Senate Tax Plan Would Cost $1T Over 10 Years, Factoring In Growth
The Senate GOP's tax-cut plan would result in modest economic growth in the coming decade that would shave about $400 billion off its $1.4 trillion price tag, according to a report from congressional scorekeepers released Thursday.
The proposal would boost economic growth by about 0.8 percent on average over 10 years, but the positive budgetary effects would be partially offset by higher interest payments on the federal debt, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT).
Factoring in broader economic effects, the plan would cost slightly more than $1 trillion over 10 years, the report said.
That's within the $1.5 trillion limit set by budget rules lawmakers are working under, but falls short of estimates from some conservatives that economic growth would more than offset the initial cost of the bill in the long run.
The projected increase in growth would come from increases in labor supply and investment, though the labor supply boost is expected to decline, and possibly reverse, after 2025 when individual income tax cuts are slated to expire, JCT said.
Sen. Ron Wyden, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, said the score blows a hole in Republican arguments that growth would more than make up for the package's initial price tag.
"The score ends the fantasy about magical growth, about unicorns and growth fairies suddenly showing that tax cuts pay for themselves," said Mr. Wyden, Oregon Democrat.
But Sen. John Thune of South Dakota, the No. 3-ranking Republican in the Senate, said the scorekeepers are also assuming an average growth rate of 1.9 percent over the next decade, which he said would be pessimistic.
"I think the good news in all this is what it demonstrates is what we're trying to do here actually generates economic growth — it actually generates additional revenue for the federal treasury," Mr. Thune said.
"We can argue about how much — we happen to think that the assumptions used by the joint committee are not accurate," he said.
Republicans, who are debating their bill Thursday, are weighing whether to include a "trigger" mechanism that would boost taxes and/or cut spending if their tax-cut package doesn't generate the kind of revenue levels they're projecting.


Changing Health Care Landscape Poses Uncertainties
CVS Nears Deal For Aetna
Advisor News
- After the midterms: Addressing your clients’ tax concerns
- Berkeley arts tax heads toward passage while public bank measure looks likely to fail
- Americans’ sense of overall prosperity still ticks upward
- Turning expanded eligibility into a better coverage plan for federal clients
- Election 2026: Which of Berkeley's 7 ballot measures will pass?
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Knighthead Annuity & Life Assurance Company and Merit Life Insurance Co.
- Jackson reports record annuity sales, increases share repurchase authorization
- Why the market doesn’t need more carriers
- Equitable, Corebridge steam toward merger with strong Q3 annuity sales
- Jackson Announces New Annuity Offering for AARP Members
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Open enrollment is now for 2027 health insurance coverage in Illinois: What to know
- Idaho insurance director details $13M school trust collapse
- Insurance program's collapse detailed at ISBA conference
- Boeing retirees ‘shocked’ by 400% jump in health insurance premiums
- MEDICAID PAYMENT TRANSPARENCY RULES: STATE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND LIMITATIONS
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Best’s Market Segment Report: Health and Property Lines of Business Drive Hong Kong’s Non-Life Insurance Growth
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Central States Indemnity Co. of Omaha and Its Subsidiary
- National Life Group Approves $23 Million Dividends for 2027
- Milliman’s proposed $15.5 million settlement puts life insurance underwriting data in focus
- Brighthouse Financial Announces Third Quarter 2026 Results
More Life Insurance News