Missouri lawmakers look to ban time limits on anesthesia coverage
As part of a wide-ranging health care bill approved last month, lawmakers included a provision made in response to a proposed policy change floated by
The insurer, which provides health coverage to an estimated 2 million Missourians, initially said it no longer would pay for anesthesia care if a surgical procedure went beyond a specific time limit.
The company dropped the plan after it triggered widespread outrage, with critics suggesting patients could wake up in the middle of a surgical procedure because of the time limits.
Despite the company’s decision to scuttle the proposal,
Under the legislation, “no health carrier or health benefit plan shall establish, implement, or enforce any policy, practice, or procedure that imposes a time limit for the payment of anesthesia services provided during a medical or surgical procedure.”
The provision is included in House Bill 2372, which was sponsored by Rep.
Rep.
“That caused a national uproar. They finally backed off. It was really egg on their face for even suggesting it,” Smith told colleagues in the House during final debate. “It’s time to send a message to insurance companies that people come first.”
In addition to Smith’s concerns, House Speaker
The now-scrapped billing scheme would not have applied to patients under the age of 22 or maternity-related care, according to
The company said it would drop the plan last year citing “widespread misinformation” about how the change would work.
In a statement Thursday,
“It will help improve access to care, supporting patients and healthcare providers – strengthening Missouri’s healthcare system,” Turner said in an email.
The company’s hasty retreat came amid intense scrutiny of the health insurance industry after the shooting death of UnitedHealthcare CEO
Thompson, 50, was killed as he walked in
The suspect,
© 2026 the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Visit www.stltoday.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.


Salem council shows support for single-payer health insurance program
Filing details Pima County's legal challenge to ACA changes
Advisor News
- After the midterms: Addressing your clients’ tax concerns
- Berkeley arts tax heads toward passage while public bank measure looks likely to fail
- Americans’ sense of overall prosperity still ticks upward
- Turning expanded eligibility into a better coverage plan for federal clients
- Election 2026: Which of Berkeley's 7 ballot measures will pass?
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Knighthead Annuity & Life Assurance Company and Merit Life Insurance Co.
- Jackson reports record annuity sales, increases share repurchase authorization
- Why the market doesn’t need more carriers
- Equitable, Corebridge steam toward merger with strong Q3 annuity sales
- Jackson Announces New Annuity Offering for AARP Members
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Open enrollment is now for 2027 health insurance coverage in Illinois: What to know
- Idaho insurance director details $13M school trust collapse
- Insurance program's collapse detailed at ISBA conference
- Boeing retirees ‘shocked’ by 400% jump in health insurance premiums
- MEDICAID PAYMENT TRANSPARENCY RULES: STATE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND LIMITATIONS
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Best’s Market Segment Report: Health and Property Lines of Business Drive Hong Kong’s Non-Life Insurance Growth
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Central States Indemnity Co. of Omaha and Its Subsidiary
- National Life Group Approves $23 Million Dividends for 2027
- Milliman’s proposed $15.5 million settlement puts life insurance underwriting data in focus
- Brighthouse Financial Announces Third Quarter 2026 Results
More Life Insurance News