Rep. Lauren Opal Boebert (R-CO) News Release
Today,
Background:
The new policy of the Biden regime is to use taxpayer dollars to fund:
* Puberty blockers
* Laser hair removal
* Surgical sterilization
* Eye and lid modifications
* Medically unnecessary plastic surgery
* Medically unnecessary mastectomies
* Breast implants
* Life-altering, irreversible drugs
* Face tightening
* Facial bone remodeling for facial feminization
* Mental wellness exams
Reps. Boebert, Buck, and Lamborn's letter to the Administrator for Medicare and Medicaid Services,
We write in response to your
Essential Health Benefits are defined by Section 1302(b)(1) of 42 U.S.C. 18022 and require individually purchased health insurance plans in small-group markets to cover a minimum federal standard of care. The decision to require gender-affirming care as an extension of mental health benefits is a blatant misinterpretation of the statute. There is little evidence that the treatment approved by CMS improves mental health and we should not be placing new private sector mandates on insurance companies to serve progressive priorities over science.
In the press release announcing this decision, you stated, "To truly break down barriers to care, we must expand access to the full scope of health care, including gender-affirming surgery and other treatments, for people who rely on coverage through Medicare, Medicaid & CHIP and the Marketplaces." Mandating coverage of unproven, experimental gender-affirming care for children covered under the
Furthermore, this decision infringes upon the conscience rights of small, private health insurance companies by forcing them to comply with this government mandate. The
Gender-affirming care like puberty-blockers and gender affirming surgeries are not essential healthcare. Scientific evidence makes clear that this experimental care is far more dangerous than helpful for mental health and suicide prevention, especially for children. By requiring coverage of these procedures under the guise of mental healthcare, CMS is prioritizing a radical progressive agenda over medical facts, the religious liberty of small health insurance companies, and existing federal statute. We strongly urge you to consider the consequences of this decision and urge you to withdraw the CMS approval. We appreciate your attention to this pressing matter.
Read this original document at: https://boebert.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-boebert-leads-colorado-republicans-opposing-taxpayer-dollars-going-sex


Novus Cannabis MedPlan Reports Third Quarter 2021 Results
100% of NCQA 5.0 Rated and 96% of CMS 4.5 and 5-Star Health Insurance Plans Use Member Experience Solutions from SPH Analytics
Advisor News
- What to discuss during the first retirement planning meeting
- Inflation, competing priorities and uncertainty erode retirement security
- As health premiums rise, 1 in 8 workers cut retirement savings
- CT governor’s candidates claims: What’s true, and what’s misleading
- Retaining clients by giving them a memorable experience
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- National Life Group expands annuity portfolio
- AM Best to Join Life/Annuity Insurance-Focused Panel Discussion at Capitol Forum Event
- USAA Earns No. 1 Ranking in JD Power Individual Annuity Study for the Third Consecutive Year
- How flexible annuities fit today’s retirement portfolios
- Foresters Financial appoints Tom Ross as chief distribution officer for U.S. annuity sales
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- How the law protecting Americans from surprise medical bills is driving up healthcare costs
- Medicare Plus supplement vs. Medicare Advantage (Maybe) 2026– Healthful Hints
- ‘Medically frail’ Medicaid enrollees won’t have to prove their inability to work to keep coverage
- IMPLEMENTATION OF IMMIGRANT ELIGIBILITY RESTRICTIONS FOR ACA MARKETPLACE SUBSIDIES UNDER THE 2025 RECONCILIATION LAW: ISSUES TO CONSIDER
- ACA HEALTH INSURANCE RATES RELEASED FOR 2027 OPEN ENROLLMENT
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News