Solvency and Financial Condition Report 2023
St. James's Place Group Solvency and Financial Condition Report 2023
Contents
Introduction |
01 |
C) Risk Profile |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary |
02 |
C.1 |
Underwriting risk |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statement of |
C.2 |
Market risk |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Directors' Responsibilities |
05 |
C.3 |
Credit risk |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Auditors' Report and Opinion |
06 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C.4 |
Liquidity risk |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A) Business and Performance |
10 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C.5 |
Operational risk |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A.1 |
Business |
10 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C.6 |
Other material risks |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A.2 |
Underwriting performance |
11 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C.7 |
Any other information |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A.3 |
Investment performance |
11 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
D) Valuation for Solvency Purposes |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A.4 |
Performance of |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
D.1 |
Assets |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
other activities |
11 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
D.2 |
Technical provisions |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
B) System of Governance |
12 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
D.3 |
Other liabilities |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
B.1 |
General information on |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
D.4 |
Alternative methods |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
the system of governance |
12 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
of valuation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
B.2 |
Fit and proper requirements |
13 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
D.5 |
Any other information |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
B.3 |
Risk management system |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
including the ORSA |
14 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
B.4 |
Internal control system |
15 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
B.5 |
Internal audit function |
16 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
B.6 |
Actuarial function |
16 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
B.7 |
Outsourcing |
17 |
19 |
E) Capital Management |
33 |
||||||
20 |
E.1 |
Own Funds |
33 |
|||||
21 |
E.2 |
|
||||||
22 |
Requirement & Minimum |
|||||||
Capital Requirement |
35 |
|||||||
22 |
||||||||
E.3 |
Use of duration based |
|||||||
23 |
||||||||
equity risk sub-module |
||||||||
23 |
in the calculation of SCR |
37 |
||||||
23 |
E.4 |
Difference between |
||||||
24 |
Standard Formula and |
37 |
||||||
24 |
any internal model used |
|||||||
E.5 |
Non-compliance with the |
|||||||
27 |
||||||||
MCR and non-compliance |
||||||||
31 |
||||||||
with the SCR |
37 |
|||||||
32 |
Appendix: |
|||||||
Quantitative Reporting Templates |
38 |
|||||||
32 |
Glossary of Terms |
66 |
|
Solvency and Financial Condition Report 2023 |
01
Introduction
This Solvency and Financial Condition Report (SFCR) has been prepared in line with the requirements of the Solvency
- (SII) Regulations, to assist clients of the St. James's
Place Group (the Group) and other stakeholders in understanding the nature of our business, how it is managed, and its solvency position.
This is a single SFCR that incorporates consolidated information at the level of the Group, and solo information for the subsidiary insurance undertakings located within the
Following the
- the
UK enactment of the legislation (unless otherwise indicated) for the Group and for SJPUK; and - the EU enactment of the legislation for SJPI.
Relevant information about the business of our Group is provided in the Group's Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended
There are, however, certain specific SFCR requirements which are not already reported publicly elsewhere, and those are specifically included in this report. In particular this report includes full reporting of the SII valuation undertaken at
02
Summary
The Group provides insurance-based investment and pension products, mainly to
a subsidiary of SJPUK based in
Our Business
Our financial business model remains straightforward and unchanged. We attract and then retain funds under management on which we will receive an annual management fee. We use this income to meet our overheads and to invest for the future.
The demand for trusted, face-to-face financial advice remains as strong as ever, but client capacity and confidence to commit to long-term investment has been impacted in 2023 by an environment characterised by higher interest rates, stubbornly high inflation and short-term alternatives in the form of cash.
Despite the challenging operating environment, we continue to generate significant levels of net inflows, once again demonstrating the ongoing resilience of our business model. With our advisers attracting £15.4 billion (2022: £17.0 billion) of new client investments and retention excluding regular income withdrawals and maturities remaining strong at 95.3% (2022: 96.5%), net inflows totalled £5.1 billion (2022: £9.8 billion). Combined with the positive impact of investment performance, this resulted in funds under management closing the year at a record £168.2 billion (2022: £148.4 billion).
During the year, we announced the outcome of an internal review which will see us simplify our charging structure from the second half of 2025, addressing the evolution over time of an external environment that is increasingly seeking simple comparability of all advice, investment management and other services on a component-by-component basis. As a result of this disaggregation of charges, the proportion of Group profit that will arise within our life companies will reduce, in favour of increased profit emergence in our other regulated companies. Reflecting the different regulatory treatment of these businesses, the effect of this change is to reduce the value of in-force, risk margin and the Solvency Capital Requirements associated with our life companies at
The unit-linked business model means that the financial positions of SJPUK and SJPI have remained resilient throughout the year.
Insurance FUM in the Group and individual entities grew over the year as follows:
|
SJPUK1 |
SJPI |
|||||||
£'Billion |
2023 |
2022 |
2023 |
2022 |
2023 |
2022 |
|||
Opening Insurance FUM |
107.16 |
110.78 |
97.08 |
100.22 |
10.08 |
10.56 |
|||
Gross inflows |
11.86 |
12.21 |
10.97 |
11.24 |
0.89 |
0.97 |
|||
Outflows |
(6.82) |
(5.00) |
(6.18) |
(4.56) |
(0.64) |
(0.44) |
|||
Investment return |
11.11 |
(10.83) |
10.13 |
(9.82) |
0.98 |
(1.01) |
|||
Closing Insurance FUM |
123.31 |
107.16 |
112.00 |
97.08 |
11.31 |
10.08 |
1 Figures for SJPUK include closing funds under management of £0.28 billion (2022: £0.23 billion) in a subsidiary life insurance company based in
Most of the Group's insurance business is investment-related. However, both SJPUK and SJPI have small legacy books of protection business.
The Group has an additional £44.89 billion (2022: £41.22 billion) of funds under management within its unit trust and discretionary fund management companies.
More information about our business can be found in Section A of this report.
|
Solvency and Financial Condition Report 2023 |
03
Summary continued
Risk Management
The Group Board and the Boards of the insurance entities have responsibility for assessing the main risks affecting the business, and these are monitored on a regular basis.
The complex and rapidly evolving macroeconomic environment continued in 2023, which was exacerbated by political turmoil. We continue to expect to see challenges at a national level in the
Although these risks remain outside of our control, we remain focussed on understanding the degree to which the various outcomes might impact the business to allow us to consider how they might be mitigated. Stress and scenario testing has been performed which demonstrates that the businesses remain resilient, and we continually monitor the changing environment to ensure our analysis and scenario testing remains appropriate.
The key risks that could impact on the profitability of the Group's insurance businesses are:
- Market risk: A reduction in funds under management owing to market shocks, poor market performance or currency and exchange rate movements would reduce future annual management charges, and hence future profits.
- Lapse risk: Similarly, a reduction in funds under management owing to higher withdrawal rates would reduce future annual management charges. This may arise from factors such as changes in the economic climate, poor investment performance, competitor activity, or reputational damage to the Group.
- Expense risk: Higher expenses would reduce future profits.
- Operational risk: Operational risk events, such as a product failure, failure of a third-party administrator or a significant cyber-attack could result in one-off losses as well as wider reputational damage which could impact on client retention.
Although these risks may impact on the future profitability of the Group, they do not have a significant impact on our ability to meet contractual payments to clients. Our investment business is managed on a 'unit-linked' basis, where we hold assets which match our liabilities to clients, ensuring that we are always able to meet clients' withdrawal requests in line with their products' terms and conditions.
The low-risk nature of our business also means that our solvency ratio remains resilient to changes in our business and external markets.
More information about the risks that the business faces, and how we manage them, can be found in Section C of this report.
Our Solvency Position and Capital Management
We continue to manage our balance sheet prudently to ensure the Group's solvency, and that of its subsidiary entities, is maintained safely through the business cycle. We hold assets which match our liabilities to clients, and the remaining assets in the insurance companies are invested in high quality, liquid assets - typically AAA rated money market funds.
Each subsidiary company holds capital which is sufficient to cover any regulatory requirements, together with an additional margin which can absorb adverse future changes.
The Group's solvency position assessed on the
|
SJPUK |
SJPI |
|||||||
Solvency (£'Million) |
2023 |
2022 |
2023 |
2022 |
2023 |
2022 |
|||
Solvency II Own Funds (A)1 |
3,299.7 |
5,443.9 |
2,596.0 |
4,457.8 |
277.8 |
343.9 |
|||
Solvency Capital Requirement (B) |
1,727.7 |
3,522.5 |
1,450.2 |
3,212.7 |
162.2 |
192.6 |
|||
Solvency II Free Assets (A-B) |
1,572.0 |
1,921.4 |
1,145.8 |
1,245.1 |
115.6 |
151.3 |
|||
Solvency ratio (A/B) |
191% |
155% |
179% |
139% |
171% |
179% |
|||
Foreseeable dividend (C) |
43.9 |
202.4 |
260 |
315.0 |
- |
45.0 |
|||
Post-dividend solvency ratio (A-C)/B |
188% |
149% |
161% |
129% |
171% |
155% |
1 Before payment of final dividends, as presented in the Group Report & Accounts.
04
Summary continued
Our Solvency Position and Capital
Management continued
The Group and its insurance subsidiaries remain resilient and have maintained Solvency II Own Funds in excess of their Solvency II Capital Requirement throughout the year.
The Group's business model is focussed on wealth management, and the overwhelming majority of its insurance business is unit-linked investment and pensions business. However, both SJPUK and SJPI have small legacy books of protection business.
In 2021 SJPUK entered into a reinsurance arrangement with
a proportion of the FUM. This arrangement has continued in 2023.
More information about our approach to the solvency valuation and capital management can be found in Sections D and E of this report.
Our Systems of Governance
The Group Board is collectively responsible for the long-term success of our business, and a number of
key governance, strategy, planning and risk management processes operate at a Group level. However, key matters must also be considered directly by the relevant entity Board(s).
The
During the year, there have been significant changes to the Group Board, with
More information about our system of governance and changes to the regulated subsidiary entity boards can be found in Section B of this report.
|
Solvency and Financial Condition Report 2023 |
05
Statement of Directors' Responsibilities
The Directors are responsible for preparing the SFCR in accordance with the
The PRA Rulebook for SII firms in Rule 6.1(2) and Rule 6.2(1) of the Reporting Part requires that the Group must have in place a written policy ensuring the ongoing appropriateness of any information disclosed and that the Group must ensure that its SFCR is subject to approval by the Directors.
Each of the Directors, whose names and functions are listed in the Board of Directors section of the Report & Accounts, are satisfied that:
- throughout the financial year in question, the Group and its solo insurance undertakings have complied in all material respects with the requirements of the PRA rules and SII Regulations as applicable; and
- it is reasonable to believe that, at the date of the publication of the SFCR, the Group and its solo insurance undertakings continue to comply, and will continue to comply in future.
By Order of the Board
06
Auditors' Report and Opinion
Report of the external independent auditors to the Directors of
- of the External Audit Part of the PRA Rulebook applicable to Solvency II firms
Report on the Audit of the relevant elements of the Single Group-Wide Solvency and Financial Condition Report
Opinion
Except as stated below, we have audited the following documents prepared by the Company as at
- The 'Valuation for solvency purposes' and 'Capital Management' sections of the Single Group-Wide Solvency and Financial Condition Report of the Company as at
31 December 2023 , ('the Narrative Disclosures subject to audit'); and - Group templates S.02.01.02, S.23.01.22, S.
25.01.22 and S.32.01.22 ('the Group Templates subject to audit'). - Company templates S.02.01.02, S.12.01.02, S.23.01.01, S.
25.01.21 and S.28.01.01 in respect ofSt. James's Place UK plc and St. James'sPlace International plc
('the Company Templates subject to audit')
The Narrative Disclosures subject to audit, the Group Templates subject to audit and the Company Templates subject to audit are collectively referred to as the
'relevant elements of the Single Group-Wide Solvency and Financial Condition Report'.
We are not required to audit, nor have we audited, and as a consequence do not express an opinion on the Other Information which comprises:
- The 'Summary', 'Business and performance', 'System of governance' and 'Risk profile' elements of the Single Group-Wide Solvency and Financial Condition Report;
- Group template S.
05.01.02 and Company templates S.05.01.02 and S.05.02.01; - The written acknowledgement by management of their responsibilities, including for the preparation of the Single Group-Wide Solvency and Financial Condition Report ('the Responsibility Statement');
- Information which pertains to an undertaking that is not a Solvency II undertaking and has been prepared in accordance with PRA rules other than those implementing the Solvency II Directive or in accordance with an EU instrument other than the Solvency II regulations ('the sectoral information') as identified
in the Appendix to this report.
To the extent the information subject to audit in the relevant elements of the Single Group-Wide Solvency and Financial Condition Report includes amounts that are totals, subtotals or calculations derived from the Other Information, we have relied without verification on the Other Information.
In our opinion, the information subject to audit in the relevant elements of the Single Group-Wide Solvency and Financial Condition Report of the Company as at
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (
Conclusions relating to going concern
Our evaluation of the Directors' assessment of the Company's ability to continue to adopt the going concebasis of accounting included:
- Obtaining the Directors' going conceassessment for the Group and Company and gaining an understanding of the Directors' going conceassessment process, including the preparation of the budget.
- Obtaining the budget covering the period of the going conceassessment and evaluating the forecasting method adopted by the Directors in assessing going concern.
- Testing the mathematical accuracy of the model and evaluating the key assumptions using our understanding of the Group and external evidence where appropriate. We also performed a comparison of the 2023 budget and the actual results to assess the historical accuracy of the budgeting process.
- Evaluating the results of management's analysis of the relevant solvency requirements and liquidity position of the Group, including forward looking plausible downside scenarios within the Group's Own Risk and Solvency Assessment.
- Evaluating the reasonableness of management's downside assumptions using our understanding of the Group and the external environment. We evaluated management's assumptions by performing independent
|
Solvency and Financial Condition Report 2023 |
07
Auditors' Report and Opinion continued
stress testing to determine whether a reasonable alternative stressed scenario would result in a breach of minimum regulatory requirements or the Group's liquidity requirements.
- Evaluating the mitigating actions that management identified and assessing whether these were in the control of management and possible in the going conceperiod of assessment.
- Evaluating information obtained through review of regulatory correspondence, minutes of meetings of the Board, Group Audit and Group Risk Committees, as well as publicly available information to identify any information that would contradict management's assessment.
Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the Company's ability to continue as a going concefor a period of at least twelve months from the date on which the Single Group-Wide Solvency and Financial Condition Report is authorised for issue.
In auditing the Single Group-Wide Solvency and Financial Condition Report, we have concluded that the Directors' use of the going concebasis of accounting in the preparation of the Single Group-Wide Solvency and Financial Condition Report is appropriate.
However, because not all future events or conditions can be predicted, this conclusion is not a guarantee as to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the Directors with respect to going conceare described in the relevant sections of this report.
In connection with our audit of the Single Group-Wide Solvency and Financial Condition Report, our responsibility is to read the Other Information and, in doing so, consider whether the Other Information is materially inconsistent with the relevant elements of the Single Group-Wide Solvency and Financial Condition Report, or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies
or apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine whether there is a material misstatement in the relevant elements of the Single Group-Wide Solvency and Financial Condition Report or a material misstatement of the Other Information. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this Other Information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Responsibilities of Directors for the
The Directors are responsible for the preparation of the Single Group-Wide Solvency and Financial Condition Report in accordance with the financial reporting provisions of the PRA rules and Solvency II regulations. which have been modified by the modifications, and supplemented by the approvals and determinations made by the PRA under section 138A of FSMA, as detailed below:
- Permission to publish a Single Group-Wide Solvency and Financial Condition Report
The Directors are also responsible for such internal control as they determine is necessary to enable the preparation of a Single Group-Wide Solvency and Financial Condition Report that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Emphasis of Matter - Basis of Accounting
We draw attention to the 'Valuation for solvency purposes' of the Single Group-Wide Solvency and Financial Condition Report, which describe the basis of accounting. The Single Group-Wide Solvency and Financial Condition Report is prepared in compliance with the financial reporting provisions of the PRA Rules and Solvency II regulations, and therefore in accordance with a special purpose financial reporting framework. The Single Group-Wide Solvency and Financial Condition Report is required to be published, and intended users include but are not limited to the
Other Information
The Directors are responsible for the Other Information.
Our opinion on the relevant elements of the
Auditors' Responsibilities for the Audit of the relevant elements of the Single Group-Wide Solvency and Financial Condition Report
It is our responsibility to form an independent opinion as to whether the information subject to audit in the relevant elements of the Single Group-Wide Solvency and Financial Condition Report is prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the financial reporting provisions of the PRA Rules and Solvency II regulations on which they are based.
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the relevant elements of the Single Group-Wide Solvency and Financial Condition Report are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditors' report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but it is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (
08
Auditors' Report and Opinion continued
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non- compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud,
is detailed below.
Explanation as to what extent the audit was considered capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud:
Based on our understanding of the Company/industry, we identified that the principal risks of non-compliance with laws and regulations related to breaches of
- Discussions with the Risk and Compliance function, Internal Audit and the company's legal counsel, including consideration of known or suspected instances of non-compliance with laws and regulation and fraud;
- Reading the Group Audit Committee papers in which whistle blowing matters are reported and considered the impact of these matters on the group's compliance with laws and regulations;
- Reading key correspondence with the
Prudential Regulation Authority , theFinancial Conduct Authority and theCentral Bank of Ireland in relation to compliance with laws and regulations; - Reviewing relevant meeting minutes including those of the Board, Risk and Group Audit Committees;
- Reviewing data regarding customer complaints and the company's register of litigation and claims, in so far as they related to non-compliance with laws and regulations and fraud;
- Identifying and testing journal entries, in particular any journal entries posted with unusual account combinations increasing reported revenues; and
- Designing audit procedures to incorporate unpredictability around the nature, timing or extent of our testing.
There are inherent limitations in the audit procedures described above. We are less likely to become aware of instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations that are not closely related to events and transactions reflected in the Single Group-Wide Solvency and Financial Condition Report. Also, the risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery or intentional misrepresentations, or through collusion.
A further description of our responsibilities for the audit is located on the
Use of this report
This report, including the opinion, has been prepared for the Board of Directors of the Company in accordance with External Audit rule 2.1 of the Solvency II firms Sector of the PRA Rulebook and for no other purpose. We do not, in providing this report, accept or assume responsibility for any other purpose or to any other party save where expressly agreed by our prior consent in writing.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
Sectoral Information
In our opinion, in accordance with Rule 4.2 of the External Audit Part of the PRA Rulebook, the sectoral information has been properly compiled in accordance with the PRA rules and EU instruments relating to that undertaking from information provided by members of the group and the relevant insurance group undertaking.
Other Information
In accordance with Rule 4.1 (3) of the External Audit Part of the PRA Rulebook for Solvency II firms we are also required to consider whether the Other Information is materially inconsistent with our knowledge obtained in the audit of the Company's statutory financial statements. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
The engagement partner on the audit resulting in this independent auditors' report is
Chartered Accountants
|
Solvency and Financial Condition Report 2023 |
Attachments
Disclaimer
St James's
Layin' It on the Line: Life insurance in retirement — Wait, I still need that?
American Land Title Association: New Indiana Law Will Protect Homebuyers From Predatory Contracts
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News