Patent Issued for Systems And Methods For Vehicle Accident Detection Based On Intelligent Micro Devices (USPTO 10,510,124)
2019 DEC 26 (NewsRx) -- By a
The patent’s inventors are
This patent was filed on
From the background information supplied by the inventors, news correspondents obtained the following quote: “Automobile accidents are an all too common and unfortunate fact of life. In 2005, there were over 6,400,000 automobile accidents in
“Being involved in an automobile accident can be traumatic, with reactions ranging from poor concentration, nervousness, anxiety, irritability, to agitation, or even being in a state of shock. As a result, the scene of an accident can be confusing to all involved, including eyewitnesses. Recalling what was seen and said, by whom and in what context, can prove problematic under the best of circumstances. Witnesses’ memories fade as time passes, and the details of the accident become vague. In some cases, a witness may even begin to rationalize what they believe they may or may not have witnessed. In addition, investigation of automobile accidents is often hampered by lack of evidence, especially in the case of a hit-and-run accident involving two automobiles. Even if eyewitnesses happen to be present, their recollections may be unreliable. In other cases, there are no eyewitnesses at all, just damage to one or more vehicles, and in some cases, other property as well. All too often, there is no reliable way to identify the automobile that was the cause of the hit-and-run accident.
“One issue relating to automobile accidents is the repair of damaged vehicles. Insurance claims adjusters are typically tasked with assessing the damage to a vehicle, determining a reasonable cost to repair, providing a financial settlement for the repairs, and then certifying that the repairs were performed properly using legitimate parts. However, unscrupulous body shops have been known to use counterfeit parts to increase theft profits. In some cases, the substitution of these counterfeit parts is not immediately apparent, but their use soon leads to dissatisfaction with the repairs. While such cases may be the exception, the traffic in counterfeit body parts is not inconsequential. In 1997, the
Supplementing the background information on this patent, NewsRx reporters also obtained the inventors’ summary information for this patent: “Systems and methods for vehicle accident detection may comprise scanning a vehicle using a computer device. The vehicle may comprise a plurality of intelligent micro devices, such as machine-readable markers. The machine-readable markers may be embedded in the vehicle or affixed to the vehicle. A map of the plurality of machine-readable markers may be generated based on the scanning. A loss, transfer, or acquisition of one or more of the machine-readable markers may be determined based on the map. An accident associated with the vehicle may be determined based on the map, such as based on the determination of the loss, transfer, or acquisition of the one or more machine-readable markers. The accident may be determined based on historical data of the vehicle. The accident may be determined based on information stored on one or more of the plurality of machine-readable markers. Determining the accident may comprise determining an impact to the vehicle or damage to the vehicle.
“Systems and methods for vehicle accident detection may comprise a marker-reading device. The marker-reading device may be configured to determine a plurality of intelligent micro devices, such as machine-readable markers, on a vehicle. An indication of the plurality of machine-readable markers on the vehicle may be received, such as by a computing device, from the marker reading device. A loss, transfer, or acquisition of one or more of the machine-readable markers may be determined based on the indication of the plurality of machine-readable markers on the vehicle. An accident associated with the vehicle may be determined based on the plurality of machine-readable markers on the vehicle, such as based on the determination of the loss, transfer, or acquisition of the one or more of the machine-readable markers. The accident associated with the vehicle may be determined based on historical data of the vehicle. The accident may be determined based on information stored on one or more of the plurality of machine-readable markers. Determining the accident may comprise determining an impact to the vehicle or damage to the vehicle.
“Systems and methods for vehicle accident detection may comprise determining a plurality of intelligent micro devices, such as machine-readable markers, on a first vehicle. The machine-readable markers may be embedded in the first vehicle or adhered to the first vehicle, as an example. The machine-readable markers may store information. The information may be determined by reading the machine-readable markers. At least one of the plurality of machine-readable markers associated with a second vehicle may be determined, such as by reading the least one of the plurality of machine-readable markers. An accident associated with the first vehicle may be determined based on the least one of the plurality of machine-readable markers associated with the second vehicle. Determining the accident may comprise determining an impact to the vehicle or damage to the vehicle.”
The claims supplied by the inventors are:
“What is claimed:
“1. A system comprising: a marker-reading device configured to determine a plurality of machine-readable markers on a vehicle; and a computing device in communication with the marker-reading device, wherein the computing device is configured to: receive, from the marker-reading device, an indication of the plurality of machine-readable markers on the vehicle; and determine, based on the plurality of machine-readable markers on the vehicle and historical data associated with the vehicle, damage to the vehicle.
“2. The system of claim 1, wherein the computing device is further configured to: determine, based on the plurality of machine-readable markers, an identifier associated with the vehicle; and query, using the identifier, a database for the historical data associated with the vehicle.
“3. The system of claim 1, wherein the computing device is configured to determine the damage to the vehicle by determining that one or more of the plurality of machine-readable markers is unreadable.
“4. The system of claim 1, wherein the historical data associated with the vehicle comprises an indication of machine-readable markers on the vehicle that was previously received from the marker-reading device.
“5. The system of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of machine-readable markers is located on a component of the vehicle and comprises data identifying the component of the vehicle; and wherein the computing device is configured to determine, based on the plurality of machine-readable markers, at least one component of the vehicle.
“6. The system of claim 5, wherein the historical data associated with the vehicle comprises a record of components of the vehicle; and wherein the computing device is configured to determine the damage to the vehicle by determining, based on the determined at least one component of the vehicle and the record of components of the vehicle, that the determined at least one component of the vehicle comprises a replacement component.
“7. The system of claim 1, wherein the historical data associated with the vehicle comprises an indication of a time that one or more of the plurality of machine-readable markers was read by one or more machines.
“8. The system of claim 7, wherein the computing device is configured to determine the damage to the vehicle by determining that at least one of the plurality of machine-readable markers had not previously been read.”
For the URL and additional information on this patent, see:
(Our reports deliver fact-based news of research and discoveries from around the world.)



Healthy Indiana Plan not directly impacted by federal appeals court ruling on Obamacare
Advisor News
- What Trump Accounts reveal about time and long-term wealth
- Wellmark still worries over lowered projections of Iowa tax hike
- Wellmark still worries over lowered projections of Iowa tax hike
- Could tech be the key to closing the retirement saving gap?
- Different generations are hopeful about their future, despite varied goals
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- How to elevate annuity discussions during tax season
- Life Insurance and Annuity Providers Score High Marks from Financial Pros, but Lag on User Friendliness, JD Power Finds
- An Application for the Trademark “TACTICAL WEIGHTING” Has Been Filed by Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company: Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company
- Annexus and Americo Announce Strategic Partnership with Launch of Americo Benchmark Flex Fixed Indexed Annuity Suite
- Rethinking whether annuities are too late for older retirees
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Local lawmakers, advocates talk about BadgerCare expansion
- Wellmark still worries over lowered projections of Iowa tax hike
- Families defend disability services amid health cuts
- RANDALL LEADS 43 DEMOCRATS IN DEMANDING ANSWERS FROM OPM OVER DECISION TO ELIMINATE COVERAGE FOR MEDICALLY NECESSARY TRANS HEALTH CARE
- Trump's Medicaid work mandate could kick thousands of homeless Californians off coverageTrump's Medicaid work mandate could kick thousands of homeless Californians off coverage
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Gulf Guaranty Life Insurance Company Trademark Application for “OPTIBEN” Filed: Gulf Guaranty Life Insurance Company
- Marv Feldman, life insurance icon and 2011 JNR Award winner, passes away at 80
- Continental General Partners with Reframe Financial to Bring the Next Evolution of Reframe LifeStage to Market
- ASK THE LAWYER: Your beneficiary designations are probably wrong
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Cincinnati Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
More Life Insurance News