Reed Calls for Senate to Overturn Trump Admin’s Bid to Weaken Protections for People With Pre-Existing Conditions
In an effort to protect people with preexisting conditions from the
Reed and
"It's called junk insurance for a reason: because it doesn't cover anything and it allows insurance companies to once again discriminate against women and people with preexisting conditions," said
"This week, the
"It is preposterous that the Trump administration claims to care about preserving pre-existing condition protections for millions of Americans while simultaneously peddling shoddy, substandard junk plans that undermine and weaken those very protections," he added.
Taking to the
"If
Pre-existing conditions protections would go away, and over 50 million Americans with pre-existing medical conditions would go back to being priced out of coverage. The Medicaid expansion that helps states cover more than 12 million Americans would also be gone.
Young adults would be kicked off their parents' insurance. Women could be charged more, as would older Americans. People would lose access to mental and behavioral health care and prescription drug costs for seniors would go up.
In
All to satisfy
We cannot afford to go back to the days when insurance companies were in control.
We cannot wait until the Trump Administration and Congressional Republicans come up with a plan. The ACA was signed into law almost ten years ago and still its opponents have no alternative. Americans with pre-existing conditions, those who are fighting illnesses, parents with children with complex medical needs, young people who need coverage while they explore new careers opportunities - these people, our constituents, our neighbors, our families, do not have the time to wait for
We should instead be spending our time working on solutions to today's problems. There are pressing issues the
Prescription drug costs continue to skyrocket. In fact, addressing prescription drug costs alone would go a long way towards bringing down health care costs overall. Yet, if the ACA goes away, this will be for naught. It won't matter if the drug companies are required to negotiate fair prices for drugs and are prevented from gauging customers. Without affordable health insurance, consumers will continue to be priced out of lifesaving drugs and treatments. Further, without the ACA, requirements that plans must cover prescription drugs would go away. Indeed, before the ACA, many plans did not cover needed prescription drugs, leaving patients to pay entirely out of pocket for lifesaving treatments and interventions that prevent more expensive conditions down the road."
The Reed-backed CRA resolution requires a simple majority to pass, meaning


Alliance for Justice Issues Statement on VanDyke Nomination for 9th Circuit
Shaheen Urges Support for Resolution Blocking Trump Admin’s Expansion of Junk Health Insurance Plans, Admonishes Partisan Lawsuit to Strike Down ACA
Advisor News
- Your client’s $3 million portfolio doesn’t tell you their insurance needs
- How life insurance can provide liquidity for wealthy families
- Retirement providers turn to digital engagement to retain assets
- Looking out for clients with diminished mental capacity
- House panel advances CLEAR Forms Act backed by IRI
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- What lower interest rates mean to annuity payouts
- AM Best downgrades A-Cap insurers amid financial and regulatory troubles
- Lawsuit claims Delaware Life hid billions in insurer-linked investments
- AM Best to Deliver Presentation at 2026 ACLI Annual Conference
- Global Atlantic Announces Launch of ForeLifetime Income, a New Fixed Index Annuity
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News