Michigan lawmakers approve extension of unemployment benefits, new nursing home rules
Leaders from the
More:
More: Thousands of
The process, especially finding common ground on bills that protect employers against lawsuits, was a struggle.
The measures come as
Rep.
Yet the need for any legislation is significant, underscored by recent
As of this week, more than 130,000 residents have tested positive for the disease caused by the coronavirus. Hundreds of thousands of residents have applied for unemployment assistance, with thousands of businesses also seeking financial aid.
At the end of the long day, the
One measure, SB 886, extends to 26 weeks the amount of unemployment insurance available this year due to a job loss related to COVID-19. That was the same amount of time available under the governor's executive order -- this bill also clarifies that the state can't re-examine any unemployment claim based on it being filed under an executive order now deemed invalid.
The bill also loosens the requirements a business would need to meet in order to institute a work share program, an initiative that reduces employee hours but avoids mass layoffs.
The updated measure passed unanimously in both chambers.
Another bill, SB 1094, would require state health officials to examine COVID-19 policies at nursing homes and how they have been implemented. Although a portion of the bill states no patient who tests positive for COVID-19 may be sent to a nursing home, a different portion of the legislation states a nursing home may take a patient with the virus if the home has a state-approved area within the facility for people with the disease caused by the coronavirus.
But the real fight hinged on measures that would provide a liability shield for businesses and a quirky
More: Bills OK'd by
More:
A series of House-led legislation provides legal protections for businesses against lawsuit filed related to the pandemic. Republican supporters say they wanted to provide peace of mind and assistance for businesses that do the right thing and are still sued. Opponents, including Whitmer, say the legislation goes too far in the protections offered.
While the move was not unprecedented, it was a sign legislative leaders knew the governor wanted to support the unemployment bill and opposed the liability measures.
On Monday, Whitmer told reporters she hoped House lawmakers would undo the maneuver, known as a tie-bar.
“I think it’s really important that we’ve got unemployment protections for the hundreds of thousands of Michiganders whose benefits are in the balance as a result of the Supreme Court decision," Whitmer said.
"These were benefits that I was able to extend, but with the court’s decision they now hang in the balance, and while the Legislature has to play an important role, I’m hopeful they’ll break that tie-bar so I can sign it in to law and we can fix this post-haste.”
The liability measures passed on largely partisan lines.
More:
More:
The legislative action comes in the wake of recent rulings from the
The court ruled 4-3 that the Emergency Powers of Governor Act of 1945, which Whitmer has been using as the major legal underpinning for her emergency orders is unconstitutional because it cedes powers that belong with the Legislature to the governor. The court also ruled that under the Emergency Management Act of 1976, Whitmer cannot maintain a state of emergency beyond 28 days without legislative approval. That approval expired at the end of April, and has not been renewed.
Whitmer must still sign the measures passed for them to become law.
Staff writer
Contact
This article originally appeared on
___
(c)2020 the Detroit Free Press
Visit the Detroit Free Press at www.freep.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Susan Wild, Lisa Scheller discuss Israel, antisemitism and foreign policy during latest Pa. 7th District debate
A Third Of Workers Less Motivated Than Prior To The Pandemic
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News