choice of retirement plan vendors.
The survey revealed that Higher Education institutions have achieved notable improvements in plan eligibility, showing that in 2016, many Higher Education institutions extended eligibility for their retirement plan to more employees, including full-time faculty and staff, part-time or adjunct faculty, and part-time staff. Part-time or adjunct faculty eligible to enroll grew to 26% in 2016, up 14 percentage points from 2014.
Higher Education institutions also made a marked increase in the adoption of automatic enrollment (67%) and automatic deferral rate increases (36%) for participants. These were significant spikes when compared to the previous two years, which stagnated at 44% for automatic enrollment, and 24% for automatic deferral rate increases, signifying participants are responding positively to plan features that automatically enroll them and increase their savings percentages.
In light of a stronger focus on fiduciary responsibilities, more than three-fourths (76%) of survey respondents said they have implemented an investment policy statement, compared to 60% in 2015. Regarding investment choices within the plan, 27% of respondents offer fewer than ten investment options, which 31% offer 11 to 15 options. Just 12% of Higher Education plans offer between 16 and 20 investment options, generally considered to be the ideal number for accommodating – but not overwhelming – participants with choice.
In a desire to overcome retirement savings inertia among their participants, an impressive 95% of Higher Education institutions now offer an employer contribution of some sort to employees. The percentage offering a fixed contribution is up five percentage points from 2015 to 71%. The percentage offering a discretionary contribution is down four percentage points to 24%.
Employee contribution levels, however, are on the wane. The percentage of participants contributing
The number of Higher Education institutions enlisting the services of retirement plan advisors and consultants jumped dramatically in 2016, moving to 41% of plans compared to just 17% in 2015. Another 24% of institutions say they plan to hire an advisor within the next 12 months. Survey responses suggest institutions of Higher Education are increasingly relying on plan advisors as project consultants. The most common role for advisors when working with retirement plans at Higher Education institutions is to meet with employees to provide retirement plan education. For Higher Education institutions that use an advisor, more than half (51%) rely on their advisor for this function.
Based upon the advice of consultants and advisors, many institutions have begun to see the benefit of outsourcing certain administrative functions related to their retirement plan. Currently, between 40% and 50% of institutions outsource services such as required minimum distributions, beneficiary designations, loan approvals, loan default monitoring, rollover verification, participant fee disclosures, and calculation of the employer match.
Because they face increased competition for top talent, Higher Education plan sponsors, more than employers of other sectors, strive to enhance their retirement plans. Over the past 24 months, many have added investment options, added or enhanced employee education, cut back on the number of retirement plan providers, and changed advisors. Many institutions are considering such changes in the next 12 months.
In 2015, 39% of Higher Education institutions reported that a participant educator from their plan visited with participants on campus. In 2016, that number more than doubled to 80%, indicating a stronger commitment to provide education to participants.
Retirement readiness has become the plan sponsor's measure of choice over the past few years, and Higher Education institutions have taken note. In 2016, 55% of Higher Education institutions said they monitor retirement readiness, a 12% improvement over the 43% saying so in 2015.
"2016 represented another year of significant change for the Higher Education retirement plan market. Higher Education institutions are rapidly evolving their approach to retirement plans as part of a strategy to offer competitive compensation and benefits," said
The entire survey is available for download from
About The 2017 Retirement Plan Trends for Institutions of Higher Education
This report presents results of a survey of 249 plan sponsors at institutions of Higher Education conducted in
About
With a history that dates back more than 100 years,
Media inquiries
Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
View original content with multimedia:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/transamerica-survey-reveals-higher-education-institutions-are-evolving-toward-corporate-models-for-retirement-plan-benefits-300553347.html
SOURCE
The Bachmann-Zeitlin Insurance Agency Announces Life Insurance Is Available
Hubbell: Iowa voters looking for governor who can get things done ‘I’m just a vehicle to make the state a better place’
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News