Newswires
MERCURY GENERAL CORP – 10-Q – Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a "safe harbor" for certain forward-looking statements. Certain statements contained in this report are forward-looking statements based on the Company's current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effects on the Company. There can be no assurance that future developments affecting the Company will be those anticipated by the Company. Actual results may differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties (some of which are beyond the control of the Company) and are subject to change based upon various factors, including but not limited to the following risks and uncertainties: changes in the demand for the Company's insurance products, inflation and general economic conditions, including general market risks associated with the Company's investment portfolio; the accuracy and adequacy of the Company's pricing methodologies; catastrophes in the markets served by the Company; uncertainties related to estimates, assumptions and projections generally; the possibility that actual loss experience may vary adversely from the actuarial estimates made to determine the Company's loss reserves in general; the Company's ability to obtain and the timing of the approval of premium rate changes for insurance policies issued in the states where it operates; legislation adverse to the automobile insurance industry or business generally that may be enacted in the states where the Company operates; the Company's success in managing its business in non-California states; the presence of competitors with greater financial resources and the impact of competitive pricing and marketing efforts; the Company's ability to successfully manage its claims organization outside ofCalifornia ; the Company's ability to successfully allocate the resources used in the states with reduced or exited operations to its operations in other states; changes in driving patterns and loss trends; acts of war and terrorist activities; pandemics, epidemics, widespread health emergencies, or outbreaks of infectious diseases; court decisions and trends in litigation and health care and auto repair costs; and legal, cybersecurity, regulatory and litigation risks. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as the result of new information, future events or otherwise. For a more detailed discussion of some of the foregoing risks and uncertainties, see the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission onFebruary 15, 2022 . OVERVIEW
A. General
The operating results of property and casualty insurance companies are subject to significant quarter-to-quarter and year-to-year fluctuations due to the effect of competition on pricing, the frequency and severity of losses, the effect of weather and natural disasters on losses, general economic conditions, the general regulatory environment in states in which an insurer operates, state regulation of insurance including premium rates, changes in fair value of investments, and other factors such as changes in tax laws. The property and casualty insurance industry has been highly cyclical, with periods of high premium rates and shortages of underwriting capacity followed by periods of severe price competition and excess capacity. These cycles can have a significant impact on the Company's ability to grow and retain business.
This section discusses some of the relevant factors that management considers in
evaluating the Company's performance, prospects, and risks. It is not
all-inclusive and is meant to be read in conjunction with the entirety of
management's discussion and analysis, the Company's consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto, and all other items contained within this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Note on COVID-19 and General Economic Conditions
InMarch 2020 , the outbreak of COVID-19 was recognized as a pandemic by theWorld Health Organization (the "WHO"), and the pandemic has had a notable impact on general economic conditions, including, but not limited to, the temporary closures of many businesses, "shelter in place" and other governmental orders, and reduced consumer spending. The Company has been following guidelines established by theCenters for Disease Control , theWHO , and the state and local governments. The Company has taken and continues to take a number of precautionary steps to safeguard its customers, business and employees from COVID-19. Most of the Company's employees have been working remotely, with only certain operationally critical employees working on site at various locations. InNovember 2021 , the Company extended its "work-from-home" policy indefinitely under the new "Mercury's My Workplace" policy, allowing most of its employees to work from anywhere in theU.S. beginningJanuary 2022 .
The Company's automobile line of insurance business began experiencing a
significant decrease in loss frequency in March of 2020, and it remained lower
than historical levels through the first half of 2021, although it began to
increase as more
24 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents drivers returned to the road following the gradual reopening of businesses inCalifornia and other states. After bottoming out in the second quarter of 2020, loss frequency has been increasing and is near pre-pandemic levels. The costs to treat bodily injuries and repair or replace vehicles may remain high due to supply chain and labor force issues exacerbated by the high overall inflation rate and theRussia -Ukraine war. Inflationary trends have accelerated to their highest level since the 1980s with the most recent consumer price index increase of 9.1%. Excessive inflation has led to significant increases in loss severities related to vehicle repairs and bodily injuries. The COVID-19 pandemic also created more uncertainty, and the total effect on losses occurring during the COVID-19 era will not be known for several years. The Company expects more late reported claims and a prolonged settlement period. Many courts have been closed, and claimants may have been reluctant to seek medical treatments due to the pandemic. The recent increases in loss frequency combined with sustained high loss severity have negatively impacted the Company's results of operations, and the Company has submitted private passenger automobile rate filings in many states requesting rate increases. In addition, the Company is taking various non-rate actions to improve profitability. InMarch 2020 , theFederal Open Market Committee ("FOMC") of theFederal Reserve unveiled a set of aggressive measures to cushion the economic impact of the global COVID-19 crisis, including, among others, cutting the federal funds rate by 100 basis points to a range of 0.00% to 0.25% and establishing a series of emergency credit facilities in an effort to support the flow of credit in the economy, easing liquidity pressure and calming market turmoil. While volatility in the financial markets remains elevated, overall market liquidity concerns have eased following the actions taken by theFOMC . However, theFOMC started raising the federal funds rate inMarch 2022 as a response to inflationary pressures. The ensuing increases in market interest rates resulted in significant decreases in the fair values of the Company's fixed maturity securities during the first half of 2022. The Company believes that it will continue to have sufficient liquidity to support its business operations without the forced sale of investments, based on its existing cash and short-term investments, future cash flows from operations, and$75 million of undrawn credit in its unsecured credit facility. The Company will continue to monitor the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the legislative relief programs for the pandemic, the rising inflation and interest rates and theRussia -Ukraine war. The extent of these effects on the Company's business and financial results will depend largely on future developments, including the duration and severity of the pandemic, the high inflation rate and the war, most of which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted.
B. Business
The Company is primarily engaged in writing personal automobile insurance
through 13 insurance subsidiaries ("Insurance Companies") in 11 states,
principally California . The Company also writes homeowners, commercial
automobile, commercial property, mechanical protection, and umbrella insurance.
The Company's insurance policies are mostly sold through independent agents who
receive a commission for selling policies. The Company believes that it has
thorough underwriting and claims handling processes that, together with its
agent relationships, provide the Company with competitive advantages.
The following tables present direct premiums written, by state and line of
insurance business, for the six months ended
Six Months Ended June 30, 2022
(Dollars in thousands)
Private Commercial
Passenger Automobile Homeowners Automobile Other Lines (2) Total
California $ 1,105,341 $ 352,724 $ 99,027 $ 105,434 $ 1,662,526 81.0 %
Texas 48,283 53,388 23,658 3,407 128,736 6.3 %
Other states (1) 181,380 56,024 18,673 4,979 261,056 12.7 %
Total $ 1,335,004 $ 462,136 $ 141,358 $ 113,820 $ 2,052,318 100.0 %
65.0 % 22.6 % 6.9 % 5.5 % 100.0 %
25
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Six Months Ended June 30, 2021
(Dollars in thousands)
Private Commercial
Passenger Automobile Homeowners Automobile Other Lines (2) Total
California $ 1,156,314 $ 306,989 $ 91,965 $ 91,687 $ 1,646,955 85.5 %
Other states (1) 156,213 71,132 43,107 8,859 279,311 14.5 %
Total $ 1,312,527 $ 378,121 $ 135,072 $ 100,546 $ 1,926,266 100.0 %
68.2 % 19.6 % 7.0 % 5.2 % 100.0 %
______________
(1) No individual state accounted for more than 5% of total direct premiums
written.
(2) No individual line of insurance business accounted for more than 5% of total
direct premiums written.
C. Regulatory and Legal Matters
The Department of Insurance ("DOI") in each state in which the Company operates is responsible for conducting periodic financial, market conduct, and rating and underwriting examinations of the Insurance Companies in their states. Market conduct examinations typically review compliance with insurance statutes and regulations with respect to rating, underwriting, claims handling, billing, and other practices.
The following table presents a summary of recent and upcoming examinations:
State Exam Type Exam Period Covered Status
CA, FL, GA, Coordinated Multi-state
IL, OK, TX Financial 2018-2021 Examination began in the second quarter of 2022.
CA Premium Tax 2018-2021 Examination began in the second quarter of 2022.
During the course of and at the conclusion of the examinations, the examining
DOI generally reports findings to the Company.
The Company is, from time to time, named as a defendant in various lawsuits or regulatory actions incidental to its insurance business. The majority of lawsuits brought against the Company relate to insurance claims that arise in the normal course of business and are reserved for through the reserving process. For a discussion of the Company's reserving methods, see the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2021 . The Company establishes reserves for non-insurance claims related lawsuits, regulatory actions, and other contingencies when the Company believes a loss is probable and is able to estimate its potential exposure. For loss contingencies believed to be reasonably possible, the Company also discloses the nature of the loss contingency and an estimate of the possible loss, range of loss, or a statement that such an estimate cannot be made. In addition, the Company accrues for anticipated legal defense costs associated with such lawsuits and regulatory actions. While actual losses may differ from the amounts recorded and the ultimate outcome of the Company's pending actions is generally not yet determinable, the Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of currently pending legal or regulatory proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or cash flows. In all cases, the Company vigorously defends itself unless a reasonable settlement appears appropriate. For a discussion of any additional regulatory or legal matters, see the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2021 , and Note 12. Contingencies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this Quarterly Report.
D. Critical Accounting Estimates
Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves ("Loss Reserves")
Preparation of the Company's consolidated financial statements requires
management's judgment and estimates. The most significant is the estimate of
loss reserves. Estimating loss reserves is a difficult process as many factors
can ultimately affect the final settlement of a claim and, therefore, the loss
reserve that is required. A key assumption in estimating loss reserves is the
degree to which the historical data used to analyze reserves will be predictive
of ultimate claim costs on incurred
26
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
claims. Changes in the regulatory and legal environments, results of litigation,
medical costs, the cost of repair materials, and labor rates, among other
factors, can impact this assumption. In addition, time can be a critical part of
reserving determinations since the longer the span between the incidence of a
loss and the payment or settlement of a claim, the more variable the ultimate
settlement amount could be. Accordingly, short-tail claims, such as property
damage claims, tend to be more reasonably predictable than long-tail liability
claims.
The Company calculates a loss reserve point estimate rather than a range. There
is inherent uncertainty with estimates and this is particularly true with loss
reserve estimates. This uncertainty comes from many factors which may include
changes in claims reporting and settlement patterns, changes in the regulatory
and legal environments, uncertainty over inflation rates, and uncertainty for
unknown items. The Company does not make specific provisions for these
uncertainties, rather it considers them in establishing its loss reserve by
reviewing historical patterns and trends and projecting these out to current
loss reserves. The underlying factors and assumptions that serve as the basis
for preparing the loss reserve estimate include paid and incurred loss
development factors, expected average costs per claim, inflation trends,
expected loss ratios, industry data, and other relevant information.
The Company also engages independent actuarial consultants to review the
Company's loss reserves and to provide the annual actuarial opinions under
statutory accounting principles as required by state regulation. The Company
analyzes loss reserves quarterly primarily using the incurred loss, paid loss,
average severity coupled with the claim count development methods, and the
generalized linear model ("GLM") described below. When deciding among methods to
use, the Company evaluates the credibility of each method based on the maturity
of the data available and the claims settlement practices for each particular
line of insurance business or coverage within a line of insurance business. The
Company may also evaluate qualitative factors such as known changes in laws or
legal rulings that could affect claims handling or other external environmental
factors or internal factors that could affect the settlement of claims. When
establishing the loss reserve, the Company will generally analyze the results
from all of the methods used rather than relying on a single method. While these
methods are designed to determine the ultimate losses on claims under the
Company's policies, there is inherent uncertainty in all actuarial models since
they use historical data to project outcomes. The Company believes that the
techniques it uses provide a reasonable basis in estimating loss reserves.
•The incurred loss method analyzes historical incurred case loss (case reserves
plus paid losses) development to estimate ultimate losses. The Company applies
development factors against current case incurred losses by accident period to
calculate ultimate expected losses. The Company believes that the incurred loss
method provides a reasonable basis for evaluating ultimate losses, particularly
in the Company's larger, more established lines of insurance business which have
a long operating history.
•The paid loss method analyzes historical payment patterns to estimate the
amount of losses yet to be paid.
•The average severity method analyzes historical loss payments and/or incurred losses divided by closed claims and/or total claims to calculate an estimated average cost per claim. From this, the expected ultimate average cost per claim can be estimated. The average severity method coupled with the claim count development method provide meaningful information regarding inflation and frequency trends that the Company believes is useful in establishing loss reserves. The claim count development method analyzes historical claim count development to estimate future incurred claim count development for current claims. The Company applies these development factors against current claim counts by accident period to calculate ultimate expected claim counts. •The GLM determines an average severity for each percentile of claims that have been closed as a percentage of estimated ultimate claims. The average severities are applied to open claims to estimate the amount of losses yet to be paid. The GLM utilizes operational time, determined as a percentile of claims closed rather than a finite calendar period, which neutralizes the effect of changes in the timing of claims handling. The Company analyzes catastrophe losses separately from non-catastrophe losses. For catastrophe losses, the Company generally determines claim counts based on claims reported and development expectations from previous catastrophes and applies an average expected loss per claim based on loss reserves established by adjusters and average losses on previous similar catastrophes. For catastrophe losses on individual properties that are expected to be total losses, the Company typically establishes reserves at the policy limits. AtJune 30, 2022 andDecember 31, 2021 , the Company recorded its point estimate of approximately$2.39 billion and$2.23 billion ($2.36 billion and$2.19 billion , net of reinsurance), respectively, in loss reserves, which included approximately$1.16 billion and$1.03 billion ($1.16 billion and$1.02 billion , net of reinsurance), respectively, of incurred but not reported loss reserves ("IBNR"). IBNR includes estimates, based upon past experience, of ultimate developed costs, which may differ from case estimates, unreported claims that occurred on or prior toJune 30, 2022 andDecember 31, 2021 , and estimated future 27
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
payments for reopened claims. Management believes that the liability for loss reserves is adequate to cover the ultimate net cost of losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred to date; however, since the provisions are necessarily based upon estimates, the ultimate liability may be more or less than such provisions. The Company evaluates its loss reserves quarterly. When management determines that the estimated ultimate claim cost requires a decrease for previously reported accident years, favorable development occurs and a reduction in losses and loss adjustment expenses is reported in the current period. If the estimated ultimate claim cost requires an increase for previously reported accident years, unfavorable development occurs and an increase in losses and loss adjustment expenses is reported in the current period.
For a further discussion of the Company's reserving methods, see the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended
Revenues
Net premiums earned and net premiums written for the three months endedJune 30, 2022 increased 6.5% and 6.2%, respectively, from the corresponding period in 2021. The increase in net premiums earned and net premiums written for the three months endedJune 30, 2022 compared to the corresponding period in 2021 was primarily due to higher average premiums per policy arising from rate increases in theCalifornia homeowners line of insurance business and increases in the number of policies written outside ofCalifornia , partially offset by a decrease in the number of private passenger automobile policies written inCalifornia . Net premiums earned included ceded premiums earned of$17.1 million and$15.6 million for the three months endedJune 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Net premiums written included ceded premiums written of$17.4 million and$15.8 million for the three months endedJune 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The increase in ceded premiums earned and ceded premiums written for the three months endedJune 30, 2022 compared to the corresponding period in 2021 resulted mostly from higher reinsurance coverage and rates and growth in the covered book of business. Net premiums earned, a GAAP measure, represents the portion of net premiums written that is recognized as revenue in the financial statements for the periods presented and earned on a pro-rata basis over the term of the policies. Net premiums written is a non-GAAP financial measure which represents the premiums charged on policies issued during a fiscal period, net of any applicable reinsurance. Net premiums written is a statutory measure designed to determine production levels. The following is a reconciliation of net premiums earned to net premiums written: Three Months Ended June 30, 2022 2021 (Amounts in thousands) Net premiums earned$ 987,512 $ 926,820
Change in net unearned premiums 29,482
30,522
Net premiums written $ 1,016,994 $ 957,342
Expenses
Loss and expense ratios are used to interpret the underwriting experience of
property and casualty insurance companies. The following table presents the
Insurance Companies' loss, expense, and combined ratios determined in accordance
with GAAP:
Three Months Ended June 30,
2022 2021
Loss ratio 83.7 % 70.9 %
Expense ratio 22.9 % 23.9 %
Combined ratio (1) 106.6 % 94.9 %
28
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
__________
(1) Combined ratio for the three months ended
rounding.
Loss ratio is calculated by dividing losses and loss adjustment expenses by net premiums earned. The loss ratio for the second quarter of 2022 and 2021 was affected by favorable development of approximately$2 million and approximately$14 million , respectively, on prior accident years' loss and loss adjustment expense reserves. The favorable development for the second quarter of 2022 was primarily attributable to lower than estimated losses and loss adjustment expenses in the commercial automobile line of insurance business, partially offset by unfavorable development in the commercial property and private passenger automobile lines of insurance business. The favorable development for the second quarter of 2021 was primarily attributable to lower than estimated losses and loss adjustment expenses in the commercial property and private passenger automobile lines of insurance business. In addition, the 2022 loss ratio was negatively impacted by approximately$19 million of catastrophe losses, excluding unfavorable development of approximately$2 million on prior years' catastrophe losses, primarily due to rainstorms and hail inTexas . The 2021 loss ratio was negatively impacted by approximately$25 million of catastrophe losses, primarily due to extreme weather events inTexas andOklahoma and winter storms inCalifornia . There was no development on prior years' catastrophe losses for the three months endedJune 30, 2021 . Excluding the effect of estimated prior periods' loss development and catastrophe losses, the loss ratio was 82.0% and 69.7% for the second quarter of 2022 and 2021, respectively. The increase in the loss ratio was primarily due to an increase in loss severity in the automobile line of insurance business, partially offset by higher average premiums per policy arising from rate increases in theCalifornia homeowners line of insurance business. Inflationary trends have accelerated to their highest level in decades, which has had a significant impact on the cost of auto parts and labor as well as medical expenses for bodily injuries, and supply chain and labor shortage issues have lengthened the time to repair vehicles. Bodily injury costs are also under pressure from social inflation.These inflationary pressures and the supply chain and labor shortage issues have led to a significant increase in automobile loss severity and increased losses and loss adjustment expenses for the insured events of the current accident year for the three months endedJune 30, 2022 compared to the corresponding period in 2021. The Company has filed for rate increases in many states and is taking various non-rate actions to improve profitability. Expense ratio is calculated by dividing the sum of policy acquisition costs and other operating expenses by net premiums earned. The expense ratio for the three months endedJune 30, 2022 decreased compared to the corresponding period in 2021. Higher average premiums per policy arising from rate increases in theCalifornia homeowners line of insurance business contributed to the decrease in the expense ratio. In addition, expenses for profitability-related accruals and advertising decreased. Combined ratio is equal to loss ratio plus expense ratio and is the key measure of underwriting performance traditionally used in the property and casualty insurance industry. A combined ratio under 100% generally reflects profitable underwriting results, and a combined ratio over 100% generally reflects unprofitable underwriting results. Income tax (benefit) expense was$(60.7) million and$26.2 million for the three months endedJune 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The decrease in income tax expense was primarily due to a$406.7 million decrease in total pre-tax income. Tax-exempt investment income, a component of total pre-tax (loss) income, remained relatively steady with the corresponding period in 2021. The Company's effective income tax rate can be affected by several factors. These generally include large changes in the composition of fully taxable income including net realized investment gains or losses, tax-exempt investment income, non-deductible expenses, and periodically, non-routine tax items such as adjustments to unrecognized tax benefits related to tax uncertainties. Tax-exempt investment income of approximately$18 million coupled with pre-tax loss of approximately$271 million resulted in an effective tax rate of 22.4%, above the statutory tax rate of 21%, for the three months endedJune 30, 2022 , while tax-exempt investment income of approximately$19 million coupled with pre-tax income of approximately$135 million resulted in an effective tax rate of 19.4%, below the statutory rate, for the corresponding period in 2021. 29
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents Investments
The following table presents the investment results of the Company:
Three Months Ended June 30,
2022 2021
(Dollars in thousands)
Average invested assets at cost (1)
Net investment income (2)
Before income taxes$ 38,555 $
30,953
After income taxes$ 33,517 $
27,676
Average annual yield on investments
Before income taxes 3.2 % 2.7 %
After income taxes 2.7 % 2.4 %
Net realized investment (losses) gains
__________
(1) Fixed maturities and short-term bonds at amortized cost; equities and other short-term investments at cost. Average invested assets at cost are based on the monthly amortized cost of the invested assets for each period. (2) Higher net investment income before and after income taxes for the three months endedJune 30, 2022 compared to the corresponding period in 2021 resulted largely from higher average yield combined with higher average invested assets. Average annual yield on investments before and after income taxes for the three months endedJune 30, 2022 increased compared to the corresponding period in 2021, primarily due to the maturity and replacement of lower yielding investments purchased when market interest rates were lower with higher yielding investments, as a result of increasing market interest rates.
The following tables present the components of net realized investment gains
(losses) included in net income:
Three Months Ended
Gains
(Losses) Recognized in Net Income
Changes in fair
Sales value Total
(Amounts in thousands)
Net realized investment gains (losses)
Fixed maturity securities (1)(2) $ (19,582) $ (88,273) $ (107,855)
Equity securities (1)(3) 731 (134,369) (133,638)
Short-term investments (1) (182) (1,667) (1,849)
Note receivable (1) - - -
Options sold 1,392 12 1,404
Total $ (17,641) $ (224,297) $ (241,938)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2021
Gains
(Losses) Recognized in Net Income
Changes in
Sales fair value Total
(Amounts in thousands)
Net realized investment gains (losses)
Fixed maturity securities (1)(2) $ (239) $ 12,448 $ 12,209
Equity securities (1)(3) 13,691 32,421 46,112
Short-term investments (1) 235 (59) 176
Note receivable (1) - (15) (15)
Options sold 491 (168) 323
Total $ 14,178 $ 44,627 $ 58,805
30
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
__________
(1)The changes in fair value of the investment portfolio and note receivable
resulted from application of the fair value option.
(2)The decrease in fair value of fixed maturity securities for the second
quarter of 2022 primarily resulted from increases in market interest rates. The
increase in fair value of fixed maturity securities for the second quarter of
2021 primarily resulted from decreases in market interest rates.
(3)The primary cause for the decrease in fair value of equity securities for the
second quarter of 2022 was the overall decline in equity markets. The primary
cause for the increase in fair value of equity securities for the second quarter
of 2021 was the overall improvement in equity markets.
Net (Loss) Income
Three Months Ended June 30,
2022 2021
(Amounts in thousands, except per share
data)
Net (loss) income $ (210,681) $ 109,181
Basic average shares outstanding 55,371 55,371
Diluted average shares outstanding 55,371 55,376
Basic Per Share Data:
Net (loss) income $ (3.80) $ 1.97
Net realized investment (losses) gains, net of tax $ (3.45) $ 0.84
Diluted Per Share Data:
Net (loss) income $ (3.80) $ 1.97
Net realized investment (losses) gains, net of tax $
(3.45)
Six Months Ended
Revenues
Net premiums earned and net premiums written for the six months endedJune 30, 2022 increased 5.8% and 6.3%, respectively, from the corresponding period in 2021. The increase in net premiums earned and net premiums written for the six months endedJune 30, 2022 compared to the corresponding period in 2021 was primarily due to higher average premiums per policy arising from rate increases in theCalifornia homeowners line of insurance business and increases in the number of policies written outside ofCalifornia , partially offset by a decrease in the number of private passenger automobile policies written inCalifornia . Net premiums earned included ceded premiums earned of$34.6 million and$31.2 million for the six months endedJune 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Net premiums written included ceded premiums written of$35.0 million and$31.4 million for the six months endedJune 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The increase in ceded premiums earned and ceded premiums written for the six months endedJune 30, 2022 compared to the corresponding period in 2021 resulted mostly from higher reinsurance coverage and rates and growth in the covered book of business. The following is a reconciliation of net premiums earned to net premiums written: Six Months Ended June 30, 2022 2021 (Amounts in thousands) Net premiums earned$ 1,950,062 $ 1,842,741 Change in net unearned premiums 77,729 64,983 Net premiums written$ 2,027,791 $ 1,907,724 31
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents Expenses
The following table presents the Insurance Companies' loss, expense, and
combined ratios determined in accordance with GAAP:
Six Months Ended June 30,
2022 2021
Loss ratio 84.6 % 69.7 %
Expense ratio 23.5 % 24.5 %
Combined ratio 108.1 % 94.2 %
The loss ratio for the first half of 2022 and 2021 was affected by unfavorable
development of approximately $51 million and favorable development of
approximately $15 million , respectively, on prior accident years' loss and loss
adjustment expense reserves. The unfavorable development for the first half of
2022 was primarily attributable to higher than estimated losses and loss
adjustment expenses in the private passenger automobile and commercial property
lines of insurance business, partially offset by favorable development in the
commercial automobile and homeowners lines of insurance business. Inflationary
trends have accelerated to their highest level in decades, which has had a
significant impact on the cost of auto parts and labor as well as medical
expenses for bodily injuries, and supply chain and labor shortage issues have
lengthened the time to repair vehicles. Bodily injury costs are also under
pressure from social inflation. These factors were major contributors to the
adverse reserve development in the private passenger automobile line of
insurance business. The favorable development for the first half of 2021 was
primarily attributable to lower than estimated losses and loss adjustment
expenses in the commercial property and private passenger automobile lines of
insurance business, partially offset by unfavorable development in the
commercial automobile line of insurance business.
In addition, the 2022 loss ratio was negatively impacted by approximately $40
million of catastrophe losses, excluding unfavorable development of
approximately $3 million on prior years' catastrophe losses, primarily due to
winter storms, rainstorms and hail in Texas and winter storms in California . The
2021 loss ratio was negatively impacted by approximately $64 million of
catastrophe losses, excluding favorable development of approximately $4 million
on prior years' catastrophe losses, primarily due to the deep freeze and other
extreme weather events in Texas and Oklahoma and winter storms in California .
Excluding the effect of estimated prior periods' loss development and
catastrophe losses, the loss ratio was 79.9% and 67.0% for the first half of
2022 and 2021, respectively. The increase in the loss ratio was primarily due to
an increase in loss frequency and severity in the automobile line of insurance
business, partially offset by higher average premiums per policy arising from
rate increases in the California homeowners line of insurance business. After
bottoming out in the second quarter of 2020, automobile loss frequency has been
increasing and is near pre-pandemic levels. The inflationary pressures and the
supply chain and labor shortage issues discussed above have led to a significant
increase in automobile loss severity and increased losses and loss adjustment
expenses for the insured events of the current accident year for the six months
ended June 30, 2022 compared to the corresponding period in 2021. The Company
has filed for rate increases in many states and is taking various non-rate
actions to improve profitability.
The expense ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2022 decreased compared to
the corresponding period in 2021. Higher average premiums per policy arising
from rate increases in the California homeowners line of insurance business
contributed to the decrease in the expense ratio. In addition, expenses for
profitability-related accruals and advertising decreased.
Income tax (benefit) expense was $(116.9) million and $51.6 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The decrease in income tax
expense was primarily due to a $792.3 million decrease in total pre-tax income.
Tax-exempt investment income, a component of total pre-tax (loss) income,
remained relatively steady with the corresponding period in 2021.
Tax-exempt investment income of approximately $35 million coupled with pre-tax
loss of approximately $524 million resulted in an effective tax rate of 22.3%,
above the statutory tax rate of 21%, for the six months ended June 30, 2022 ,
while tax-exempt investment income of approximately $38 million coupled with
pre-tax income of approximately $268 million resulted in an effective tax rate
of 19.3%, below the statutory rate, for the corresponding period in 2021.
32
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Investments
The following table presents the investment results of the Company:
Six Months Ended June 30,
2022 2021
(Dollars in thousands)
Average invested assets at cost (1)
Net investment income (2)
Before income taxes$ 73,906 $
63,232
After income taxes$ 64,438 $
56,460
Average annual yield on investments
Before income taxes 3.0 % 2.8 %
After income taxes 2.6 % 2.5 %
Net realized investment (losses) gains
__________
(1) Fixed maturities and short-term bonds at amortized cost; equities and other short-term investments at cost. Average invested assets at cost are based on the monthly amortized cost of the invested assets for each period. (2) Higher net investment income before and after income taxes for the six months endedJune 30, 2022 compared to the corresponding period in 2021 resulted largely from higher average yield combined with higher average invested assets. Average annual yield on investments before and after income taxes for the six months endedJune 30, 2022 increased compared to the corresponding period in 2021, primarily due to the maturity and replacement of lower yielding investments purchased when market interest rates were lower with higher yielding investments, as a result of increasing market interest rates.
The following tables present the components of net realized investment gains
(losses) included in net income:
Six
Months Ended
Gains
(Losses) Recognized in Net Income
Changes in fair
Sales value Total
(Amounts in thousands)
Net realized investment gains (losses)
Fixed maturity securities (1)(2) $ (22,382) $ (246,201) $ (268,583)
Equity securities (1)(3) 6,293 (174,690) (168,397)
Short-term investments (1) (1,007) (1,665) (2,672)
Note receivable (1) - - -
Options sold 2,698 (70) 2,628
Total $ (14,398) $ (422,626) $ (437,024)
Six Months Ended
Gains (Losses) Recognized in Net Income
Changes in
Sales fair value Total
(Amounts in thousands)
Net realized investment gains (losses)
Fixed maturity securities (1)(2) $ (3,485) $ 4,391 $ 906
Equity securities (1)(3) 31,648 66,942 98,590
Short-term investments (1) 236 9 245
Note receivable (1) - (28) (28)
Options sold 861 (78) 783
Total $ 29,260 $ 71,236 $ 100,496
33
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
__________
(1)The changes in fair value of the investment portfolio and note receivable
resulted from application of the fair value option.
(2)The decrease in fair value of fixed maturity securities for the first half of
2022 primarily resulted from increases in market interest rates. The increase in
fair value of fixed maturity securities for the first half of 2021 primarily
resulted from decreases in market interest rates during the second quarter of
2021 and the overall improvement in fixed maturity securities markets during the
first half of 2021.
(3)The primary cause for the decrease in fair value of equity securities for the
first half of 2022 was the overall decline in equity markets. The primary cause
for the increase in fair value of equity securities for the first half of 2021
was the overall improvement in equity markets.
Net (Loss) Income
Six Months Ended June 30,
2022 2021
(Amounts in thousands, except per share
data)
Net (loss) income $ (407,599) $ 216,176
Basic average shares outstanding 55,371 55,366
Diluted average shares outstanding 55,371 55,375
Basic Per Share Data:
Net (loss) income $ (7.36) $ 3.90
Net realized investment (losses) gains, net of tax $ (6.24) $ 1.43
Diluted Per Share Data:
Net (loss) income $ (7.36) $ 3.90
Net realized investment (losses) gains, net of tax $ (6.24) $ 1.43
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
A. Cash Flows
The Company has generated positive cash flow from operations since the public
offering of its common stock in November 1985 . The Company does not attempt to
match the duration and timing of asset maturities with those of liabilities;
rather, it manages its portfolio with a view towards maximizing total return
with an emphasis on after-tax income. With combined cash and short-term
investments of $462.1 million at June 30, 2022 as well as $75 million of credit
available on the unsecured credit facility, the Company believes its cash flow
from operations is adequate to satisfy its liquidity requirements without the
forced sale of investments. Investment maturities are also available to meet the
Company's liquidity needs. However, the Company operates in a rapidly evolving
and often unpredictable business environment that may change the timing or
amount of expected future cash receipts and expenditures. Accordingly, there can
be no assurance that the Company's sources of funds will be sufficient to meet
its liquidity needs or that the Company will not be required to raise additional
funds to meet those needs or for future business expansion, through the sale of
equity or debt securities or from credit facilities with lending institutions.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2022
was $194.9 million , a decrease of $122.3 million compared to the corresponding
period in 2021. The decrease was primarily due to an increase in payments for
losses and loss adjustment expenses and operating expenses, partially offset by
an increase in premium collections, a decrease in payments for income taxes, and
an increase in collections from reinsurers on reinsurance recoverables. The
Company utilized the cash provided by operating activities during the six months
ended June 30, 2022 primarily for the net purchases of investment securities and
payment of dividends to its shareholders.
On July 29, 2022 , the Company's Board of Directors (the "Board") declared a
quarterly dividend of $0.3175 per share. The dividend will be paid on
September 29, 2022 to shareholders of record on September 15, 2022 . The Board
reduced the dividend as compared to prior periods to reflect challenging
business conditions caused primarily by extraordinarily high inflation rates,
particularly with respect to the settlement of claims. The Company is taking
premium rate increases and non-rate actions to improve profitability. The Board
will periodically review the Company's dividend policy and consider changes to
the
34
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
dividend pay-out when business conditions warrant.
On July 29, 2022 , the Board did not extend its authorization of the repurchase
of up to $200 million of the Company's Common Stock and allowed its
authorization to expire on July 29, 2022 , which the Board originally authorized
on July 31, 2020 . The Company has not repurchased any of the Company's Common
Stock under this authorization.
The following table presents the estimated fair value of fixed maturity
securities at
Fixed Maturity
Securities
(Amounts in thousands)
Due in one year or less $
318,155
Due after one year through two years
151,818
Due after two years through three years
146,089
Due after three years through four years
212,265
Due after four years through five years
299,188
Total due within five years $ 1,127,515
B. Reinsurance
For
exposure from earthquakes by placing earthquake risks directly with the
catastrophe exposure to fires following an earthquake.
The Company is the assuming reinsurer under a Catastrophe Participation Reinsurance Contract (the "Contract") effective for the 12 months endingDecember 31, 2022 . The Company reimburses a group of affiliates of a ceding company for a proportional share of a portfolio of catastrophe losses based on the premiums ceded to the Company under the Contract, to the extent the actual loss ratio exceeds the threshold loss ratio of 73.5% and 71% for the 12 months endingDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The total assumed premium under the Contract is$10.0 million and$12.5 million for the 12 months endingDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The total possible amount of losses for the Company under the Contract is$25.0 million and$31.3 million for the 12 months endingDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The Company recognized$2.5 million and$3.1 million in earned premiums and$1.7 million and$4.0 million in incurred losses under the Contract for the three months endedJune 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and$5.0 million and$6.3 million in earned premiums and$4.1 million and$7.9 million in incurred losses for the six months endedJune 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The Company is the ceding party to a Catastrophe Reinsurance Treaty (the "Treaty") covering a wide range of perils that is effective throughJune 30, 2023 . For the 12 months endingJune 30, 2023 and 2022, the Treaty provides approximately$936 million and$792 million of coverage, respectively, on a per occurrence basis after covered catastrophe losses exceed the Company retention limit of$60 million and$40 million , respectively. The Treaty specifically excludes coverage for anyFlorida business and forCalifornia earthquake losses on fixed property policies such as homeowners, but does cover losses from fires following an earthquake. The Treaty includes additional restrictions as noted in the tables below.
Coverage on individual catastrophes provided for the 12 months ending
2023
Catastrophe Losses and LAE
Percentage of
In Excess of Up to Coverage
(Amounts in millions)
Retained $ - $ 60 - %
Layer of Coverage 60 100 19.5
Layer of Coverage 100 200 98.8
Layer of Coverage (1) 200 530 98.6
Layer of Coverage (2) (3) (4) 530 930 100.0
Layer of Coverage 930 1,035 98.9
__________
(1) 5% of this layer covers
35 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents (2) 33% of this layer coversCalifornia ,Arizona andNevada only. (3) Layer of Coverage represents multiple actual treaty layers that are grouped for presentation purposes. (4) 6.3% of this layer covers onlyCalifornia wildfires and fires following an earthquake inCalifornia , and is not subject to reinstatement.
Coverage on individual catastrophes provided for the 12 months ended
2022
Catastrophe Losses and LAE
Percentage of
In Excess of Up to Coverage
(Amounts in millions)
Retained $ - $ 40 - %
Layer of Coverage 40 100 70
Layer of Coverage (1) (2) 100 450 100
Layer of Coverage (1) (3) (4) (5) 450 850 100
__________
(1) Layer of Coverage represents multiple actual treaty layers that are grouped for presentation purposes. (2) 4.1% of this layer excludesTexas . (3) 11.9% of this layer excludesTexas . (4) 15.0% of this layer coversCalifornia ,Arizona andNevada only. (5) 12.7% of this layer covers onlyCalifornia wildfires and fires following an earthquake inCalifornia , and is not subject to reinstatement.
The table below presents the combined total reinsurance premiums under the
Treaty (annual premiums and reinstatement premiums) for the 12 months ending
Annual Premium Reinstatement Premium Total Combined
Treaty (1) (2) Premium (2)
(Amounts in millions)
For the 12 months ending June 30, 2023 $ 74 $ - $ 74
For the 12 months ended June 30, 2022 $ 55 $ - $ 55
__________
(1) The increase in the annual premium is primarily due to an increase in reinsurance coverage and rates and growth in the covered book of business. (2) The reinstatement premium and the total combined premium for the treaty period endingJune 30, 2023 are projected amounts to be paid based on the assumption that there will be no reinstatements occurring during this treaty period. The reinstatement premium for the treaty period endedJune 30, 2022 is zero, as there were no actual reinstatement premiums paid. The Treaty endingJune 30, 2023 and 2022 each provides for one full reinstatement of coverage limits. Reinstatement premiums are based on the amount of reinsurance benefits used by the Company at 100% of the annual premium rate, with the exception of the reinstatement restrictions noted in the tables above, up to the maximum reinstatement premium of approximately$72 million and$51 million if the full amount of benefit is used for the 12 months endingJune 30, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The total amount of reinstatement premiums is recorded as ceded reinstatement premiums written at the time of the catastrophe event based on the total amount of reinsurance benefits expected to be used for the event, and such reinstatement premiums are recognized ratably over the remaining term of the Treaty as ceded reinstatement premiums earned. The catastrophe events that occurred in 2022 caused approximately$40 million in losses to the Company, resulting primarily from winter storms, rainstorms and hail inTexas and winter storms inCalifornia . No reinsurance benefits were available under the Treaty for these losses as none of the 2022 catastrophe events individually resulted in losses in excess of the Company's per-occurrence retention limit of$40 million under the Treaty for the 12 months endingJune 30, 2022 . The catastrophe events that occurred in 2021 caused approximately$113 million in losses to the Company as ofJune 30, 2022 , resulting primarily from the deep freeze and other extreme weather events inTexas andOklahoma , rainstorms, wildfires and winter storms inCalifornia , and the impact of Hurricane Ida inNew Jersey andNew York . No reinsurance benefits were 36 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents available under the Treaty for these losses as none of the 2021 catastrophe events individually resulted in losses in excess of the Company's per-occurrence retention limit of$40 million under the Treaty for each of the 12 months endingJune 30, 2022 and 2021. The Company carries a commercial umbrella reinsurance treaty and a per-risk property reinsurance treaty, and seeks facultative arrangements for large property risks. In addition, the Company has other reinsurance in force that is not material to the consolidated financial statements. If any reinsurers are unable to perform their obligations under a reinsurance treaty, the Company will be required, as primary insurer, to discharge all obligations to its policyholders in their entirety.
C. Invested Assets
Portfolio Composition
An important component of the Company's financial results is the return on its investment portfolio. The Company's investment strategy emphasizes safety of principal and consistent income generation, within a total return framework. The investment strategy has historically focused on maximizing after-tax yield with a primary emphasis on maintaining a well-diversified, investment grade, fixed income portfolio to support the underlying liabilities and achieve return on capital and profitable growth. The Company believes that investment yield is maximized by selecting assets that perform favorably on a long-term basis and by disposing of certain assets to enhance after-tax yield and minimize the potential effect of downgrades and defaults. The Company believes that this strategy enables the optimal investment performance necessary to sustain investment income over time. The Company's portfolio management approach utilizes a market risk and consistent asset allocation strategy as the primary basis for the allocation of interest sensitive, liquid and credit assets as well as for determining overall below investment grade exposure and diversification requirements. Within the ranges set by the asset allocation strategy, tactical investment decisions are made in consideration of prevailing market conditions.
The following table presents the composition of the total investment portfolio
of the Company at
Cost (1) Fair Value
(Amounts in thousands)
Fixed maturity securities:
U.S. government bonds $ 14,265 $ 14,026
Municipal securities 2,758,012 2,710,968
Mortgage-backed securities 166,414 156,074
Corporate securities 567,171 522,529
Collateralized loan obligations 315,976 301,046
Other asset-backed securities 181,304 174,041
4,003,142 3,878,684
Equity securities:
Common stock 541,234 635,185
Non-redeemable preferred stock 64,429
57,721
Private equity funds measured at net asset value (2) 135,427
89,896
741,090 782,802
Short-term investments 174,874 172,130
Total investments $ 4,919,106 $ 4,833,616
______________
(1) Fixed maturities and short-term bonds at amortized cost; equities and other
short-term investments at cost.
(2) The fair value is measured using the NAV practical expedient. See Note 5.
Fair Value Measurements of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional information.
At
value and 58.7% of its total fixed maturity securities at fair value were
invested in tax-exempt state and municipal bonds. Equity holdings consist of
non-redeemable preferred stocks, dividend-bearing common stocks on which
dividend income is partially tax-sheltered by the 50% corporate dividend
received deduction, and private equity funds. At
short-term investments consisted of highly rated short-duration securities
redeemable on a daily or weekly basis.
37 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of ContentsFixed Maturity Securities and Short-Term Investments Fixed maturity securities include debt securities, which are mostly long-term bonds and other debt with maturities of at least one year from purchase, and which may have fixed or variable principal payment schedules, may be held for indefinite periods of time, and may be used as a part of the Company's asset/liability strategy or sold in response to changes in interest rates, anticipated prepayments, risk/reward characteristics, liquidity needs, tax planning considerations, or other economic factors. Short-term instruments include money market accounts, options, and short-term bonds that are highly rated short duration securities and redeemable within one year. A primary exposure for the fixed maturity securities is interest rate risk. The longer the duration, the more sensitive the asset is to market interest rate fluctuations. As assets with longer maturity dates tend to produce higher current yields, the Company's historical investment philosophy has resulted in a portfolio with a moderate duration. The Company's portfolio is heavily weighted in investment grade tax-exempt municipal bonds. Fixed maturity securities purchased by the Company typically have call options attached, which further reduce the duration of the asset as interest rates decline. The holdings that are heavily weighted with high coupon issues, are expected to be called prior to maturity. Modified duration measures the length of time it takes, on average, to receive the present value of all the cash flows produced by a bond, including reinvestment of interest. As it measures four factors (maturity, coupon rate, yield and call terms) which determine sensitivity to changes in interest rates, modified duration is considered a better indicator of price volatility than simple maturity alone.
The following table presents the maturities and durations of the Company's fixed
maturity securities and short-term investments:
June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021
(in years)
Fixed Maturity Securities
Nominal average maturity:
excluding short-term investments 11.6 10.8
including short-term investments 11.1 10.4
Call-adjusted average maturity:
excluding short-term investments 4.8 4.6
including short-term investments 4.6 4.5
Modified duration reflecting anticipated early calls:
excluding short-term investments
3.7 3.5 including short-term investments 3.5 3.4 Short-Term Investments - - Another exposure related to the fixed maturity securities is credit risk, which is managed by maintaining a weighted-average portfolio credit quality rating of A+, at fair value, atJune 30, 2022 , consistent with the average rating atDecember 31, 2021 . The Company's municipal bond holdings, of which 84.0% were tax exempt, represented 58.7% of its fixed maturity securities portfolio atJune 30, 2022 , at fair value, and are broadly diversified geographically. See Part I-Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks for a breakdown of municipal bond holdings by state. To calculate the weighted-average credit quality ratings disclosed throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, individual securities were weighted based on fair value and credit quality ratings assigned by nationally recognized securities rating organizations. Taxable holdings consist principally of investment grade issues. AtJune 30, 2022 , fixed maturity securities holdings rated below investment grade and non-rated bonds totaled$6.3 million and$29.2 million , respectively, at fair value, and represented 0.2% and 0.8%, respectively, of total fixed maturity securities. The majority of non-rated issues are a result of municipalities pre-funding and collateralizing those issues withU.S. government securities with an implicitAAA equivalent credit risk. AtDecember 31, 2021 , fixed maturity securities holdings rated below investment grade and non-rated bonds totaled$7.1 million and$17.3 million , respectively, at fair value, and represented 0.2% and 0.4%, respectively, of total fixed maturity securities. The overall credit ratings for the Company's fixed maturity securities portfolio were relatively stable during the six months endedJune 30, 2022 , with 95.4% of fixed maturity securities at fair value experiencing no change in their overall rating. 38
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
4.1% and 0.5% of fixed maturity securities at fair value experienced upgrades
and downgrades, respectively, during the six months ended
The following table presents the credit quality ratings of the Company's fixed
maturity securities by security type at fair value:
June 30, 2022
(Dollars in thousands)
Total Fair
Security Type AAA(1) AA(1) A(1) BBB(1) Non-Rated/Other(1) Value(1)
U.S. government bonds:
Treasuries $ 14,026 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 14,026
Total 14,026 - - - - 14,026
100.0 % - % - % - % - % 100.0 %
Municipal securities:
Insured 48,319 253,610 90,955 39,282 12,253 444,419
Uninsured 94,672 646,690 1,310,799 193,826 20,562 2,266,549
Total 142,991 900,300 1,401,754 233,108 32,815 2,710,968
5.3 % 33.2 % 51.7 % 8.6 % 1.2 % 100.0 %
Mortgage-backed securities:
Commercial 14,400 6,855 4,794 - - 26,049
Agencies 621 - - - - 621
Non-agencies:
Prime 18,400 94,457 14,737 - 445 128,039
Alt-A - 442 - 154 769 1,365
Total 33,421 101,754 19,531 154 1,214 156,074
21.4 % 65.2 % 12.5 % 0.1 % 0.8 % 100.0 %
Corporate securities:
Communications - 172 - 5,689 - 5,861
Consumer, cyclical - 1,902 - 68,293 - 70,195
Consumer, non-cyclical - - 16,769 16,545 - 33,314
Energy - 7,081 3,560 40,041 - 50,682
Financial - 20,565 98,239 77,361 3,020 199,185
Industrial - 15,000 53,485 61,054 - 129,539
Technology - - - 707 - 707
Utilities - - 18,336 14,710 - 33,046
Total - 44,720 190,389 284,400 3,020 522,529
- % 8.6 % 36.4 % 54.4 % 0.6 % 100.0 %
Collateralized loan obligations:
Corporate 25,870 91,954 183,222 - - 301,046
Total 25,870 91,954 183,222 - - 301,046
8.6 % 30.5 % 60.9 % - % - % 100.0 %
Other asset-backed securities 4,420 76,996 63,300 29,325 - 174,041
2.5 % 44.3 % 36.4 % 16.8 % - % 100.0 %
Total $ 220,728 $
1,215,724
$ 3,878,684 5.7 % 31.3 % 47.9 % 14.1 % 1.0 % 100.0 % _____________
(1)Intermediate ratings are included at each level (e.g., AA includes AA+, AA
and AA-).
39
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
U.S. Government Bonds
The Company had $14.0 million and $13.1 million , or 0.4% and 0.3% of its fixed
maturity securities portfolio, at fair value, in U.S. government bonds at
June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021 , respectively. At June 30, 2022 , Moody's and
Fitch ratings for U.S. government-issued debt were Aaa and AAA , respectively,
although a significant increase in government deficits and debt could lead to a
downgrade. The Company understands that market participants continue to use
rates of return on U.S. government debt as a risk-free rate and have continued
to invest in U.S. Treasury securities. The modified duration of the U.S.
government bonds portfolio reflecting anticipated early calls was 1.3 years and
0.9 years at June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021 , respectively.
The Company had$2.71 billion and$2.84 billion , or 69.9% and 70.5% of its fixed maturity securities portfolio, at fair value, in municipal securities,$444.4 million and$424.1 million of which were insured, atJune 30, 2022 andDecember 31, 2021 , respectively. The underlying ratings for insured municipal bonds have been factored into the average rating of the securities by the rating agencies with no significant disparity between the absolute securities ratings and the underlying credit ratings as ofJune 30, 2022 andDecember 31, 2021 . AtJune 30, 2022 andDecember 31, 2021 , 56.7% and 56.8%, respectively, of the insured municipal securities, at fair value, most of which were investment grade, were insured by bond insurers that provide credit enhancement and ratings reflecting the credit of the underlying issuers. AtJune 30, 2022 andDecember 31, 2021 , the average rating of the Company's insured municipal securities was A+, which corresponded to the average rating of the investment grade bond insurers. The remaining 43.3% and 43.2% of insured municipal securities atJune 30, 2022 andDecember 31, 2021 , respectively, were non-rated or below investment grade, and were insured by bond insurers that the Company believes did not provide credit enhancement. The modified duration of the municipal securities portfolio reflecting anticipated early calls was 3.4 years and 3.1 years atJune 30, 2022 andDecember 31, 2021 , respectively. The Company considers the strength of the underlying credit as a buffer against potential market value declines which may result from future rating downgrades of the bond insurers. In addition, the Company has a long-term time horizon for its municipal bond holdings, which generally allows it to recover the full principal amounts upon maturity and avoid forced sales prior to maturity of bonds that have declined in market value due to the bond insurers' rating downgrades. Based on the uncertainty surrounding the financial condition of these insurers, it is possible that there will be future downgrades to below investment grade ratings by the rating agencies in the future, and such downgrades could impact the estimated fair value of municipal bonds.
AtJune 30, 2022 andDecember 31, 2021 , substantially all of the mortgage-backed securities portfolio of$156.1 million and$137.0 million , or 4.0% and 3.4%, respectively, of the Company's fixed maturity securities portfolio, at fair value, was categorized as loans to "prime" residential and commercial real estate borrowers. The Company had holdings of$26.0 million and$25.2 million at fair value ($26.7 million and$25.1 million at amortized cost) in commercial mortgage-backed securities atJune 30, 2022 andDecember 31, 2021 , respectively. The weighted-average rating of the entire mortgage-backed securities portfolio was AA at each ofJune 30, 2022 andDecember 31, 2021 . The modified duration of the mortgage-backed securities portfolio reflecting anticipated early calls was 6.6 years and 7.9 years atJune 30, 2022 andDecember 31, 2021 , respectively.
Corporate securities included in fixed maturity securities were as follows:
June
30, 2022
(Dollars in thousands)
Corporate securities at fair value $ 522,529 $ 523,853
Percentage of total fixed maturity securities portfolio 13.5 % 13.0 %
Modified duration 3.6 years 3.8 years
Weighted-average rating A- BBB+
40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Collateralized Loan Obligations
Collateralized loan obligations included in fixed maturity securities were as
follows:
June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021
(Dollars in thousands)
Collateralized loan obligations at fair value $ 301,046 $ 314,153
Percentage of total fixed maturity securities portfolio 7.8 % 7.8 %
Modified duration 5.5 years 6.3 years
Weighted-average rating A+ AA-
Other Asset-Backed Securities
Other asset-backed securities included in fixed maturity securities were as
follows:
June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021
(Dollars in thousands)
Other asset-backed securities at fair value $ 174,041 $ 200,209
Percentage of total fixed maturity securities portfolio 4.5 % 5.0 %
Modified duration 3.7 years 2.6 years
Weighted-average rating A+ AA-
Equity Securities
Equity holdings of $782.8 million and $970.9 million at fair value, as of
June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021 , respectively, consisted of non-redeemable
preferred stocks, common stocks on which dividend income is partially
tax-sheltered by the 50% corporate dividend received deduction, and private
equity funds. The Company had a net (loss) gain of $(174.7) million and $66.9
million due to changes in fair value of the Company's equity securities
portfolio for the six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The
primary cause for the decrease in fair value of the Company's equity securities
portfolio for the six months ended June 30, 2022 was the overall decline in
equity markets. The primary cause for the increase in fair value of the
Company's equity securities portfolio for the six months ended June 30, 2021 was
the overall improvement in equity markets.
The Company's common stock allocation is intended to enhance the return of and
provide diversification for the total portfolio. At June 30, 2022 , 16.2% of the
total investment portfolio at fair value was held in equity securities, compared
to 18.9% at December 31, 2021 .
D. Debt
OnMarch 8, 2017 , the Company completed a public debt offering issuing$375 million of senior notes. The notes are unsecured senior obligations of the Company with a 4.4% annual coupon payable onMarch 15 andSeptember 15 of each year commencingSeptember 15, 2017 . The notes mature onMarch 15, 2027 . The Company used the proceeds from the notes to pay off amounts outstanding under the existing loan and credit facilities and for general corporate purposes. The Company incurred debt issuance costs of approximately$3.4 million , inclusive of underwriters' fees. The notes were issued at a slight discount of 99.847% of par, resulting in the effective annualized interest rate including debt issuance costs of approximately 4.45%. OnMarch 29, 2017 , the Company entered into the 2017 Credit Agreement that provided for revolving loans of up to$50 million and was set to mature onMarch 29, 2022 . OnMarch 31, 2021 , the Company entered into the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement that amended and restated the 2017 Credit Agreement. The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, among other things, extended the maturity date of the loan that was the subject of the 2017 Credit Agreement toMarch 31, 2026 , addedU.S. Bank as an additional lender, and increased the aggregate commitments by all the lenders to$75 million from$50 million under the 2017 Credit Agreement. The interest rates on borrowings under the credit facility are based on the Company's debt to total capital ratio and range from LIBOR plus 112.5 basis points when the ratio is under 20% to LIBOR plus 150.0 basis points when the ratio is greater than or equal to 30%. Commitment fees for the undrawn portions of the credit facility range from 12.5 basis points when the ratio is under 20% to 22.5 basis points when the ratio is greater than or equal to 30%. The debt to total capital ratio is expressed as a percentage of (a) consolidated debt to (b) consolidated shareholders' equity plus consolidated 41
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
debt. The Company's debt to total capital ratio was 18.4% at
resulting in a 12.5 basis point commitment fee on the
portion of the credit facility. As of
borrowings under this facility.
The Company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants pertaining to minimum statutory surplus, debt to total capital ratio, and risk based capital ratio under the unsecured credit facility atJune 30, 2022 .
For additional information on debt, see Note 11. Notes Payable of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
E. Regulatory Capital Requirements
Among other considerations, industry and regulatory guidelines suggest that the ratio of a property and casualty insurer's annual net premiums written to statutory policyholders' surplus should not exceed 3.0 to 1. Based on the combined surplus of all the Insurance Companies of$1.63 billion atJune 30, 2022 , and net premiums written of$3.98 billion for the twelve months ended on that date, the ratio of net premiums written to surplus was 2.44 to 1 atJune 30, 2022 .
Unum Group Reports Second Quarter 2022 Results
PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL INC FILES (8-K) Disclosing Results of Operations and Financial Condition, Regulation FD Disclosure, Financial Statements and Exhibits
Advisor News
- NAIFA: Financial professionals are essential to the success of Trump Accounts
- Changes, personalization impacting retirement plans for 2026
- Study asks: How do different generations approach retirement?
- LTC: A critical component of retirement planning
- Middle-class households face worsening cost pressures
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Trademark Application for “INSPIRING YOUR FINANCIAL FUTURE” Filed by Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company: Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company
- Jackson Financial ramps up reinsurance strategy to grow annuity sales
- Insurer to cut dozens of jobs after making splashy CT relocation
- AM Best Comments on Credit Ratings of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America Following Agreement to Acquire Schroders, plc.
- Crypto meets annuities: what to know about bitcoin-linked FIAs
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Researchers from California Polytechnic State University Report on Findings in COVID-19 (Exploring the Role of Race/Ethnicity, Metropolitan Status, and Health Insurance in Long COVID Among U.S. Adults): Coronavirus – COVID-19
- Former NFL player convicted in nearly $200M Medicare fraud scheme
- Senior Health Insurance in Florida Adapts to 2026 Care Costs
- Officials Report Record Enrollment In CT's Health Insurance Marketplace
- 'Washington is broken': Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Roy Cooper pledges to fight for affordable health insurance, Medicaid expansion
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News