Medicare for All or public option? Balter, Conole disagree on health care in TV debate
Balter and Conole were asked during NewsChannel 9's debate Monday about their positions on Medicare for All. While there are various Medicare for All proposals, the idea is to achieve universal health care by allowing Americans to enroll in Medicare.
Conole does not support Medicare for All. Instead, he wants to strengthen the Affordable Care Act -- he didn't provide specifics on how he would improve the 2010 health care law -- and create a public option that would allow uninsured Americans to buy into a Medicare-like system.
His stance is based on the challenges his parents faced when his father retired and his mother, who wasn't eligible for Medicare, lost health insurance coverage. His father, who served in the Army Reserves, was able to buy into TRICARE, which is available for military service members, retirees and their families.
"Since we launched this campaign, we have been talking about health care as one of the number one crises that we confront and I believe that it is our generation's crisis to face and to solve," Conole said. "Everywhere you go in the district, health care is a major concern and it's personal. It's personal for almost everyone."
Balter disagrees with Conole that a public option would be enough to solve the problem. She said it would leave 10 million Americans uninsured -- an apparent reference to a Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget study of Vice President
Balter's plan would phase in a Medicare for All system. She supports lowering the age of eligibility for Medicare from 65 to 55, allowing Americans of any age to buy into the program and enroll babies when they're born so they are guaranteed coverage when they begin their lives.
The byproduct of that, Balter argues, is that there will be more competition for private insurers, which will force insurance companies to offer better rates and services.
"This is the way we can get everyone covered in this country," she said.
But Conole countered that there wouldn't be progress on health care by "ordering central New Yorkers into a plan." He said his proposal would allow central New Yorkers to make their own health care decisions.
If central New Yorkers want Medicare, he said, they can buy into Medicare. But they could also choose to keep their existing private insurance plans.
"I think it's a much better approach, an approach that we can galvanize central New Yorkers behind," Conole said.
Balter reiterated her view that the public option wouldn't fix the flaws with the private health insurance market. She also defended Medicare for All by stating that no one would be forced into a plan.
Private insurance would be available under Balter's proposal. She said if someone wants more coverage than what Medicare is offered, they could seek additional insurance in the private market.
"This plan has been studied and it has been demonstrated to save money for the overall economy," she said.
As the debate progressed, the candidates were asked about
Balter and Conole were also asked about defunding police departments.
Balter thinks there has been "a lot of confusion" about what defund the police means. She does not support abolishing police departments, but she does believe that more needs to be invested in community programs and services. Conole agrees. He said funding should be re-prioritized.
The NewsChannel 9 debate aired at
The
Absentee ballots are being returned and in-person voting began Saturday.
On
Politics reporter
Get Government & Politics updates in your inbox!
Stay up-to-date on the latest in local and national government and political topics with our newsletter.
___
(c)2020 The Citizen, Auburn, N.Y.
Visit The Citizen, Auburn, N.Y. at www.auburnpub.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Can Job Market Sustain Its Gains? Uncertainties Cloud Future
Fed Moves To Ensure Companies Can Tap Bond Market For Funds
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News