Louisiana allowed insurers to drop more homeowners. Only one took advantage.
Consumer advocates and
New data shows little has changed after the state repealed the policy known as the "three-year rule," which banned insurers from dropping policyholders who had been customers for three years.
Documents from the
That company,
Foremost, which has about 2% of
"As part of an ongoing risk management program, we have notified LDI of our plan to nonrenew a small portion of our existing customers," Sahagun said.
It's not clear why other companies are not yet taking advantage of the law, and some could still cancel policyholders in the coming years.
But the lack of interest in using the new law is the latest indication that
State Rep.
Firment, a Pollock Republican, said homeowners should shop around with different insurers and agents, saying some find lower rates by comparing policies.
"Things have improved slower than what we hoped," he said. "But if you look at the affordability crisis across all sectors ... that's impacting people. If groceries are more and gas is more and electricity is more, then man, when insurance is still so high, it just hurts that much more."
Flurry of changes
After he took office in 2024, Insurance Commissioner
His predecessor,
The bill went into effect in
"Insurers move slowly, and the three-year rule nonrenewal plan submission process is new as of this year," Ford said. "We may see more insurers go through that process as they learn more about it, but now that insurers can effectively manage their risk, they are likely more comfortable with their overall books of business."
Little change to crisis
Meanwhile, though, homeowners' insurance rates have continued rising since Temple's package of bills became law. While the
And Landry's strategy — a controversial new law that allows Temple to reject "excessive" rate increases — has also not made a difference. Temple has vowed not to use the new authority, saying it would harm the market.
But while
"A lot of people were scared there would be a wholesale dropping of clients," he said. "It's just something that offers insurance companies more ability to manage their risk."
Andreanecia Morris, head of the nonprofit HousingNOLA, lobbied against the repeal of the three-year rule in 2024, warning it would hurt policyholders.
Now, Morris said the data showing only one company has canceled policies under the new law shows the three-year rule "was not the problem."
Instead,
"Ending three-year rule, ending consumer protections," she said. "Are we going to see in 2026 a Legislature that's ready to take the next step?"


Vermont’s largest health insurer tells you to avoid the state’s largest hospital in new marketing campaign
Insuring your pet? You should know about these changes to Florida law
Advisor News
- When a client moves, their insurance plan needs to move, too
- A rising retirement challenge: The license to spend
- Financial stress leaves less room for retirement saving
- Giving while you’re living: 3 frequently asked questions about gifting
- Helping clients prepare for one of their biggest retirement expenses
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Global Atlantic names Dan Farrelly head of IMO and IBD channels
- A rising retirement challenge: The license to spend
- What lower interest rates mean to annuity payouts
- AM Best downgrades A-Cap insurers amid financial and regulatory troubles
- Lawsuit claims Delaware Life hid billions in insurer-linked investments
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News