Ohio’s Medicaid Proposal Will Hurt Working People
A new report by the
The majority of working age Medicaid enrollees who can work, do, but often in food service, construction, retail, home health and child care jobs. These are jobs that generally don't offer health insurance. Low-wage work is often unsteady, with hours that can fluctuate dramatically from one week to the next. Many employees want and need more hours than they can get from their employers. Due to a lack of paid sick leave in low-wage work, and other similar factors, job loss is common.
The CBPP study found that many low-wage workers would fall short of the 80-hour-per-month requirement in one or more months during the year despite being employed.
* Nationally, almost half (46 percent) of low-income workers who do work would risk losing coverage for one or more months under a work requirement like
* Nationally, a quarter (25 percent) of people working 1,000 hours over the course of the year --about 80 hours per month, which would meet the work standard on average --would risk losing coverage for one or more months because they do not meet the 80 hour requirement in every month.
* Even for those who get the hours they need, proving compliance will create a barrier that will knock many Medicaid beneficiaries off coverage: submitting paystubs, timesheets, or other documents, potentially from multiple employers. Workers can lose coverage due to inadvertent paperwork mistakes -- theirs, their employer's, or the state's. Meeting reporting requirements may also involve taking time off from work to visit an eligibility office, waiting to get through to a caseworker, or using online portals that aren't readily available to people who lack computers or Internet access. This is particularly troublesome given well-recognized transportation barriers that plague low-wage work.
Loss of coverage will lead to poorer health among these workers, especially those with chronic conditions and other health challenges, and will make it harder for some people to continue working.
"Taking away health coverage will make workers less healthy and make it harder for them to work or look for work," said
In addition to putting coverage at risk for workers with volatile hours and unstable jobs, work requirement regulations will place a heavy burden on local governments that will administer the program. Ohio's county employees, their numbers thinned by years of deep state cuts, will be responsible for oversight of all the documentation, both of workers and of those trying to prove exemption. Paperwork mistakes - whether by the worker, the employer, or the state agency - will lead to coverage losses.
The cost to
"Those pushing this proposal do not understand the conditions faced by low-wage workers in today's economy," said Woodrum. "It will punish workers who are struggling to make ends meet by taking away their health care."


Donelon, Talbot, Thibaut and Smith Join Forces to Stabilize Health Insurance Market
Asian American Health Leaders Oppose Potential Denial of Immigration Status to Immigrants Using Needed Critical Services
Advisor News
- Majority of Americans concerned recent market highs are unsustainable
- GLP-1 users choose between medication and retirement saving
- Gen X and millennials seek new retirement model
- Are families ready for the costs of aging at home?
- When a client moves, their insurance plan needs to move, too
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- A client remarried: Does their annuity still fit?
- Gen X and millennials seek new retirement model
- Global Atlantic names Dan Farrelly head of IMO and IBD channels
- A rising retirement challenge: The license to spend
- What lower interest rates mean to annuity payouts
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News