How health insurers get a free pass to deny coverage from a 52‑year‑old law meant to protect worker pensions
While a nurse was off duty, her fetus went into distress and died.
Corcoran sued her insurer, UnitedHealthcare. Because of a little-known law called the Employee Retirement and Income Security Act of 1974, or ERISA, she was unable to recover any money from her insurer due to their wrongful denial. She would see no legal justice following this avoidable tragedy.
Facing health insurance hurdles is an all-too-common American experience. But while courtroom dramas would have many Americans believe that patients can sue to recover money damages when they face wrongful denials, for most people who have employer-sponsored insurance, that is far from the truth. Corcoran's case was decided in 1992 – and the situation is only worse today.
I'm a political scientist studying health insurance barriers and the politics of efforts to reform America's health care system. In my book, "Coverage Denied: How Insurers Drive Inequality in
ERISA magnifies those barriers by limiting patients' legal ability to hold health insurers accountable – instead giving them a free pass to keep denying coverage without facing real consequences.
Healthcare rationing by inconvenience
Health insurance hurdles, such as prior authorization and claim denials, are widespread in
Americans who have health insurance say prior authorization is the healthcare system's biggest burden, causing administrative headaches while care is kept out of reach. Claim denials hit hard too.
Between 2016 and 2023, claim denials increased from 9% to 12%. In a nationwide survey I conducted in 2024, I found that 36% of Americans experience at least one coverage denial – though usually, it's several.
The denial rate is even higher among people on employer-sponsored insurance, the type of insurance to which ERISA applies.
Denials can be appealed, but doing so demands a level of health insurance literacy and bureaucratic know-how that most people lack. My research shows that less affluent people are less likely to appeal denials in the first place, and sicker patients and those from historically marginalized groups are less likely to prevail even if they do appeal.
Such hurdles effectively create a dynamic that I call "rationing by inconvenience," with red tape impeding meaningful access to care. This drives both health and economic inequities.
When healthcare is kept out of reach, less affluent and Black and Hispanic patients are more likely to postpone care they need, often to the detriment of their health. And they may delay non-medical spending, too, due to unexpected healthcare costs.
ERISA's unintended effects
The sweeping impact of coverage barriers makes it especially important for patients to be able to take effective legal action against insurers. But ERISA strictly limits legal leverage for most people who get health insurance through their employer.
ERISA was crafted in response to widespread public concern about the mismanagement of private pensions, such as with the infamous sudden closure of Studebaker's factory in
But shortly before
Unlike with other insurance plans, patients with ERISA-governed plans can't sue an insurer for money damages – to reflect pain and suffering or lost income – when an insurer wrongly denies their care. They can only sue to get the specific treatment covered.
The law mainly affects one type of employer health insurance, called self-insured plans, in which the employer pays employees' medical claims itself rather than buying coverage through an insurer. When ERISA was enacted in 1974, no more than 6% of workers who got health insurance through an employer were covered by a self-funded plan.
Today, 67% of people insured through an employer – roughly 100 million Americans – are in these plans, making the law's defects especially salient.
Driving health inequity
ERISA's constraints on patient protections have far-reaching effects. For one thing, lawyers prefer not to take on cases that don't involve money, making it hard for patients to sue even for the limited benefits to which they would be entitled.
What's more, even if patients are able to sue an insurer, the harms they experienced from wrongful coverage denials still wouldn't be fully addressed – or in some cases, addressed at all.
For a worker suing an employer over a wrongly withheld pension, which ERISA was originally enacted to address, receiving that retained money would restore their loss. But that's not the case for a worker who sues an insurer that denies coverage for their health condition.
Imagine a patient denied coverage for cancer treatment, for example. Even if a court reverses the decision, the patient's condition may have worsened to the point where the treatment is no longer clinically indicated or as effective.
ERISA's poor design thus creates a destructive feedback loop that limits Americans' access to healthcare and promotes health and economic disparities. By disincentivizing lawsuits, ERISA makes it virtually costless for insurers to deny coverage for patients' prescribed healthcare.
A block on health reform
In many cases, individual states can pass their own laws to get around congressional gridlock relating to health policy. But ERISA explicitly overrides state laws that relate to self-insured health plans – including consumer protection laws that could potentially protect patients. In doing so, ERISA blocks states from enacting comprehensive health insurance reforms, including those promoting health insurance equity.
Lawmakers have raised this issue over the years, but
In my view, that is especially unfortunate because at the state level, there is bipartisan appetite to address ongoing health insurance barriers, such as by reforming prior authorization.
For example,
The Conversation is a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world.


Weekly Commentary: Our Semiquincentennial Gilded Age
Y Intercept Hong Kong Ltd Has $9.25 Million Stock Position in AGNC Investment Corp. $AGNC
Advisor News
- Ask the right questions to turn clients into raving fans
- The first 5 years of your career could determine the next 50
- Your client’s $3 million portfolio doesn’t tell you their insurance needs
- How life insurance can provide liquidity for wealthy families
- Retirement providers turn to digital engagement to retain assets
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- What lower interest rates mean to annuity payouts
- AM Best downgrades A-Cap insurers amid financial and regulatory troubles
- Lawsuit claims Delaware Life hid billions in insurer-linked investments
- AM Best to Deliver Presentation at 2026 ACLI Annual Conference
- Global Atlantic Announces Launch of ForeLifetime Income, a New Fixed Index Annuity
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News