Missouri Dems Slam ‘False Choice’ As Republicans Put Medicaid Money Elsewhere – InsuranceNewsNet

InsuranceNewsNet — Your Industry. One Source.™

Sign in
  • Subscribe
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Home Now reading Newswires
Topics
    • Life Insurance
    • Annuity News
    • Health/Employee Benefits
    • Property and Casualty
    • Advisor News
    • Washington Wire
    • Regulation News
    • Sponsored Content
    • Webinars
    • Monthly Focus
  • INN Exclusives
  • NewsWires
  • Magazine
  • Free Newsletters
Sign in or register to be an INNsider.
  • INN Exclusives
  • NewsWires
  • Magazine
  • Free Newsletters
  • Insider
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Editorial Staff
  • Contact
  • Newsletters

Get Social

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Health Insurance Newsletter
Newswires RSS Get our newsletter
Order Prints
March 29, 2021 Newswires No comments
Share
Share
Tweet
Email

Missouri Dems Slam ‘False Choice’ As Republicans Put Medicaid Money Elsewhere

Kansas City Star (MO)

JEFFERSON CITY — Missouri House Republicans want to put the $130 million intended for voter-approved Medicaid expansion into other social services, including the state's embattled public defender system, school transportation and mental health, under legislation filed late Friday.

"We're choosing to prioritize different populations," said House Budget Committee Chair Cody Smith, a Carthage Republican.

The committee voted along party lines on Thursday to exclude funding for expansion — which was approved by 53% of Missouri voters last August — from the rest of Gov. Mike Parson's proposed state budget. Democrats plan to re-introduce the funds into the budget on the House floor.

The $130 million would fund expanded eligibility for the state health care program to nearly 300,000 low-income Missourians. Under the Affordable Care Act, the federal government picks up 90% of the tab on expansion — $1.4 billion for Missouri.

On Friday, Smith filed legislation to spend almost the same amount of state money, and almost $900 million in federal funds, on other items.

They include $1 million for the short-staffed public defender system and $18 million toward public school transportation. The transportation money would clear the way for a controversial school choice program that would use tax credits to fund scholarships to private schools. Under a bill narrowly passed by the House last month, the tax credit program is tied to the state's funding of public school transportation.

Much of the money is going to fill health or senior service expansions the committee had reduced from Parson's budget at the same time they rejected Medicaid expansion funds.

Parson had opposed Medicaid expansion, but after voters approved a constitutional amendment adopting the measure he said he would move forward with implementation. In his proposed $34 billion budget, the state was prepared to fund expanded Medicaid and several mental health service expansions.

Last week, however, Smith deleted the mental health expansions, citing cost.

"I think we've got to be careful about how we expand these services," he told the committee. "In light of the fact that we potentially, you know, we also have to consider Medicaid expansion."

Democrats have rejected the Republicans' characterization that Missouri needs to make "binary choices" between services this year.

State revenue collections are higher than expected. On top of that, the state is receiving pandemic-related federal support that boosts Washington's share of existing Medicaid costs, and would get an extra $1.1 billion in the next two years from the Biden administration specifically for expanding the program.

In total, lawmakers removed $115 million in state funds from Parson's budget for expanding mental health services for adults, $28 million for youth mental health services and $23 million for addiction treatment.

Using the money intended for Medicaid expansion, Smith wants to put $28 million back into adult mental health, $765,000 into youth mental health and $10.8 million back into addiction treatment.

His proposal would use the Medicaid money to fund other services at a higher level than Parson's request.

Those include $6.7 million more in state funds for residential services for the developmentally disabled, $8.8 million more for in-home care for the elderly and a one-time $30 million boost in nursing home reimbursements.

In a statement, Smith said the bill would help "the most vulnerable Missourians," as opposed to Medicaid expansion for "able bodied adults, many who choose not to work."

Budget Committee ranking member Peter Merideth slammed the comments on Twitter, accusing Smith of creating a scarcity that does not exist.

"Even your governor knew we didn't need to make these false choices you present," Meredith, a St. Louis Democrat, wrote.

States that expand Medicaid are able to save money by shifting many state health costs onto the federal funds, studies have found.

A 2019 analysis by Washington University in St. Louis concluded that Missouri could save about $39 million on expansion. But Smith has largely rejected those studies. He said not all of the cost shifts assumed by researchers are allowed by the federal government, and that the studies don't account for future Medicaid enrollment.

Missouri's Medicaid program, known as MO HealthNet, has one of the strictest eligibility thresholds in the nation. It doesn't cover most childless adults. The expansion will allow adults earning up to 138% of the federal poverty level to be covered, and the Parson administration estimates 275,000 will become eligible.

Though the expanded eligibility, which begins July, passed as an amendment to the state constitution, Republican lawmakers contend they are not obligated to pay for it. Only the legislature — not voter-initiated ballot measures — can direct the state to spend money, they said.

Meredith has warned that thousands will become eligible to enroll in Medicaid anyway on July 1, leading to an underfunded program.

Smith said if expansion is not paid for, "I would expect the Department [of Social Services] do not provide services to that population on July 1."

He acknowledged it would likely lead to a lawsuit.

"The eligibility enshrined in the constitution does not speak to the way it's paid for," he said.

___

(c)2021 The Kansas City Star (Kansas City, Mo.)

Visit The Kansas City Star (Kansas City, Mo.) at www.kansascity.com

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Older

'What do you fall back on?': How families, business owners rebuild their lives after fire

Newer

Neptune Flood Announces Results of the 2021 Neptune Consumer Survey of Flood Awareness

Advisor News

  • Boston-area man charged in new indictment for more securities fraud
  • Lexington native convicted of fraud over $1 billion company faces new charges
  • PERSONAL FINANCE: Understanding wills and trusts in estate planning
  • How to master employee benefits
  • Ohio businessman guilty of investment scheme
More Advisor News

Annuity News

  • Brighthouse Financial adds to Shield Level annuity suite with new product
  • Prudential FlexGuard reaches $10B total sales milestone at record pace
  • Retirees can rely on annuities as a source of guaranteed income for life
  • Lottery ticket bought in Illinois wins $1.337 billion
  • Mega Millions becomes Mega Billion for Friday drawing
More Annuity News

Health/Employee Benefits News

  • Doctor loses at least four homes, sentenced to federal prison for healthcare fraud amounting to $38M
  • North Carolina woman convicted in $34 million health care fraud scheme
  • Growing number of workers enroll in high deductible health plans
  • The Schumer-Manchin deal’s ACA provision creates another budgetary ‘cliff’
  • They wanted to stop Obamacare. They may have protected abortion rights in Wyoming instead.
More Health/Employee Benefits News

Life Insurance

  • How to get the most out of Life Insurance Awareness Month
  • Life application activity down in July, MIB Index reports
  • Dentist found guilty of murdering his wife for life insurance on African safari
  • Should student loan borrowers also get life insurance?
  • NCOIL resolution: certain enhanced cash surrender value endorsements are violations
More Life Insurance

- Presented By -

How to Write For InsuranceNewsNet

Find out how you can submit content for publishing on our website.
View Guidelines

FEATURED OFFERS

Grow your life insurance business with John Hancock • It’s time to see how our cutting-edge solutions can help you and your clients get to know us.

Press ReleasesAll press releases

  • CybeReady Supports Security Defenses with CISO Toolkit
  • Life and Disability Income Insurance Products from MassMutual Now Available on iPipeline®’s End-to-End Digital Platform
  • Business on the Go with The Crump Mobile App
  • iPipeline® Provides Advisors Excel with Unified Path Toward Accessing Core Data Analytics in Financial Services
  • iPipeline® Adds Speed of Underwriting to Quote Engine with Ethos to Deliver Insurance to Agents in Minutes
Add your Press Release >

Topics

  • Life Insurance
  • Annuity News
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Property and Casualty
  • Advisor News
  • Washington Wire
  • Regulation News
  • Sponsored Content
  • Webinars
  • Monthly Focus

Top Sections

  • Life Insurance
  • Annuity News
  • Health/Employee Benefits News
  • Property and Casualty News
  • AdvisorNews
  • Washington Wire
  • Insurance Webinars

Our Company

  • About
  • Editorial Staff
  • Magazine
  • Write for INN
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Sign up for our FREE e-Newsletter!

Get breaking news, exclusive stories, and money- making insights straight into your inbox.

select Newsletter Options
Facebook Linkedin Twitter
© 2022 InsuranceNewsNet.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • AdvisorNews

Sign in with your INNsider Account

Not registered? Become an INNsider.