Pittsburgh judge rules against Highmark in hospitals' Medicare lawsuit
Common Pleas Senior Judge
They said the reduction, which Highmark and subsidiary
"Highmark has been unable to point to any provision with the provider agreements that would support its 2 percent reduction from the amount Highmark is obligated to pay under the provider agreements," he wrote.
Highmark spokesman
An attorney for the hospitals could not be reached. The plaintiffs include
Court filings do not indicate how much money the hospitals say they are owed. Wettick scheduled a hearing for
Under
Highmark argued in court papers that its agreements with the hospitals allowed it and Keystone to adjust what they paid to providers "in the event of a reduction in reimbursement amounts paid to Highmark and (Keystone) by the
The hospitals argued that Highmark could amend the agreements only to comply with a federal mandate or change in law and that the 2 percent budget spending cut did not meet that requirement.
___
(c)2015 The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review (Greensburg, Pa.)
Visit The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review (Greensburg, Pa.) at www.triblive.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Cullman jury returns $1M verdict in personal injury case
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News