Patent Application Titled “Method Of Controlling For Undesired Factors In Machine Learning Models” Published Online (USPTO 20230401647): State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company - Insurance News | InsuranceNewsNet

InsuranceNewsNet — Your Industry. One Source.™

Sign in
  • Subscribe
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Home Now reading Newswires
Topics
    • Advisor News
    • Annuity Index
    • Annuity News
    • Companies
    • Earnings
    • Fiduciary
    • From the Field: Expert Insights
    • Health/Employee Benefits
    • Insurance & Financial Fraud
    • INN Magazine
    • Insiders Only
    • Life Insurance News
    • Newswires
    • Property and Casualty
    • Regulation News
    • Sponsored Articles
    • Washington Wire
    • Videos
    • ———
    • About
    • Meet our Editorial Staff
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    • Newsletters
  • Exclusives
  • NewsWires
  • Magazine
  • Newsletters
Sign in or register to be an INNsider.
  • AdvisorNews
  • Annuity News
  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Fiduciary
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Insurance & Financial Fraud
  • INN Exclusives
  • INN Magazine
  • Insurtech
  • Life Insurance News
  • Newswires
  • Property and Casualty
  • Regulation News
  • Sponsored Articles
  • Video
  • Washington Wire
  • Life Insurance
  • Annuities
  • Advisor
  • Health/Benefits
  • Property & Casualty
  • Insurtech
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Editorial Staff

Get Social

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
Newswires
Newswires RSS Get our newsletter
Order Prints
January 1, 2024 Newswires
Share
Share
Post
Email

Patent Application Titled “Method Of Controlling For Undesired Factors In Machine Learning Models” Published Online (USPTO 20230401647): State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Insurance Daily News

2024 JAN 01 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Insurance Daily News -- According to news reporting originating from Washington, D.C., by NewsRx journalists, a patent application by the inventors Bernico, Michael L. (Bloomington, IL, US); Myers, Jeffrey S. (Normal, IL, US); Sanchez, Kenneth J. (San Francisco, CA, US), filed on August 24, 2023, was made available online on December 14, 2023.

The assignee for this patent application is State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Bloomington, Illinois, United States).

Reporters obtained the following quote from the background information supplied by the inventors: “Machine learning models may be trained to analyze information for particular purposes involving identifying correlations and making predictions. During training, the models may learn to include illegitimate, non-useful, irrelevant, misleading, or otherwise undesired factors, especially if such biases are present in the training data sets. In particular, while training with structured data involves limiting the data that a model considers, training with unstructured data allows the model to consider all available data, including background information and other undesired factors. For example, a neural network trained with unstructured data including people’s appearances to make correlations and predictions about those people may consider such undesired factors as age, sex, ethnicity, and/or race in its subsequent analyses.”

In addition to obtaining background information on this patent application, NewsRx editors also obtained the inventors’ summary information for this patent application: “Embodiments of the present technology relate to machine learning models that control for consideration of one or more undesired factors which might otherwise be considered by the machine learning model when analyzing new data. For example, one embodiment of the present invention may be configured for training and using a neural network that controls for consideration of one or more undesired factors which might otherwise be considered by the neural network when analyzing new data as part of an underwriting process to determine an appropriate insurance premium.

“In a first aspect, a method of training and using a machine learning model that controls for consideration of one or more undesired factors which might otherwise be considered by the machine learning model may broadly comprise the following. The machine learning model may be trained using a training data set that contains information including the undesired factors. The undesired factors and one or more relevant interaction terms between the undesired factors may be identified. The machine learning model may then be caused to not consider the identified undesired factors when analyzing the new data to control for undesired prejudice or discrimination in machine learning models.

“In a second aspect, a computer-implemented method for training and using a machine learning model to evaluate an insurance applicant as part of an underwriting process to determine an appropriate insurance premium, wherein the machine learning model controls for consideration of one or more undesired factors which might otherwise be considered by the machine learning model, may broadly comprise the following. The machine learning model may be trained to probabilistically correlate an aspect of appearance with a personal and/or health-related characteristic by providing machine learning model with a training data set of images of individuals having known personal or health-related characteristics, including the undesired factors. The undesired factors and one or more relevant interaction terms between the undesired factors may be identified. An image of the insurance applicant may be received via a communication element. The machine learning model may analyze the image of the insurance applicant to probabilistically determine the personal and/or health-related characteristics for the insurance applicant, wherein such analysis excludes the identified undesired factors. The machine learning model may then suggest the appropriate insurance premium based at least in part on the probabilistically determined personal and/or health-related characteristic but not on the undesired factors.

“Various implementations of these aspects may include any one or more of the following additional features. Identifying the undesired factors and relevant interaction terms may include training a second machine learning model using a second training data set that contains only the undesired factors and the relevant interaction terms. Further, causing the machine learning model to not consider the identified undesired factors when analyzing the new data may include combining the machine learning model and the second machine learning model to eliminate a bias created by the undesired factors from the machine learning model’s consideration prior to employing the machine learning model to analyze the new data. Alternatively or additionally, identifying the undesired factors and relevant interaction terms may include training the machine learning model to identify the undesired factors and the one or more relevant interaction terms. Further, causing the machine learning model to not consider the identified undesired factors when analyzing the new data may include instructing the machine learning model to not consider the identified undesired factors while analyzing the new data. The machine learning model may be a neural network. The second machine learning model may be a linear model. The machine learning model may be trained to analyze the new data as part of an underwriting process to determine an appropriate insurance premium, and the new data may include images of a person applying for life insurance or health insurance or images of a piece of property for which a person is applying for property insurance. The machine learning model may be further trained to analyze the new data as part of the underwriting process to determine one or more appropriate terms of coverage.

“Advantages of these and other embodiments will become more apparent to those skilled in the art from the following description of the exemplary embodiments which have been shown and described by way of illustration. As will be realized, the present embodiments described herein may be capable of other and different embodiments, and their details are capable of modification in various respects. Accordingly, the drawings and description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature and not as restrictive.

“The Figures depict exemplary embodiments for purposes of illustration only. One skilled in the art will readily recognize from the following discussion that alternative embodiments of the systems and methods illustrated herein may be employed without departing from the principles of the invention described herein.”

The claims supplied by the inventors are:

“1.-16. (canceled)

“17. A computer-implemented method for training and using a neural network to evaluate an insurance applicant as part of an underwriting process, wherein the neural network controls for consideration of one or more undesired factors which might otherwise be considered by the neural network, the computer-implemented method comprising, via one or more processors: training a first neural network to probabilistically correlate an aspect of appearance with a health-related characteristic by providing the first neural network with a first training data set of images of individuals having known health-related characteristics, including the one or more undesired factors; training a second neural network using a second training data set that contains only the one or more undesired factors; combining the first neural network and the second neural network; receiving via a communication element an image of the insurance applicant; analyzing with the combined neural network the image of the insurance applicant to probabilistically determine the health-related characteristics for the insurance applicant, wherein such analysis excludes the identified one or more undesired factors; and suggesting with the combined neural network an appropriate insurance premium based at least in part on the probabilistically determined health-related characteristic but not on the one or more undesired factors to control for undesired prejudice or discrimination.

“18. The computer-implemented method of claim 17, wherein the second neural network is a linear model.

“19. The computer-implemented method of claim 17, wherein receiving the communication element includes receiving a still image or a video recording.

“20. The computer-implemented method of claim 17, further comprising identifying one or more relevant interaction terms between the one or more undesired factors.

“21. The computer-implemented method as set forth in claim 17, wherein excluding the identified one or more undesired factors when analyzing the image includes instructing the neural network to not consider the identified one or more undesired factors while analyzing the image.

“22. The computer-implemented method as set forth in claim 17, wherein the image of the insurance applicant is a selfie image taken with a smartphone and transmitted via a wireless communications network.

“23. A computer system configured to train and use a neural network to evaluate an insurance applicant as part of an underwriting process, wherein the neural network controls for consideration of one or more undesired factors which might otherwise be considered by the neural network, the computer system comprising one or more processors configured to: train a first neural network to probabilistically correlate an aspect of appearance with a health-related characteristic by providing the first neural network with a first training data set of images of individuals having known health-related characteristics, including the one or more undesired factors; training a second neural network using a second training data set that contains only the one or more undesired factors; combining the first neural network and the second neural network; receive via a communication element an image of the insurance applicant; analyze with the combined neural network the image of the insurance applicant to probabilistically determine the health-related characteristics for the insurance applicant, wherein such analysis excludes the identified one or more undesired factors; and suggest or recommend with the combined neural network an appropriate insurance premium based at least in part on the probabilistically determined health-related characteristic but not on the one or more undesired factors to control for undesired prejudice or discrimination.

“24. The computer system of claim 23, wherein the second neural network is a linear model.

“25. The computer system of claim 23, wherein receiving the communication element includes receiving a still image or a video recording.

“26. The computer system of claim 23, wherein the one or more processors are further configured to identify one or more relevant interaction terms between the one or more undesired factors.

“27. The computer system as set forth in claim 23, wherein excluding the identified one or more undesired factors when analyzing the image includes the one or more processors instructing the neural network to not consider the identified one or more undesired factors while analyzing the image.

“28. The computer system as set forth in claim 23, wherein the image of the insurance applicant is a selfie image taken with a smartphone and transmitted via a wireless communications network.

“29. A computer-implemented method for training and using a neural network to evaluate an insurance applicant as part of an underwriting process, wherein the neural network controls for consideration of one or more undesired factors which might otherwise be considered by the neural network, the computer-implemented method comprising, via one or more processors: training a first neural network to probabilistically correlate an aspect of appearance with a health-related characteristic by providing the first neural network with a first training data set of images of individuals having known health-related characteristics, including the one or more undesired factors; training a second neural network using a second training data set that contains only the one or more undesired factors; combining the first neural network and the second neural network; receiving via a communication element a selfie image of the insurance applicant taken with a smartphone and transmitted via a wireless communications network; analyzing with the combined neural network the selfie image of the insurance applicant to probabilistically determine the health-related characteristics for the insurance applicant, wherein such analysis excludes the identified one or more undesired factors; and suggesting with the combined neural network an appropriate insurance premium based at least in part on the probabilistically determined health-related characteristic but not on the one or more undesired factors to control for undesired prejudice or discrimination.

“30. The computer-implemented method of claim 29, wherein the second neural network is a linear model.

“31. The computer-implemented method of claim 29, further comprising identifying one or more relevant interaction terms between the one or more undesired factors.

“32. The computer-implemented method as set forth in claim 29, wherein excluding the identified one or more undesired factors when analyzing the selfie image includes instructing the neural network to not consider the identified one or more undesired factors while analyzing the selfie image.”

For more information, see this patent application: Bernico, Michael L.; Myers, Jeffrey S.; Sanchez, Kenneth J. Method Of Controlling For Undesired Factors In Machine Learning Models. U.S. Patent Application Number 20230401647, filed August 24, 2023 and posted December 14, 2023. Patent URL (for desktop use only): https://ppubs.uspto.gov/pubwebapp/external.html?q=(20230401647)&db=US-PGPUB&type=ids

(Our reports deliver fact-based news of research and discoveries from around the world.)

Older

Patent Issued for Managing access control of data pipelines configured on a cloud platform (USPTO 11843664): Humana Inc.

Newer

WellNow no longer accepting Excellus insurance

Advisor News

  • Can your advisory firm survive without you?
  • I started using AI, but what now?
  • How to support an entrepreneur client with multiple businesses
  • Could a narrower focus help grow your practice?
  • U.S. debt hits $40 trillion: how to support concerned clients
More Advisor News

Annuity News

  • Solen Software Group Acquires Cooperative Technologies, Provider of 1035 Exchange and Annuity Replacement Software
  • MassMutual Expands Lending Options With New Secured Credit Line
  • Corebridge Financial Introduces Progressive Trigger, a First-of-Its-Kind Index Annuity Strategy Designed to Turn Missed Years into Future Opportunity
  • Insurer proposes $1.1M deal to resolve CA teachers’ annuity fee lawsuit
  • IMOs get frustrated with slow carrier adoption of faster technology
More Annuity News

Health/Employee Benefits News

  • Researchers from Department of Research and Innovation Report on Findings in Managed Care (Quantifying Medicare prescription payment plan benefits under Medicare Part D): Managed Care
  • New Managed Care Study Results from Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard University Described (Supplemental Rebates From Drug Makers To State Medicaid Programs Grew Fivefold From 2017 To 2024): Managed Care
  • Nebraska SHIP offers support during Medicare open enrollment
  • Patients demand access to prescription drugs but need support
  • Oscar Health Inc. (NYSE: OSCR) Makes an Unexpected Move During Monday’s Session
More Health/Employee Benefits News

Life Insurance News

  • Solen Software Group Acquires Cooperative Technologies, Provider of 1035 Exchange and Annuity Replacement Software
  • Virginia orders Atlantic Coast Life to halt new business Nov. 1
  • AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of China Taiping Insurance (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.
  • AM Best Upgrades Credit Ratings of Fidelity Life Association, A Legal Reserve Life Insurance Company; Affirms Credit Ratings of Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc. and Its Life/Health Subsidiaries
  • 777 Partners founder pleads guilty to $500 million fraud scheme
Sponsor
More Life Insurance News

NEWS INSIDE

  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Economic News
  • INN Magazine
  • Insurtech News
  • Newswires Feed
  • Regulation News
  • Washington Wire
  • Videos

FEATURED OFFERS

Press Releases

  • Benefits Studio Launches to Fill the Missing Middle of Benefits Navigation at $49/mo
  • Lauren Sinnott Named to Ragan’s Top Women in Marketing Awards, Class of 2026 
More Press Releases > Add Your Press Release >

How to Write For InsuranceNewsNet

Find out how you can submit content for publishing on our website.
View Guidelines

Topics

  • Advisor News
  • Annuity Index
  • Annuity News
  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Fiduciary
  • From the Field: Expert Insights
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Insurance & Financial Fraud
  • INN Magazine
  • Insiders Only
  • Life Insurance News
  • Newswires
  • Property and Casualty
  • Regulation News
  • Sponsored Articles
  • Washington Wire
  • Videos
  • ———
  • About
  • Meet our Editorial Staff
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Newsletters

Top Sections

  • AdvisorNews
  • Annuity News
  • Health/Employee Benefits News
  • InsuranceNewsNet Magazine
  • Life Insurance News
  • Property and Casualty News
  • Washington Wire

Our Company

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Meet our Editorial Staff
  • Magazine Subscription
  • Write for INN

Sign up for our FREE e-Newsletter!

Get breaking news, exclusive stories, and money- making insights straight into your inbox.

select Newsletter Options
Facebook Linkedin Twitter
© 2026 InsuranceNewsNet.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • InsuranceNewsNet Magazine

Sign in with your Insider Pro Account

Not registered? Become an Insider Pro.