Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Conditions of Participation for Home Health Agencies; Delay of Effective Date
Final rule; delay of effective date.
CFR Part: "42 CFR Parts 409, 410, 418, 440, 484, 485 and 488"
RIN Number: "RIN 0938-AG81"
Citation: "82 FR 31729"
Document Number: "CMS-3819-F2"
Page Number: "31729"
"Rules and Regulations"
SUMMARY: This final rule delays the effective date for the final rule entitled "Medicare and Medicaid Programs: Conditions of Participation for Home Health Agencies" published in the
EFFECTIVE DATE: The effective date of the final rule published on
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On
The
II. Provisions of the Proposed Regulations
Following publication of the
We believe that the concerns expressed in the inquiries have merit, so in response to the concerns summarized above, we published a proposed rule on
We also proposed to make two conforming changes to dates that appear in the regulations text of the
Second, we proposed to revise
III. Analysis of and Responses to Public Comments
We received 48 letters of public comment from HHA industry associations, surveyors, HHAs, and individuals. A summary of the major issues and our responses follow.
Comment: The majority of comments that were submitted expressed support for the proposed
Response: We appreciate the support from commenters regarding our proposal to delay the effective date of the
Comment: Several commenters supported the proposed effective date delay for implementing performance improvement projects, as required at
Response: We appreciate the support of the commenters. As stated in the
Comment: A commenter supported the inclusion of a grandfather clause related to the personnel training and education requirements for HHA administrators at
Response: We appreciate the support and are finalizing the proposal at
Comment: Several commenters submitted comments regarding the content of the
Response: While we understand that commenters have technical questions regarding how to implement the requirements of the
Comment: Numerous commenters requested additional information regarding the expected timeframe for release of the Interpretive Guidelines. Commenters also suggested that CMS work with stakeholders to develop the content of the guidance.
Response: We appreciate the opportunity to provide additional information regarding the Interpretive Guidelines for HHAs. Existing Guidance to Surveyors for HHAs can currently be found in Appendix B of the State Operations Manual (SOM). Updates to the Interpretive Guidelines to reflect the requirements of the
Comment: A commenter suggested that CMS should make training regarding the HHA CoPs available to all interested parties.
Response: We will undertake training for state surveyors on an as-needed basis to assure that those individuals have the necessary knowledge to assess compliance with the new regulations. As previously discussed, we have established an email box ([email protected]) for individuals to submit questions regarding the content of the HHA CoPs. We encourage those with specific questions to use this mailbox. We also note that the
Comment: A few commenters submitted suggestions related to guidance for transitioning existing subunits to standalone HHAs or branches. Commenter suggestions ranged from permitting subunits to automatically convert to a parent or branch without completing provider enrollment paperwork and the survey process, permitting a subunit to maintain subunit status while any transition to parent-HHA or branch is pending, permitting a subunit to qualify as a stand-alone HHA automatically with the filing of a CMS-855A that is effective upon filing, modifying the current branch approval process, and creating a separate delayed effective date for the subunit requirement.
Response: Guidance related to the conversion of subunits to standalone HHAs and branches is beyond the scope of this rule. We appreciate these suggestions and have shared them with the appropriate CMS staff. We will continue to monitor our conversion processes for subunits, and will consider future rulemaking to revise the effective date of the subunit elimination should the need arise.
Comment: A few commenters recommended that CMS review the content of the final home health CoPs to ensure they are reasonable and necessary, and rescind any provisions that are found to unduly burden HHA providers.
Response: We believe that the provisions of the home health CoPs final rule are reasonable and necessary, and that all burdens created are directly related to patient health and safety, and to improving the quality of care provided to HHA patients.
Comment: A commenter stated that CMS should align the effective date for the new emergency preparedness regulations with the
Response: Changing the effective date for the emergency preparedness requirements is outside the scope of this rule as the emergency preparedness requirements were established in separate rulemaking (Emergency Preparedness Requirements for Medicare and Medicaid Participating Providers and Suppliers, (81 FR 63859)).
Comment: A commenter requested that CMS provide further explanation of home health occupational therapy policy by including specific examples in Chapter 7, Section 30.4 of the Medicare Benefit Policy Manual.
Response: Changes to the Medicare Benefit Policy Manual are not within the scope of this rule. However, we have shared this recommendation with the appropriate CMS staff.
IV. Provisions of the Final Regulations
We are adopting as final the provisions set forth in the
* Delaying the effective date for the
* Revising the phase-in date for the requirements at
* Replacing the
V. Waiver of 60-
We ordinarily provide a 60-day delay in the effective date of the provisions of a rule in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(d)), which requires a 30-day delayed effective date; the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801(a)(3)), which requires a 60-day delayed effective date for major rules; and section 1871(e)(1)(B)(i) of the Act prohibits substantive Medicare rules from becoming effective less than 30 days before issuance. However, we can waive the delay in the effective date if the Secretary finds, for good cause, that the delay is impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, and incorporates a statement of the finding and the reasons in the rule issued. 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3); 5 U.S.C. 808(2); section 1871(e)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act.
Providing a 60-day delay in the effective date of this rule is contrary to public interest because it would negate the purpose of this rule, which is to postpone the effective date of the HHA CoP final rule from
VI. Collection of Information Requirements
This document does not impose information collection requirements, that is, reporting, recordkeeping or third-party disclosure requirements. Consequently, there is no need for review by the
VII. Regulatory Impact Statement
We have examined the impact of this rule as required by Executive Order 12866 on Regulatory Planning and Review (
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). A regulatory impact analysis (RIA) must be prepared for major rules with economically significant effects (
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) requires agencies to analyze options for regulatory relief of small entities. For purposes of the RFA, small entities include small businesses, nonprofit organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions. Most hospitals and most other providers and suppliers are small entities, either by nonprofit status or by having revenues of less than
In addition, section 1102(b) of the Social Security Act requires us to prepare a regulatory impact analysis if a rule may have a significant impact on the operations of a substantial number of small rural hospitals. This analysis must conform to the provisions of section 604 of the RFA. For purposes of section 1102(b) of the Act, we define a small rural hospital as a hospital that is located outside of a Metropolitan Statistical Area for Medicare payment regulations and has fewer than 100 beds. We are not preparing an analysis for section 1102(b) of the Act because we have determined, and the Secretary certifies, that this final rule would not have a significant impact on the operations of a substantial number of small rural hospitals.
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 also requires that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits before issuing any rule whose mandates require spending in any 1 year of
Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an agency must meet when it promulgates a proposed rule (and subsequent final rule) that imposes substantial direct requirement costs on state and local governments, preempts state law, or otherwise has Federalism implications. Since this regulation does not impose any costs on state or local governments, the requirements of Executive Order 13132 are not applicable.
Executive Order 13771, entitled "Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs," was issued on
In accordance with the provisions of Executive Order 12866, this regulation was reviewed by the
List of Subjects
42 CFR Part 409
Health facilities, Medicare.
42 CFR Part 410
Health facilities, Health professions, Kidney diseases, Laboratories, Medicare, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Rural areas, X-rays.
42 CFR Part 418
Health facilities, Hospice care, Medicare, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
42 CFR Part 440
Grant programs--health, Medicaid.
42 CFR Part 484
Health facilities, Health professions, Medicare, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
42 CFR Part 485
Grant programs--health, Health facilities, Medicaid, Medicare, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
42 CFR Part 488
Administrative practice and procedure, Health facilities, Medicare, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, effective
PART 484--HOME HEALTH SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 484 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 1102 and 1871 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1302 and 1395(hh)) unless otherwise indicated.
2. In
3. In
Dated:
Administrator,
Dated:
Secretary,
[FR Doc. 2017-14347 Filed 7-7-17;
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P



Sanders: States that Voted for Trump Would Be Hardest Hit Under Republican Health Care Plan
7th Bancassurance Asia Summit 2017: Asias Leading Bancassurance Summit (Hong Kong – August 23rd-24th, 2017) – Research and Markets
Advisor News
- Global economy ‘resilient’ in the wake of massive disruption
- Cryptocurrency legislation takes one step forward with bipartisan support
- IRS CEO FRANK J. BISIGNANO VISITS OHIO TO TOUT WORKING FAMILIES TAX CUTS PROVISIONS ON NO TAX ON CAR LOAN INTEREST, NO TAX ON OVERTIME, ENHANCED DEDUCTION FOR SENIOR CITIZENS
- The hidden flaw in insurance AI adoption for advisors and carriers
- Rising healthcare costs impact 401(k) accounts
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- MetLife Expands Guaranteed Retirement Income Offering with Innovative Flexible Annuity Option
- How annuities can help protect retirees from financial scams
- MetLife Inc. (NYSE: MET) Climbs to New 52-Week High
- The Standard and Pacific Guardian Life Announce Entry into Agreement to Transition Individual Annuities Business
- AuguStar Retirement launches StarStream Variable Annuity
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- UPDATED: Hecklers disrupt Hinson rally as Iowa U.S. Senate candidate touts stock trading ban
- Hecklers disrupt Hinson rally ahead of Tuesday primary
- In Case You Missed It: Hecklers disrupt Hinson rally
- National Association for Veterans Rights Raises Questions About Federal Court Ruling Impacting Veteran Claims Assistance
- From Network Automation to Agentic NetOps: NetBrain Sets the Standard for Deploying AI in Network Operations
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Halyk-Life, JSC
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Symetra Financial Corporation and Its Subsidiaries
- AM Best Assigns Credit Ratings to Park Avenue Life Insurance Company
- Nationwide reaches reinsurance agreement with MassMutual on UL policy block
- Best’s Market Segment Report: AM Best Maintains Outlook on Philippines’ Non-Life Insurance Segment at Stable
More Life Insurance News